Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:21:28.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation of Pebbles in Lower Old Red Sandstone Conglomerates Adjacent to the Highland Boundary Fault

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Donald M. Ramsay
Donald M. Ramsay
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of St. Andrews, Queen's College, Dundee.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The deformation produced by the pre-Upper Old Red Sandstone movements on the Highland Boundary Fault in a zone close to the fault was sufficiently intense to rupture the pebbles in conglomerates. The patterns of pebble fracturing are similar in type and orientation over a wide area and are comparable with the patterns obtained in the experimental deformation of brittle materials. In experimental deformation a direct relationship has been established between the fractures and the causal stresses and so from a statistical orientation of the fractures in the pebbles the directions of the principal stresses can be deduced.

The principal compression in the vicinity of the Highland Boundary Fault acted N.W.–S.E. varying in places to N.N.W.–S.S.E., normal to the trend of the fault, while the least principal stress acted parallel to the strike of the fault.

The orientation of the least principal stress parallel to the direction of the fault in the conglomerates arises through increased stress in a vertical direction due to the nature of the downbuckling of the rocks on the southern side of the fault.

The orientation of the maximum compression confirms the Highland Boundary Fault as a reverse fault of late Caledonian age rather than a Proto-Armorican wrench fault produced by N.N.E.-S.S.W. compression.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , 22 June 1964 , pp. 228 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, D. W., 1928. The Geology of the Highland Border from Tayside to Noranside. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 56, 67–88.Google Scholar
Allan, D. W., 1938. The Geology of the Highland Border from Glen Almond to Glen Artney. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 60, 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. M., 1942. The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation with Applications to Britain. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G. C., 1947. The Geology of the Highland Border: Stone-haven to Arran. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 61, 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbairn, H. W., 1949. Structural Petrology of the Deformed Rocks. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Griggs, D., and Handin, J., 1960. Observations on Fracture and a Hypothesis of Earthquakes. Mem. geol. Soc. Amer., 79, 347–64.Google Scholar
Hills, E. S., 1955. Outlines of Structural Geology. London.Google Scholar
Jaegar, J. C., 1956. Elasticity, Fracture, and Flow. London.Google Scholar
Jehu, T. J., and Campbell, R., 1917. The Highland Border Rocks of the Aberfoyle District. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., 52, 175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauder, W. R., 1962. Port Nicholson and the “Plough” Mechanism in Transcurrent Faulting. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys., 5, 189–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallien, W. J., 1938. Geology of Glasgow and District. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Oldham, R. D., 1921. Know your Faults. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 77, 81.Google Scholar
Ramsay, D. M., 1962. The Highland Boundary Fault: Reverse or Wrench Fault? Nature, Lond., 195, 1190–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sitter, L. U., 1956. Structural Geology. London.Google Scholar
du Toit, A. L., 1905. The Lower Old Red Sandstone Rocks of the Balmaha–Aberfoyle Region. Trans. geol. Soc. Edinb., 8, 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar