Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:25:00.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Devonian (Lochkovian) eurypterids from the Yunnan province of southwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2022

Zhiheng Ma
Affiliation:
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Tingshan Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
James C Lamsdell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
Jingwen Chen
Affiliation:
Fujian Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
Paul A Selden
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA Natural History Museum, London, UK
Liurunxuan Chen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
*
Author for correspondence: Tingshan Zhang, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two new eurypterids, a pterygotid Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. and an adelophthalmoid Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp., are described from the Early Devonian (Lochkovian) Xiaxishancun Formation of Yunnan province, southwest China. This discovery represents the first record of Parahughmilleria from Gondwana and the first Pterygotus from China. Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. is characterized by the first primary denticles (d1,d1′) being located on the middle part of the cheliceral ramus and third primary denticles (d3,d3′) elongate, even longer than the first primary denticles. Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. is differentiated by being a large Parahughmilleria with strongly developed lateral epimera from tergites T4 to T12. These discoveries not only extend the geographical extent of the genera Pterygotus and Parahughmilleria from Euramerica to SW China, but also give insight into the similarity of ecosystem structures across the Early Devonian world. In addition, based on previous studies, the new discoveries further support the hypothesis that eurypterids underwent a crisis during the Silurian–Devonian boundary interval.

Type
Rapid Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Eurypterids, also known as sea scorpions, are aquatic carnivorous chelicerates. Their fossil record dates back to the early Middle Ordovician, with the clade going extinct in the Late Permian (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007; Lamsdell et al. Reference Lamsdell, Briggs, Liu, Witzke and McKay2015; Lamsdell & Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017; Hughes & Lamsdell, Reference Hughes and Lamsdell2020; Poschmann & Rozefelds, Reference Poschmann and Rozefelds2021). They include some of the largest arthropods known to have existed, growing to 2 m or more in length (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1964; Chlupac, Reference Chlupáč1994; Braddy et al. Reference Braddy, Poschmann and Tetlie2008; Lamsdell & Braddy, Reference Lamsdell and Braddy2010). The family Pterygotidae is the most diverse clade of the order Eurypterida, with about 56 species in five genera (Lamsdell, Reference Lamsdell2022; Lamsdell & Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017). Pterygotidae originated in the Llandovery (early Silurian), went extinct in the Middle Devonian (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007; McCoy et al. Reference McCoy, Lamsdell, Poschmann, Anderson and Briggs2015) and were characterized by the possession of a laterally expanded pretelson, with most species having enlarged chelicerae with elongated proximal podomeres (Tetlie & Briggs, Reference Tetlie and Briggs2009). Pterygotids attained a nearly global distribution (Poschmann & Tetlie, Reference Poschmann and Tetlie2006; Miller, Reference Miller2007; Tetlie & Briggs, Reference Tetlie and Briggs2009; Lamsdell & Legg, Reference Lamsdell and Legg2010; Wang & Gai, Reference Wang and Gai2014) and were ecologically diverse predators with a range of visual acuity and a variety of cheliceral morphologies indicating adaptations towards a variety of benthic and actively swimming prey (Anderson et al. Reference Anderson, McCoy, McNamara and Briggs2014; McCoy et al. Reference McCoy, Lamsdell, Poschmann, Anderson and Briggs2015).The superfamily Adelophthalmoidea represents the most common eurypterids in the Late Palaeozoic, with about 46 species in seven genera (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007; Shpinev, Reference Shpinev2012; Lamsdell et al. Reference Lamsdell, Simonetto and Selden2014; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2015, Reference Poschmann2020; Shpinev & Filimonov, Reference Shpinev and Filimonov2018). Taxonomically they are the second most diverse of all eurypterid clades, after the Pterygotoidea, their putative sister group (Tetlie & Poschmann, Reference Tetlie and Poschmann2008).

Eurypterids were first reported from Yunnan province by the Yunnan Geological Survey (1973). The specimens were collected near the Siying coal mine at the base of the Devonian Xiaxishancun Formation. No additional study of the material was undertaken and the samples have been lost, with no additional eurypterid material reported from Yunnan province until the 21st century. Besides the eurypterids from Yunnan province, a number of eurypterid groups have been reported from the South China Block (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007; Zong et al. Reference Zong, Gong, Wei and Liu2017; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Dunlop, Gai, Lei, Jarzembowski and Wang2021), including pterygotoids, adelophthalmoids and mixopteroids. Wang & Gai (Reference Wang and Gai2014) recently reported the presence of Pterygotidae in the Lower Devonian Xitun Formation, based on an isolated chelicera with its two rami preserved. However, these authors left this specimen under open nomenclature, due to the poor preservation of the material and the fact that cheliceral morphology may be influenced by ontogeny and mode of life. Ma et al. (Reference Ma, Selden, Lamsdell, Zhang, Chen and Zhang2022) erected the new species Erettopterus qujingensis based on a chelicera, metastoma and several tergites from the Late Silurian Yulongsi Formation, as well as describing an incomplete carapace of Slimonia (Ma et al. Reference Ma, Selden, Lamsdell, Zhang, Chen and Zhang2022). Here, we report two new eurypterids from the Lower Devonian (Lochkovian) Xiaxishancun Formation of Yunnan, China, belonging to the pterygotid Pterygotus (Agassiz, Reference Agassiz and Murchison1839) and adelophthalmoid Parahughmilleria (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961).

