Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:10:35.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Further Examination of Organic Remains in Rhyolite-Ash in Malaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In a letter published in the March–April, 1942, number of this magazine I said I hoped to continue working on the problematical bodies found in rhyolite-ash in Malaya and first described by me in 1930. Further work has been done, but before giving the results I must mention the unusual sequence of events that has led up to the present paper. My identification of “rods, spheres, and club-shaped objects” as spongeremains in 1930 (the work was chiefly done in 1928) was then supported by Dr. M. Burton, who thought they came from marine sponges; but in February, 1942, he withdrew this support. In Annual Reports for 1937–1940 Mr. E. S. Willbourn, Director of the Geological Survey, Federated Malay States, recorded more outcrops of this ash and mentioned the discovery by Mr. H. D. Collings of stone axes in gravel of probably Mid-Pleistocene age below the ash. Supported by Dr. K. P. Oakley, Mr. H. D. Willbourn queried the problematical bodies being sponge-spicules.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annandale, N., 1918. Zoological Results of a Tour in the Far East. Sponges. Freshwater Sponges. Mem. Asiatic Soc. Bengal, vi, part iv, section 2. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S., 1864. A Monograph of the British Spongiadae, iiv. London.Google Scholar
Dendy, A., 1905. Sponges of the Gulf of Manaar. Suppl. Rept. to the Government of Ceylon, xviii, Royal Society.Google Scholar
Eames, A. J., MacDaniels, L. H., 1925. An Introduction to Plant Anatomy. New York and London.Google Scholar
Fristedt, K., 1885. Bidrag till Kännedomen om de vid Sveriges Vestra Kust lefvande Spongiae. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Harmer, S. F., 1915. Siboga Expedition Reports. Polyzoa.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J., and Holmes, W. M., 1892. Sponge Remains in the Lower Tertiary Strata near Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Journ. Linn. Soc., xxiv.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J., 1885. Beds of Sponge Remains in the Lower and Upper Greensand of the South of England. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., part ii.Google Scholar
Ijima, I., 1901. Studies of the Hexactinellidae, vol. iii, art. ii. Journ. Coll. Sci. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Ljima, I., 1926. Siboga Expedition Reports. The Hexactinellidae.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R., 1908. National Antarctic Expedition. Natural History, vol. iv. Tetractinellidae.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. von, 1906. Valdivia Expedition. Tetraxonia. Jena.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P., 1940. The Organic Content of Recent Rhyolite Ashes in Malaya. Geol. Mag., lxxvii, 289294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, F. E., 1900. Valdivia Expedition. Hexactinellidae. Jena.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E., 1902 (trans, by von Lendenfeld, R.). Investigator Expedition. The Indian Triaxonia. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Scrivenor, J. B., 1930. A Recent Rhyolitic-ash with Sponge-spicules and Diatoms in Malaya. Geol. Mag., lxvii, 385393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, I. B. J., 1936. Cambridge Natural History, vol. i. The Porifera.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J., 1888. Challenger Reports, vol. xxv. The Tetractinellidae. Royal Society.Google Scholar
Vines, S. H., 1896. A Student's Textbook of Botany. London.Google Scholar
Vosmaer, G. C. J., Verhout, J. H., 1902. Siboga Expedition Reports. The Porifera.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. V., 1904. Albatross Reports. Harvard College Memoirs. Comparative Zoology, vol. xxx, No. 1. The Sponges. Cambridge, U.S.A.Google Scholar