Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:28:15.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Slope Development in an Expanding Stream System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Carol S. Carter  and
Richard J. Chorley
Carol S. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.
Richard J. Chorley
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study of the morphometry of an ephemeral stream system which is incising itself into a terrace of the Farmington River, Connecticut, supports the regional relationship between stream-channel gradient and valley-side slope angle suggested by Strahler (1950). The continuing areal extension of the system allows stream order to be employed here as a relative measure of the passage of time. Thus it is possible to recognize that steepening and parallel development of a given valley-side slope may have their place in a sequence of early stage erosional development characterized by headward channel extension and ramification.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 117 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, J. P. and Le Heux, J. W. N., 1946. Projective geometric treatment of O. Lehmann's theory of the transformation of steep mountain slopes. K. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam Proc., 49, No. 5, 533–547.Google Scholar
Burmister, D. M., 1951. Soil Mechanics, vol. 1. Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chorley, R. J., 1957. Illustrating the laws of morphometry. Geol. Mag., xciv, 140–149.Google Scholar
Croxton, F. E. and Cowden, D. J., 1939. Applied General Statistics; Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Horton, R. E., 1945, Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 56, 275–370.Google Scholar
Leopold, L. B., 1953. Downstream change of velocity in rivers. Amer. Journ. Sci., 251, 606–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T., 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 252.Google Scholar
Leopold, L. B., and Miller, J. P., 1956. Ephemeral streams—hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage net— U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 252., Prof. Paper 282-A.Google Scholar
Savigear, R. A. G., 1952. Some observations on slope development in South Wales. Inst. Brit. Geographers, Trans. and Papers, 18, 31–51.Google Scholar
Schumm, S. A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 67, 597–646.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., 1958. Erosional processes and landforms in Badlands National Monument, South Dakota. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 69, 975–1008.Google Scholar
Strahler, A. N., 1950. Equilibrium theory of erosional slopes approached by frequency distribution analysis. Amer. Journ. Sci., 248, 673–698 and 800–814.Google Scholar
Strahler, A. N., 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 63, 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahler, A. N., 1954. Statistical analysis in geomorphic research; Journ. Geol., 62, 1–25:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahler, A. N., 1956. Quantitative slope analysis; Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 67, 571–596.Google Scholar
U.S. Weather Bureau, 1930. Climatic summary of the United States: Section 86, Massachussetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut.Google Scholar
U.S. Weather Bureau, 1952. Maximum 24 hour precipitation in the United States; Technical Paper No. 16.Google Scholar
Walker, H. M. and Lev, J., 1953. Statistical Inference, Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, A., 1935–1936, Morphologische Analyse und Experiment. Zeit. für Geomorph., 9, 1–24 and 57–87.Google Scholar