2. Geological setting and stratigraphy

Silurian – Lower Devonian deposits are well developed in the Qujing area. The Silurian layers are assigned to the Miaogao and Yulongsi formations while the Xiaxishancun, Xitun, Guijiatun and Xujiachong formations belong to the Devonian. The strata in Qujing are well exposed and show a successive transition from the shallow marine facies of the Upper Silurian Miaogao Formation to the non-marine facies of the Xujiachong Formation. Our study outcrop of the Xiaxishancun Formation is c. 5 km west of Qujing city near Xiaxishan reservoir (coordinates 103.698351° N, 103.698351° E; Fig. 1a). The Xiaxishancun Formation is c. 51 m thick and the bottom conformably overlies the black fissile shale of the Yulongsi Formation; its top is also conformable with a purple sandstone of the Xitun Formation. The Xiaxishancun Formation consists mainly of continental deposits characterized by yellow sandstone and green shale, which yield abundant fish remains (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Giles, Friedman and Zhu2017), some primary plant fossils (Xue, Reference Xue2012) and euchelicerates (Lamsdell et al. Reference Lamsdell, Xue and Selden2013 b; Selden et al. Reference Selden, Lamsdell and Qi2015)

Fig. 1. (a) Generalized map showing geological features of the Qujing area and the eurypterid fossil locality (modified from figure 1 of Hao et al. Reference Hao, Xue, Liu and Wang2007). (b) Schematic stratigraphic column for Xiaxishancun Formation showing distribution of eurypterids at localities in the Qujing area.

Based on palynological data and carbon isotope (δ13Corg) analyses, the Xiaxishancun Formation is considered to be of Lochkovian age (Hao et al. Reference Hao, Xue, Liu and Wang2007; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhu, Mann, Herten and Lücke2011, Reference Zhao, Jia, Min and Zhu2015, Reference Zhao, Zhang, Jia, Shen and Zhu2021). The miospore assemblage identified is the Streelispora newportensis – Chelinospora cassicula Assemblage Zone (Fang et al. Reference Fang, Cai, Wang, Li, Gao, Wang, Geng and Wang1994; Hao et al. Reference Hao, Xue, Liu and Wang2007) which approximately corresponds to the Emphanisporites micrornatus – Streelispora newportensis Assemblage Zone of the Lochkovian age (Richardson & McGregor, Reference Richardson and McGregor1986; Fang et al. Reference Fang, Cai, Wang, Li, Gao, Wang, Geng and Wang1994; Hao et al. Reference Hao, Xue, Liu and Wang2007). Furthermore, carbon isotope (δ13Corg) analyses reveal positive δ13Corg shifts happening and reaching peak values as heavy as −25.2 % at the base of Xiaxishancun Formation (Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhu, Mann, Herten and Lücke2011, Reference Zhao, Jia, Min and Zhu2015, Reference Zhao, Zhang, Jia, Shen and Zhu2021). These results replicate a globally known positive shift in δ13Corg from the uppermost Silurian to the lowermost Devonian. Hence, the eurypterid beds, which are near the base of the Xiaxishancun Formation, were deposited in the early Lochkovian (Fig. 1b).

3. Materials

The specimens (GMG20211001001–10) described in this paper were collected from the lower part of the Xiaxishancun Formation. Being preserved in siltstones, the material is flattened and shows some tectonic distortion. The fossils were prepared using pneumatic chisels. All photographs were taken with a Sony ILCE-7M3 digital camera with a FE 24–105 mm f/4 G OSS lens. Photographs were processed and arranged into figures using image editing software (CorelDRAW 2018 and Adobe Photoshop CS). Morphological terminology follows Tollerton (Reference Tollerton1989), with denticle terminology following Miller (Reference Miller2007). All specimens examined in this study are deposited in the Geological Museum of Guizhou (GMG), Guiyang, Guizhou province, China. The IVPP (Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology)-I4593 measurement data were collected from Wang & Gai (Reference Wang and Gai2014).

4. Systematic palaeontology

Order Eurypterida Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1843

Suborder Eurypterina Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1843

Infraorder Diploperculata Lamsdell et al. Reference Lamsdell, Hoşgör and Selden2013

Superfamily Pterygotoidea Clarke & Ruedemann, Reference Clarke and Ruedemann1912

Family Pterygotidae Clarke & Ruedemann, Reference Clarke and Ruedemann1912

Genus Pterygotus Agassiz, Reference Agassiz and Murchison1839

Type species Pterygotus anglicus Agassiz, Reference Agassiz1844

Diagnosis. Pterygotidae of larger size, with a subtrapezoid prosoma; free ramus of chelicera terminating in a curved denticle; denticles curved posteriorly, without marginal serrations (emended from Miller, Reference Miller2007).

Pterygotus wanggaii new species (Figs 23)

Fig. 2. Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. (a) Holotype GMG20211001003 ramus of chelicera; (b) interpretive drawing of ramus of chelicera GMG20211001003. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Fig. 3. Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. (a) Partial carapace GMG20211001004; (b) partial isolated tergite GMG20211001008; (c) isolated coxa of prosomal appendage VI, GMG20211001007; (d) a portion of the coxa (gnathobase) of the walking leg, GMG20211001006; (5) partial isolated ramus specimen, GMG20211001005. All scale bars = 10 mm.

2014 Pterygotidae gen. et sp. indet. Wang & Gai, p. 297.

Type material. Holotype GMG20211001003; paratypes GMG20211001004–8; additional material IVPP-I4593.

