Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:15:33.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crustal seismic velocity structure of southern Poland: preserved memory of a pre-Devonian terrane accretion at the East European Platform margin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2010

M. NARKIEWICZ ,
M. GRAD ,
A. GUTERCH  and
T. JANIK
M. NARKIEWICZ*
Affiliation:
Polish Geological Institute, Rakowiecka 4, 00-975 Warszawa, Poland
M. GRAD
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
A. GUTERCH
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ks. Janusza 64, 01-452 Warszawa, Poland
T. JANIK
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ks. Janusza 64, 01-452 Warszawa, Poland
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The updated geological and potential fields data on the East European Platform margin in SE Poland confirm the existence of several regional units differing in Ediacaran to Silurian development: the Upper Silesian Block, Małopolska Block and Łysogóry Block. All the blocks are characterized by a distinct crustal structure seen in Vp velocity models obtained from the seismic refraction data of the CELEBRATION 2000 Programme. The first two units are interpreted as exotic terranes initially derived from Avalonia-type crust and ultimately accreted before the late Early Devonian. The Łysogóry Block is probably a proximal terrane displaced dextrally along the Baltica margin. The sutures between the terranes do not precisely match lateral gradients in Vp models. This is partly explained by a limited resolution of refraction seismic data (20 km wide interpretative window). Most of the difference is related, however, to a post-accretionary tectonism, mainly Variscan transtension–transpression. The latter processes took advantage of lithospheric memory recorded earlier as zones of rheological weakness along the former suture zones. The course of the East European Platform margin (= Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone) corresponds most likely to the Nowe Miasto–Zawichost Fault marking the NE boundary of the proximal Łysogóry Terrane.

Keywords

seismic refractioncrustal structurelithospheric memorycrustal accretionTeisseyre–Tornquist Zone
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 148 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 191 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

IN MEMORY OF PROFESSOR RYSZARD DADLEZ (1931–2008)