Diagnosis. Pterygotus with chelicera bearing three principal denticles and about six intermediate denticles; cheliceral denticles exhibiting size differentiation and with longitudinal striations on the surface; all denticles upright with slightly posterior curvature; first primary denticles (d1,d1′) located on the middle part of ramus; third primary denticles (d3,d3′) elongate, even longer than first primary denticles.

Occurrence. Lower part of the Xiaxishancun Formation and Xitun Formation (Wang & Gai, Reference Wang and Gai2014; Lochkovian) Xiaxishan Reservoir near Qujing city, Yunnan, SW China.

Description. Specimen GMG20211001003 (Fig. 2) is an isolated chelicera comprising the fixed and free ramus and elongate basal podomere, total preserved length 96.4 mm. The fixed ramus is slightly longer than the free ramus. Both rami preserve fine detail of denticles. Denticles with fine longitudinal striations, without marginal serrations.

Fixed ramus preserved length 71.4 mm, maximum preserved width 16.4 mm. Terminal denticle (td) incomplete; however, the gentle curvature of the preserved ramus margin suggests the denticle may have been curved rather than angular in morphology. Primary denticle (d1) is more robust than others, length 9.0 mm, width at base 4.7 mm, upright with posterior curvature. Anterior principal denticle (d2) length 5.2 mm, width at base 1.8 mm, upright with posterior curvature. Third principal denticle (d3) length 8.2 mm, width at base 4.2 mm, upright with weak posterior curvature. Six intermediate denticles are interspersed between the primary denticles and a multitude of smaller denticles; the first (i1) occurs just posterior to the terminal denticle, only denticle base preserved, width at base 1.9 mm. Second intermediate denticle (i2) occurs 11.2 mm anterior of the primary denticle, length 1.3 mm, width at base 1.7 mm, upright. Third intermediate denticle (i3) located posterior to primary denticle, length 2.5 mm, width at base 1.3 mm, upright. Fourth intermediate denticle (i4) located 4.3 mm posterior to primary denticle, height 2.1 mm, width at base 1.2 mm, upright with posterior curvature. Fifth intermediate denticle (i5) with base obscured by brachiopods, located 4.4 mm anterior to third primary denticle, preserved height 3.6 mm, denticle slightly angled towards ramus distal termination. Sixth intermediate denticle (i6) located 9.3 mm posterior to third primary denticle, height 2.6 mm, width at base 2.0 mm, upright with posterior curvature.

Free ramus preserved length 66.8 mm, maximum preserved width 23.4 mm. Terminal denticle (td′) robust, angled slightly away from the ramus, height 9.2 mm, width at base 2.7 mm. The third principal denticle (d3′) is the most robust denticle, length 12.1 mm, width at base 4.8 mm, upright with slight posterior curvature. Denticle morphology and arrangement on free ramus is similar to that of fixed ramus.

GMG20211001005 (Fig. 3e) Partial isolated ramus, preserving partial appendage with third principal denticle and several intermediate denticles. Ramus total length 46.3 mm, width 13.8 mm. The third principal denticle only preserves the basal 5 mm. All denticles with fine longitudinal striations.

GMG20211001004 (Fig. 3a) Partial carapace, preserving left margin, lateral compound eye and portions of anterior margin. Carapace preserved length 47.9 mm, width 104.4 mm. The weak crumples on the surface suggest that the specimen represents an exuvium. The lateral eye is flattened and positioned anterolaterally, abutting the carapace margin, and is oval in shape with a length of 12.0 mm.

GM20211001006 (Fig. 3d) A portion of the coxa (gnathobase) of a walking leg. The length of the coxa is 29.4 mm, 33.9 mm across the eight denticles on the gnathobase. The full gnathobasic surface is not preserved but at least eight teeth are present, generally uniform in shape and decreasing regularly in size from anterior to posterior.

GMG20211001007 (Fig. 3c) An almost completely preserved isolated coxa of appendage VI. The coxa is broad, expanding distally with a marked constriction between the gnathobase and the distal expansion. The length of the coxa is 80.7 mm from the distal portion of the expanded posterior to the gnathobasic edge. The maximum width of the coxa, located towards the posterior of the expanded region, is 57.2 mm; the gnathobasic surface is incomplete, with a preserved width of 22.5 mm, and the subsequent constriction is 18.5 mm wide at its narrowest point. The full gnathobasic surface is not preserved but at least nine teeth are present, generally uniform in shape and decreasing regularly in size from anterior to posterior. The coxa surface is ornamented with broad lunule scales grading to small tubercles at the coxa midline.

GMG20211001008 (Fig. 3b) Partial tergite, length 26.3 mm, preserved width 42.7 mm, ornamentation of dense lunule scales across the tergite anteriorly to posteriorly.

Etymology. Named after the family names of Professors Wang Bo (王博) and Gai Zhikun (盖志琨), who reported the first specimen.

Remarks. The holotype (GMG20211001003) of Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. shares an almost identical denticle morphology and arrangement with specimen IVPP-I4593, which was described by Wang & Gai in Reference Wang and Gai2014. Hence, IVPP-I4593 and our new material can be attributed to the same species. However, due to the poor preservation and without any other specimens, Wang & Gai (Reference Wang and Gai2014) did not assign IVPP-I4593 to any genus or species (Wang & Gai, Reference Wang and Gai2014). Based on our new specimens it is clear that several characteristics of the species, such as the free ramus of chelicera terminating in a curved denticle, denticles curved posteriorly without marginal serrations, and an ornament of dense lunule scales across the tergite anteriorly to posteriorly, indicate an assignment to Pterygotus. We erect Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. based on the robust ramus with first primary denticles (d1,d1′) located on the middle part of ramus and elongate third primary denticles (d3,d3′) which are even longer than first primary denticles and all primary denticles with slight posterior curvature.

The new species closely resembles other well-known Pterygotus species, particularly Pterygotus cobbi Hall, Reference Hall1859 and Pterygotus barrandei Semper, Reference Semper1898 with the elongated and broad primary denticles of the chelicera. However, the free ramus of P. cobbi exhibits thinner, fewer and more widely spaced primary denticles and intermediate denticles are very rare (see Hall, Reference Hall1859; Leutze & Heubusch, Reference Leutze and Heubusch1963). In P. barrandei, the primary denticles are further apart and located more proximally on the ramus (Semper, Reference Semper1898; Chlupac, Reference Chlupáč1994). The cheliceral morphology of P. wanggaii is distinct from that of E. qujingensis, from the Upper Silurian Yulongsi Formation of Yunnan Province, which exhibits a thinner ramus and less differentiation between the cheliceral denticles.

Superfamily Adelophthalmoidea Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989

Family Adelophthalmidae Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989

Genus Parahughmilleria Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961

Diagnosis. Adelophthalmidae of small size; carapace semicircular; lateral eyes small, reniform and in centrilateral position of carapace; metastoma with deep triangular notch anteriorly; telson wide, lanceolate shape (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961; Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989).

Type species Parahughmilleria salteri Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961

Remark. Størmer (Reference Størmer1973) reported two Parahughmilleria species from the uppermost Lower Emsian of Alken: P. hefteri and P. major. The latter species was separated from the former mainly because of its larger size coupled with a more slender body and slight differences in the morphology of the genital appendage. However, based on recent studies indicating that the differences between both supposed species are due to ontogeny and preservational variation, some authors consider P. hefteri and P. major to be synonymous (Poschmann & Tetlie, Reference Poschmann and Tetlie2006; Lamsdell & Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2013; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2015). Here, we are inclined to regard P. major as a synonym of P. hefteri.

Parahughmilleria fuea new species (Fig. 4)

Fig. 4. Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. (a) Holotype GMG20211001001a, nearly complete specimen, scale bar = 20 mm; (b) interpretive drawing of Holotype GMG20211001001a, T = tergite, LE = lateral eye, C = carapace, MR = marginal rim, G = genital appendage, S = spatulae, scale bar = 20 mm; (c) holotype GMG20211001001b, counterpart of GMG20211001001a, scale bar = 20 mm; (d) interpretive drawing of holotype GMG20211001001b, T = tergite, t = telson, scale bar = 20 mm; (e) details of carapace of holotype GMG20211001001a, scale bar = 10 mm; (f) interpretive drawing of carapace of holotype GMG20211001001b, M = metastoma, O = ocelli, LE = lateral eye, CO V = coxa V, CO VI = coxa VI, WA = walking appendage, scale bar = 10 mm; (g) incomplete carapace GMG20211001002, LE = lateral eye, MR = marginal rim, scale bar = 10 mm.

Fig. 5. Palaeogeographic distribution of Pridolian to Lochkovian Pterygotus and Parahughmilleria. Global palaeogeographic reconstruction for the Pridolian to Lochkovian (420 Ma) is after Blakey (Reference Blakey2020). Circles represent localities of previously described Pterygotus; squares represent localities of previously described examples of Parahughmilleria (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007); star shows location of the Chinese eurypterids.

Type material. Holotype GMG20211001001a and GMG20211001001b (counterpart of GMG20211001001a); paratype GMG20211001002.

Diagnosis. Large Parahughmilleria with strongly developed lateral epimera from tergites T4 to T12.

Occurrence. Lower part of the Xiaxishancun Formation; Xiaxishan Reservoir near Qujing city, Yunnan, SW China.

Description. Two specimens are attributable to this species. GMG20211001001 (preserved as part and counterpart; Fig. 4a–f) consists of an articulated prosoma and opisthosoma but lacks the distal part of the telson; the prosomal appendages are partially preserved. The total length of the specimen is more than 110 mm and the maximum width is 39.4 mm. Carapace semicircular, length 28.2 mm, width at base 37.4 mm (L/W 0.75, lateral angle 107°). The carapace is arched and surrounded by a narrow marginal rim. The posterior margin of the carapace is crumpled weakly, but the available undistorted margins suggest it may be slightly convex. The lateral eyes are relatively small, 4.4 mm long, 2.2 mm wide, reniform and positioned centrilaterally. The median ocelli are small and rounded, positioned on the central part of carapace, with a diameter of 2.1 mm.

Metastoma 10.9 mm long, 5.4 mm wide (L/W 2.0), lateral part partially covered by podomeres from a walking leg, lateral angle c. 80°. Based on the wrinkle line and the uncovered left part, we suspect the metastoma is paraelliptical in shape (Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989). A pair of coxa VI are located at the posterior of the metastoma. The coxa are roughly triangular in shape, expanding distally with a marked constriction at the gnathobase. The length of coxa VI is 5.6 mm, the maximum width is 3 mm. Walking leg podomeres appear non-spiniferous. On the part (GMG20211001001a), the slender type-A genital appendage extends to the posterior margin of the fourth tergite, total length 8.9 mm. One smaller structure with a length of 3.3 mm and situated on the left side of the appendage is interpreted as a spatula.

The opisthosoma is widest at the third tergite. Each of the tergites curves anteriorly along the mid-line. The first tergite is slightly reduced, 3.8 mm long, with the succeeding preabdominal tergites 4.7–5.5 mm long. Only the first and second tergites lack posterolateral epimera, possibly weakly developed on the third tergite with small posterolateral corners. Fourth tergite with strongly developed triangular epimera, about 3.5 mm long. Seventh tergite c. 30.2 mm wide, tergite eight (first postabdominal tergite) 24.1 mm wide. Eighth to eleventh tergites with an almost constant length of c. 6.0 mm, becoming narrower posteriorly, with well-developed posterolateral epimera. The twelfth tergite (pretelson) and proximal part of the telson are preserved on the counterpart (GMG20211001001b), pretelson with a length of 9.5 mm and width of 13.6 mm. The telson is lanceolate, preserved length 15.0 mm, width at base 6.3 mm. The distal part of the telson is not preserved.

GMG20211001002 (Fig. 4g) preserves an incomplete carapace, damaged on the posterior side, preserved length of 14.7 mm and width of 30.3 mm. The carapace is arched and surrounded by a narrow marginal rim. Centrimesially positioned lateral eye preserved on the right side. The lateral eye is relatively small, 4.3 mm long, 2.2 mm wide, reniform in shape.

Etymology. Named after the family name of Ms Fu Lihong (付丽红) in recognition for her support of our research.

Remarks. Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. is relatively large compared with the other well-known species of Parahughmilleria, exhibiting a size much more typical of the largest adelophthalmoid Adelophthalmus. However, the L/W ratio of the metastoma, and the position of the compound eyes strongly indicate the Chinese adelophthalmoid can be assigned to Parahughmilleria. (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961; Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989). Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. shares many similarities with the P. hefteri, such as the elongate type-A genital appendage, the L/W ratio of metastoma, and the position of compound eyes (Størmer, Reference Størmer1973; Braddy, Reference Braddy2000; Poschmann & Tetlie, Reference Poschmann and Tetlie2006; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2015). However, there are some differences between Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. and Euramerican Parahughmilleria, with P. fuea n. sp. possessing strongly developed lateral epimera on the fourth to twelfth tergites whereas epimera are only observed on the seventh to twelfth tergites in the Euramerican species, even in larger specimens (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961; Kjellesvig-Waering & Leutze, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering and Leutze1966; Størmer, Reference Størmer1973; Poschmann & Tetlie, Reference Poschmann and Tetlie2006; Tetlie & Poschmann, Reference Tetlie and Poschmann2008; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2015, Reference Poschmann2017, Reference Poschmann2020). The developed lateral epimera are unlikely to be an ontogenetic difference because epimera can also be observed in the different ontogenetic stages of the closely related Adelophthalmus (Shpinev & Filimonov, Reference Shpinev and Filimonov2018).

5. Discussion

The eurypterid community from the Xiaxishancun Formation shares many similarities with that of the famous Willwerath Lagerstätte of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (Poschmann & Tetlie, Reference Poschmann and Tetlie2006; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2017, Reference Poschmann2020). The Willwerath Lagerstätte includes six eurypterid species referrable to the genera Jaekelopterus, Rhenopterus, Erieopterus, Adelophthalmus, Pruemopterus and Parahughmilleria (Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961; Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2020), some plant fossils (Alling & Briggs, Reference Alling and Briggs1961) and the putative euchelicerate Willwerathia (Anderson et al. Reference Anderson, Poschmann and Brauckmann1998; but see Lamsdell, Reference Lamsdell2020). Like the Willwerath Lagerstätte, beside the eurypterids Pterygotus wanggaii n.sp. and Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp., the euchelicerate Houia yueya (Lamsdell et al. Reference Lamsdell and Selden2013; Selden et al. Reference Selden, Lamsdell and Qi2015) and plant Zosterophyllum xishanense (Hao et al. Reference Hao, Xue, Liu and Wang2007; Xue, Reference Xue2012) are also present in the Xiaxishancun Formation. The Willwerath Lagerstätte is characterized by grey silty mudstones and muddy siltstones interbedded with fine sandstones, and the palaeoenvironment is considered as marginal marine; the lithological combination and marine tidal flat habitat of the Xiaxishancun Formation concurs with this. The discoveries from the Xiaxishancun Formation provide strong evidence that eurypterids formed comparable communities globally and give insight into the similarity of ecosystem structure across the Early Devonian world.

In addition, all of the 20 previously known species of Pterygotus are described from Europe, North America and Australia (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007), and four of five Parahughmilleria species are from Europe and North America, with the exception of Parahughmilleria matarakensis from Khakassia, Russia. The specimens described here broaden the distribution of Parahughmilleria and Pterygotus and represent the first Gondwanan record of Parahughmilleria. Moreover, the discoveries further support the notion that pterygotoids and adelophthalmoids had superior dispersal abilities leading to a more cosmopolitan distribution because of streamlined body form and substantial swimming abilities (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007). These new discoveries from China not only provide a broader picture of the biogeography of the group but also demonstrate that species in Gondwana occupied similar environments to their Laurentian relatives Fig. 5.