References

Babel Working Group. 1993. Deep seismic reflection/refraction interpretation of crustal structure along BABEL profiles A and B in the southern Baltic Sea. Geophysical Journal International 112, 325–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, P. J. 1992. LISPB revisited: a new look under the Caledonides of northern Britain. Geophysical Journal International 110, 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, U., Grad, M., Pharaoh, T. C., Thybo, H., Guterch, A., Banka, D., Lamarche, J., Lassen, A., Lewerenz, B., Scheck, M. & Marotta, A.-M. 2002. The southern margin of the East European Craton: new results from seismic sounding and potential fields between the North Sea and Poland. Tectonophysics 360, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belka, Z., Ahrendt, H., Franke, W. & Wemmer, K. 2000. The Baltica–Gondwana suture in central Europe: evidence from K–Ar ages of detrital muscovites and biogeographical data. In Orogenic Processes: Quantification and Modelling in the Variscan Belt (eds Franke, W., Haak, V., Oncken, O. & Tanner, D.), pp. 87–102. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 179.Google Scholar
Belka, Z., Valverde-Vaquero, P., Dörr, W., Ahrendt, H., Wemmer, K., Franke, W. & Schäfer, J. 2002. Accretion of first Gondwana-derived terranes at the margin of Baltica. In Palaeozoic Amalgamation of Central Europe (eds Winchester, J. A., Pharaoh, T. C. & Verniers, J.), pp. 19–36. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 201.Google Scholar
Bogacz, W. & Krokowski, J. 1981. Rotation of the basement of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae 50, 183–208.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, S., Gorbatschev, R., Grad, M., Janik, T., Guterch, A., Kozlovskaya, E., Motuza, G., Skridlaite, G., Starostenko, V., Taran, L., EUROBRIDGE & POLONAISE Working Groups. 2006. EUROBRIDGE: new insight into the geodynamic evolution of the East European Craton. In European Lithosphere Dynamics (eds Gee, D. G. & Stephenson, R. A.), pp. 599–625. Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 32.Google Scholar
Brochwicz-Lewiński, W., Pożaryski, W. & Tomczyk, H. 1981. Mouvements coulissants de grande ampleur au Paléozoïque inférieur le long de la marge sud-ouest de la plate-forme Est-Européenne. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 293, 855–8.Google Scholar
Brochwicz-Lewiński, W., Vidal, G., Pożaryski, W., Tomczyk, H. & Zając, R. 1986. Position tectonique du massif de Haute-Silésie avant le Permien à la lumière de données nouvelles sur le Cambrien de cette région. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 303, 1493–6.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Carbonell, R., Kukkonen, I., Ayala, C. & Golovanova, I. 2003. Composition of Uralide crust from seismic velocity (Vp, Vs), heat flow, gravity, and magnetic data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 210, 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buła, Z., Jachowicz, M. & Żaba, J. 1997. Principal characteristics of the Upper Silesian Block and Małopolska Block border zone (southern Poland). Geological Magazine 134, 669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buła, Z. & Żaba, J. 2005. Pozycja tektoniczna Górnośląskiego Zagłębia Węglowego na tle prekambryjskiego i dolnopaleozoicznego podłoża. In Geologia i zagadnienia ochrony środowiska w regionie górnośląskim (eds Jureczka, J., Buła, Z. & Żaba, J.), pp. 14–42. Materiały Konferencyjne 76 Zjazdu Naukowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geologicznego. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Buła, Z. & Żaba, J. 2008. Structure of the Precambrian basement of the eastern part of the Upper Silesian block (Brunovistulicum). Przegląd Geologiczny 56, 473–80.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. 2002. Key Lower Palaeozoic faunas from near the Trans European Suture Zone. In Palaeozoic Amalgamation of Central Europe (eds Winchester, J. A., Pharaoh, T. C. & Verniers, J.), pp. 37–46. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 201.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. & Torsvik, T. H. 2005. Baltica from the late Precambrian to mid-Palaeozoic times: The gain and loss of a terrane's identity. Earth-Science Reviews 72, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compston, W., Sambridge, M. S., Reinfrank, R. F., Moczydłowska, M., Vidal, G. & Claesson, S. 1995. Numerical ages of volcanic rocks and the earliest faunal zone within the Late Precambrian of east Poland. Journal of the Geological Society, London 152, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadlez, R. 1982. Permian–Mesozoic tectonics versus basement fractures along the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone in the territory of Poland. Kwartalnik Geologiczny 26, 273–84.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R. 1987. Phanerozoic basinal evolution along the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone. Kwartalnik Geologiczny 31, 263–78.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R. 2000. Pomeranian Caledonides (NW Poland), fifty years of controversies: a review and a new concept. Geological Quarterly 44, 221–36.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R. 2001. Holy Cross Mts. area – crustal structure, geophysical data and general geology. Geological Quarterly 45, 99–106.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R. 2006. The Polish Basin – relationship between the crystalline, consolidated and sedimentary crust. Geological Quarterly 50, 43–58.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R., Grad, M. & Guterch, A. 2005. Crustal structure below the Polish Basin: is it composed of proximal terranes derived from Baltica? Tectonophysics 411, 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadlez, R., Kowalczewski, Z. & Znosko, J. 1994. Some key problems of the pre-Permian tectonics of Poland. Geological Quarterly 38, 169–89.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R., Marek, S. & Pokorski, J. 1998. Palaeogeographic Atlas of Epicontinental Permian and Mesozoic in Poland (1:2 500 000). Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R., Marek, S. & Pokorski, J. 2000. Geological Map of Poland without Cainozoic Deposits (1:1 000 000). Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Dadlez, R., Narkiewicz, M., Stephenson, R. A., Visser, M. T. M. & van Wees, J.-D. 1995. Tectonic evolution of the Mid-Polish Trough: modeling implications and significance for central European geology. Tectonophysics 252, 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, F., Hanzl, P., Pin, C., Von Quadt, A. & Steyrer, H. P. 2000. The Brunovistulian: Avalonian Precambrian sequence at the eastern end of the Central European Variscides? In Orogenic Processes: Quantification and Modelling in the Variscan Belt (eds Franke, W., Haak, V., Oncken, O. & Tanner, D.), pp. 103–12. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 179.Google Scholar