Furthermore, it is very exciting to find new eurypterids in Gondwana, especially during the Silurian–Devonian boundary interval. As one of the most important geological–biotic events, the Silurian–Devonian boundary event was marked by a major positive excursion of δ13C (Małkowski & Racki, Reference Małkowski and Racki2009; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhu, Mann, Herten and Lücke2011, Reference Zhao, Jia, Min and Zhu2015, Reference Zhao, Zhang, Jia, Shen and Zhu2021), global sea-level regression (Małkowski & Racki, Reference Małkowski and Racki2009), graptolite extinction (Urbanek et al. Reference Urbanek, Radzeviius, Kozowska and Teller2010) and a decrease in cephalopod species diversity (Laptikhovsky et al. Reference Laptikhovsky, Rogov, Nikolaeva and Arkhipkin2013). Lamsdell & Selden (Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017) suggested that eurypterids ended the Silurian on a bust, experiencing marked extinction during the Silurian–Devonian boundary interval. This phenomenon can also be confirmed in the Silurian–Devonian strata of the South China Block. The upper part of the Yulongsi Formation, which is considered as latest Pridolian in age (Qie et al. Reference Qie, Ma, Xu, Qiao, Liang, Guo, Song, Chen, Lu and Agassiz2019; Rong et al. Reference Rong, Wang, Zhan, Fan, Huang, Tang, Li, Zhang, Wu, Wang, Wei and Agassiz2019; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Zhang, Jia, Shen and Zhu2021), is dominated by the Erettopterus–Slimonia association (Ma et al. Reference Ma, Selden, Lamsdell, Zhang, Chen and Zhang2022), whereas in the Xiaxishancun Formation the Erettopterus and Slimonia community suddenly disappeared and was replaced by Parahughmilleria and Pterygotus. Beside the turnover of eurypterids, other organisms also undergo major shifts, such as the increased diversity of fishes (Zhao & Min, Reference Zhao and Min2010; Lu et al. Reference Lu, Giles, Friedman and Zhu2017) and abundance of plants (Xue, Reference Xue2012). In terms of environment, the Yulongsi Formation is considered lagoonal based on the dark, organic, intensely laminated silt–mudstone (Wang, Reference Wang2000). With the global sea-level regression during the Silurian–Devonian boundary interval, the Xiaxishancun Formation appears to consist of more siltstone layers and is considered a shallow tidal flat environment (Wang, Reference Wang2000). These shifts in sea level and depositional environment are synchronous with the positive excursion of δ13C (Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Zhang, Jia, Shen and Zhu2021). This discovery not only strongly supports the previously observed turnover of eurypterids at the end of the Silurian, experiencing marked extinction during the Silurian–Devonian boundary interval, but also indicates the environment experienced great change during the interval.

Acknowledgements

Thank to Dr Jason A. Dunlop and Dr Peter Van Roy for helpful comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Ms Fu Lihong (付丽红) for help with figures, assistance with our work and collection of fossils and Dr Zhang Huihong (张晖宏) (Yunnan University) for fossil collecting and useful suggestions during the early stages of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41972120; 42172129) and also supported by the State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS) (No. 173131)

References

Agassiz, JLR (1844) Monographie des poissons fossiles du vieux Grès Rouge, ou Système Dévonien (Old Red Sandstone) des Iles Britanniques et de Russie. Neuchâtel: Jent et Gassman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassiz, JLR (1839) Fishes of the upper Ludlow rock. In The Silurian System, Part 1. Founded on Geological Researches in the Counties of Salop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester, and Stafford: with Descriptions of the Coal-fields and Overlying Formations (ed Murchison, RI), pp 605–7. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Alling, HL and Briggs, LI (1961) Stratigraphy of upper silurian cayugan evaporites. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 45,515–47.Google Scholar
Anderson, LI, Poschmann, M and Brauckmann, C (1998) On the Emsian (Lower Devonian) arthropods of the Rhenish slate mountains; 2, The synziphosurine Willwerathia . Paläontologische Zeitschrift 72, 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RP, McCoy, VE, McNamara, ME and Briggs, D (2014) What big eyes you have: the ecological role of giant pterygotid eurypterids. Biology Letters 10, 387–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakey, RC (2020) Maps of ancient Earth – 600 Ma to present. https://deeptimemaps.com.Google Scholar
Braddy, SJ (2000) Eurypterids from the early Devonian of the midland valley of Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology 36, 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddy, SJ, Poschmann, M and Tetlie, OE (2008) Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod. Biology Letters 4, 106–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burmeister, H (1843) Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt, nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I (1994) Pterygotid eurypterids (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) in the Silurian and Devonian of Bohemia. Journal of the Czech Geological Society 39, 147–62.Google Scholar
Clarke, JM and Ruedemann, R (1912) The eurypterida of New York. Memoirs of the New York State Museum 14, 628.Google Scholar
Fang, Z, Cai, C, Wang, Y, Li, X, Gao, L, Wang, C, Geng, L and Wang, S (1994) New advance in the study of the Silurian-Devonian boundary in Qujing, East Yunnan. Journal of Stratigraphy 18, 8190.Google Scholar
Hall, J (1859) Natural history of New York. Paleontology: Geological Survey of New York 532, 120.Google Scholar
Hao, S, Xue, J, Liu, Z and Wang, D (2007) Zosterophyllum Penhallow around the Silurian-Devonian boundary of Northeastern Yunnan, China. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168, 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, ES and Lamsdell, JC (2020) Discerning the diets of sweep-feeding eurypterids: assessing the importance of prey size to survivorship across the late Devonian mass extinction in a phylogenetic context. Paleobiology 47, 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, EN (1961) The Silurian eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland. Journal of Paleontology 35, 789835.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, EN (1964) A synopsis of the family Pterygotidae Clarke and Ruedemann, 1912 (Eurypterida). Journal of Paleontology 38, 331–61.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, EN and Leutze, WP (1966) Eurypterids from the Silurian of West Virginia. Journal of Paleontology 40, 1109–22.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, JC (2020) A chasmataspidid affinity for the putative xiphosuran Kiaeria Størmer, 1934. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 94, 449–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, JC (2022) The chelicerae of Slimonia (Eurypterida; Pterygotoidea). Yale Peabody Museum Bulletin 63, 1525.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, JC and Braddy, SJ (2010) Cope’s Rule and Romer’s theory: patterns of diversity and gigantism in eurypterids and Palaeozoic vertebrates. Biology Letters 6, 265–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamsdell, JC, Briggs, DEG, Liu, HP, Witzke, BJ and McKay, RM (2015) The oldest described eurypterid: a giant middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) megalograptid from the Winneshiek Lagerstätte of Iowa. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamsdell, JC, Hoşgör, İ, Selden, PA (2013) A new Ordovician eurypterid (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) from southeast Turkey: evidence for a cryptic Ordovician record of Eurypterida. Gondwana Research 23(1), 354–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, JC and Legg, DA (2010) An isolated pterygotid ramus (Chelicerata: Eurypterida) from the Devonian Beartooth Butte formation, Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology 84, 1206–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, JC and Selden, PA (2013) Babes in the wood: a unique window into sea scorpion ontogeny. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, JC and Selden, PA (2017) From success to persistence: identifying an evolutionary regime shift in the diverse Paleozoic aquatic arthropod group Eurypterida, driven by the Devonian biotic crisis. Evolution 71, 95110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamsdell, JC, Simonetto, L and Selden, PA (2014) First eurypterid from Italy: a new species of Adelophthalmus (Chelicerata: Eurypterida) from the upper carboniferous of the Carnic Alps (Friuli, NE Italy). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 119, 147–51.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, JC, Xue, J and Selden, PA (2013b) A horseshoe crab (Arthropoda: Chelicerata: Xiphosura) from the lower Devonian (Lochkovian) of Yunnan, China. Geological Magazine 150, 367–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laptikhovsky, VL, Rogov, MA, Nikolaeva, SV and Arkhipkin, AA (2013) Environmental impact on ectocochleate cephalopod reproductive strategies and the evolutionary significance of cephalopod egg size. Bulletin of Geosciences 88, 8393.Google Scholar
Leutze, WP and Heubusch, CA (1963) Pterygotus in the Bertie formation (Silurian) of New York. Journal of Paleontology 37, 1080–2.Google Scholar
Lu, J, Giles, S, Friedman, M and Zhu, M (2017) A new stem sarcopterygian illuminates patterns of character evolution in early bony fishes. Nature Communications 8, 1932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Z, Selden, PA, Lamsdell, JC, Zhang, T, Chen, J and Zhang, X (2022) Two new eurypterids (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) from the upper Silurian Yulongsi formation of south-west China. Journal of Paleontology 96(5), 1078–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Małkowski, K and Racki, G (2009) A global biogeochemical perturbation across the Silurian–Devonian boundary: ocean–continent–biosphere feedbacks. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 276, 244–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, VE, Lamsdell, JC, Poschmann, M, Anderson, RP and Briggs, DE (2015) All the better to see you with: eyes and claws reveal the evolution of divergent ecological roles in giant pterygotid eurypterids. Biology Letters 11, 343–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, RF (2007) Pterygotus Anglicus Agassiz (chelicerata: Eurypterida) from Atholville, lower Devonian Campbellton formation, New Brunswick, Canada. Palaeontology 50, 981–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poschmann, MJ (2015) Sea scorpions (Chelicerata, Eurypterida) from the lower Devonian (Siegenian) of the Lahrbach Valley/Westerwald area (SW Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 89, 783–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poschmann, MJ (2017) Fossilien marin-terrestrischer Übergangsfazies der Nellenköpfchen-formation (Unterdevon, höchstes Unter-Emsium) aus dem Dünnbachtal bei Treis-Karden (Untermosel, Rheinland-Pfalz, SW-Deutschland). Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 54, 4763.Google Scholar
Poschmann, MJ (2020) A new sea scorpion (Arthropoda, Eurypterida) from the early Devonian of Willwerath (Rhineland-Palatinate, SW Germany). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 95, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poschmann, MJ and Rozefelds, A (2021) The last eurypterid: a southern high-latitude record of sweep-feeding sea scorpion from Australia constrains the timing of their extinction. Historical Biology 34, 2020–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poschmann, MJ and Tetlie, OE (2006) On the Emsian (Lower Devonian) arthropods of the Rhenish slate mountains: 5. Rare and poorly known eurypterids from Willwerath, Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 80, 325–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qie, WK, Ma, XP, Xu, HH, Qiao, L, Liang, K, Guo, W, Song, JJ, Chen, B, Lu, JF and Agassiz, L (2019) Devonian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Scientia Sinica 49, 115–38.Google Scholar
Richardson, JB and McGregor, DC (1986) Silurian and Devonian spore zones of the Old Red Sandstone continent and adjacent regions. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 364, 179.Google Scholar
Rong, JY, Wang, Y, Zhan, RB, Fan, JX, Huang, B, Tang, P, Li, Y, Zhang, XL, Wu, RC, Wang, GX, Wei, X and Agassiz, L (2019) Silurian integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China. Scientia Sinica 49, 93114.Google Scholar
Selden, PA, Lamsdell, JC and Qi, L (2015) An unusual euchelicerate linking horseshoe crabs and eurypterids, from the lower Devonian (Lochkovian) of Yunnan, China. Zoologica Scripta 44, 645–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semper, M (1898) Die Gigantostraken des älteren böhmischen Paläozoicum. Beiträge zur Paläontologie und Geologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients 2, 7188.Google Scholar
Shpinev, ES (2012) New species of the genus Adelophthalmus (Eurypterida, Chelicerata) found in the middle Devonian of Khakassia. Paleontological Journal 46, 470–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shpinev, ES and Filimonov, AN (2018) A new record of Adelophthalmus (Eurypterida, Chelicerata) from the Devonian of the South Minusinsk Depression. Paleontological Journal 52, 1553–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L (1973) Arthropods from the lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 3: Eurypterida, Hughmilleriidae. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 54, 119205.Google Scholar
Tetlie, OE (2007) Distribution and dispersal history of Eurypterida (Chelicerata). Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 252, 557–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, OE and Briggs, DEG (2009) The origin of pterygotid eurypterids (Chelicerata: Eurypterida). Palaeontology 52, 1141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, OE and Poschmann, M (2008) Phylogeny and palaeoecology of the Adelophthalmoidea (Arthropoda; Chelicerata; Eurypterida). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6, 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollerton, VP (1989) Morphology, taxonomy, and classification of the order Eurypterida Burmeister, 1843. Journal of Paleontology 63, 642–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbanek, A, Radzeviius, S, Kozowska, A and Teller, L (2010) Phyletic evolution and iterative speciation in the persistent Pristiograptus dubius lineage. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57, 589611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B and Gai, Z (2014) A sea scorpion claw from the lower Devonian of China (Chelicerata: Eurypterida). Alcheringa 38, 296300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H, Dunlop, J, Gai, Z, Lei, X, Jarzembowski, EA and Wang, B (2021) First mixopterid eurypterids (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) from the lower Silurian of South China. Science Bulletin 66, 2277–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J (2000) Age of the Yulongsi formation and the Silurian Devonian boundary in East Yunan. Journal of Stratigraphy 24, 144–50.Google Scholar
Xue, J (2012) Lochkovian plants from the Xitun formation of Yunnan, China, and their palaeophytogeographical significance. Geological Magazine 149, 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunnan Geological Survey (1973) 1: 200000 Yiliang Area Regional Geological Survey Report. Beijing: Geology Press, 225 pp.Google Scholar
Zhao, W, Wang, N, Zhu, M, Mann, U, Herten, U and Lücke, A (2011) Geochemical stratigraphy and microvertebrate assemblage sequences across the Silurian/Devonian transition in South China. Acta Geologica Sinica 85, 340–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, W, Zhang, X, Jia, G, Shen, YA and Zhu, M (2021) The Silurian-Devonian boundary in East Yunnan (South China) and the minimum constraint for the lungfish-tetrapod split. Science China Earth Sciences 64, 1784–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, WJ, Jia, GD, Min, Z and Zhu, Y (2015) Geochemical and palaeontological evidence for the definition of the Silurian/Devonian boundary in the Changwantang section, Guangxi Province, China. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 64, 110–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, WJ and Min, Z (2010) Siluro-Devonian vertebrate biostratigraphy and biogeography of China. Palaeoworld 19, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, R-W, Gong, Y-M, Wei, F and Liu, Q (2017) Fentou biota: a Llandovery (Silurian) shallow-water exceptionally preserved biota from Wuhan, Central China. Journal of Geology 125, 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Generalized map showing geological features of the Qujing area and the eurypterid fossil locality (modified from figure 1 of Hao et al.2007). (b) Schematic stratigraphic column for Xiaxishancun Formation showing distribution of eurypterids at localities in the Qujing area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. (a) Holotype GMG20211001003 ramus of chelicera; (b) interpretive drawing of ramus of chelicera GMG20211001003. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Pterygotus wanggaii n. sp. (a) Partial carapace GMG20211001004; (b) partial isolated tergite GMG20211001008; (c) isolated coxa of prosomal appendage VI, GMG20211001007; (d) a portion of the coxa (gnathobase) of the walking leg, GMG20211001006; (5) partial isolated ramus specimen, GMG20211001005. All scale bars = 10 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Parahughmilleria fuea n. sp. (a) Holotype GMG20211001001a, nearly complete specimen, scale bar = 20 mm; (b) interpretive drawing of Holotype GMG20211001001a, T = tergite, LE = lateral eye, C = carapace, MR = marginal rim, G = genital appendage, S = spatulae, scale bar = 20 mm; (c) holotype GMG20211001001b, counterpart of GMG20211001001a, scale bar = 20 mm; (d) interpretive drawing of holotype GMG20211001001b, T = tergite, t = telson, scale bar = 20 mm; (e) details of carapace of holotype GMG20211001001a, scale bar = 10 mm; (f) interpretive drawing of carapace of holotype GMG20211001001b, M = metastoma, O = ocelli, LE = lateral eye, CO V = coxa V, CO VI = coxa VI, WA = walking appendage, scale bar = 10 mm; (g) incomplete carapace GMG20211001002, LE = lateral eye, MR = marginal rim, scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Palaeogeographic distribution of Pridolian to Lochkovian Pterygotus and Parahughmilleria. Global palaeogeographic reconstruction for the Pridolian to Lochkovian (420 Ma) is after Blakey (2020). Circles represent localities of previously described Pterygotus; squares represent localities of previously described examples of Parahughmilleria (Tetlie, 2007); star shows location of the Chinese eurypterids.