Gągała, Ł. 2005. Pre-Ordovician polyphase tectonics of the Cambrian sequences in the Kielce Unit, Holy Cross Mts. (Central Poland). Geological Quarterly 49, 53–66.Google Scholar
Grabowska, T. & Bojdys, G. 2001. The border of the East-European Craton in south-eastern Poland based on gravity and magnetic data. Terra Nova 13, 92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grad, M., Guterch, A., Keller, G. R., Janik, T., Hegedűs, E., Vozár, J., Ślączka, A., Tiira, T. & Yliniemi, J. 2006 a. Lithospheric structure beneath trans-Carpathian transect from Precambrian platform to Pannonian basin: CELEBRATION 2000 seismic profile CEL05. Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (BO3301), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grad, M., Guterch, A. & Mazur, S. 2002. Seismic refraction evidence for continental structure in the central part of the Trans-European Suture Zone in Poland. In Palaeozoic Amalgamation of Central Europe (eds Winchester, J. A., Pharaoh, T. C. & Verniers, J.), pp. 295–309. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 201.Google Scholar
Grad, M., Guterch, A., Mazur, S., Keller, G. R., Špičák, A., Hrubcová, P. & Geissler, W. H. 2008. Lithospheric structure of the Bohemian Massif and adjacent Variscan belt in central Europe based on Profile S01 from the SUDETES 2003 experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (B10304), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grad, M., Janik, T., Guterch, A., Środa, P., Czuba, W. & EUROBRIDGE’94–97, POLONAISE’97 and CELEBRATION 2000 Seismic Working Groups. 2006 b. Lithospheric structure of the western part of the East European Craton investigated by deep seismic profiles. Geological Quarterly 50, 9–22.Google Scholar
Grad, M., Jensen, S. L., Keller, G. R., Guterch, A., Thybo, H., Janik, T., Tiira, T., Yliniemi, J., Luosto, U., Motuza, G., Nasedkin, V., Czuba, W., Gaczyński, E., Środa, P., Miller, K. C., Wilde-Piórko, M., Komminaho, K., Jacyna, J. & Korabliova, L. 2003. Crustal structure of the Trans-European suture zone region along POLONAISE’97 seismic profile P4. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (B11), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterch, A. & Grad, M. 2006. Lithospheric structure of the TESZ in Poland based on the modern seismic experiments. Geological Quarterly 50, 23–32.Google Scholar
Guterch, A., Grad, M., Keller, G. R., Posgay, K., Vozar, J., Špičák, A., Brueckl, E., Hajnal, Z., Thybo, H., Selvi, O. & CELEBRATION 2000 Experiment Team. 2003. CELEBRATION 2000 seismic experiment. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 47, 659–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterch, A., Grad, M., Materzok, R. & Perchuć, E. 1986. Deep structure of the earth's crust in the contact zone of the Palaeozoic and Precambrian Platforms in Poland (Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone). Tectonophysics 128, 251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterch, A., Grad, M., Materzok, R. & Toporkiewicz, S. 1983. Structure of the Earth's crust of the Permian Basin in Poland. Acta Geophysica Polonica 31, 121–38.Google Scholar
Guterch, A., Kowalski, T. J., Materzok, R., Pajchel, J. & Perchuć, E. 1976. O głębokiej strukturze skorupy ziemskiej w rejonie Gór Świętokrzyskich. In Przewodnik 48 Zjazdu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geologicznego (eds Pożaryski, W. & Głazek, J.), pp. 52–8. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Hakenberg, M. & Świdrowska, J. 1997. Propagation of the south-eastern segment of the Polish Trough connected with bounding fault zones (from Permian to Late Jurassic). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 324, 793–803.Google Scholar
Ito, T., Iwasaki, T. & Thybo, H. 2009. Deep seismic profiling of the continents and their margins. Tectonophysics 472, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janik, T., Grad, M., Guterch, A. & CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group. 2009. Seismic structure of the lithosphere between the East European Craton and the Carpathians from the net of CELEBRATION 2000 profiles in SE Poland. Geological Quarterly 53, 141–58.Google Scholar
Janik, T., Grad, M., Guterch, A., Dadlez, R., Yliniemi, J., Tiira, T., Keller, G. R., Gaczyński, E. & CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group. 2005. Lithospheric structure of the Trans-European Suture Zone along the TTZ – CEL03 seismic transect (from NW to SE Poland). Tectonophysics 411, 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janik, T., Yliniemi, J., Grad, M., Thybo, H., Tiira, T. & POLONAISE P2 Working Group. 2002. Crustal structure across the TESZ along POLONAISE’97 seismic profile P2 in NW Poland. Tectonophysics 360, 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaroszewski, W. 1972. Mesoscopic structural criteria of tectonics of non-orogenic areas: an example from the north-eastern Mesozoic margin of the Świętokrzyskie Mountains. Studia Geologica Polonica 38, 9–215.Google Scholar
Jaworowski, K. & Sikorska, M. 2006. Łysogóry Unit (Central Poland) versus East European Craton – application of sedimentological data from Cambrian siliciclastic association. Geological Quarterly 50, 77–88.Google Scholar
Jubitz, K.-B., Znosko, J., Franke, D. & Garetsky, R. 1986. Southwest border of the East European Platform. IGCP Project 86. Tectonic Map 1:1 500 000. Berlin: Zentrales Geologisches Institut.Google Scholar
Juhlin, C., Knapp, J. H., Kashubin, S. & Bliznetsov, M. 1996. Crustal evolution of the Middle Urals based on seismic reflection and refraction data. Tectonophysics 264, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczewski, Z. 2002. Late Palaeozoic–Mesozoic development of the Skrzynno Fault (northeastern border of the Holy Cross Mts.). Geological Quarterly 46, 281–91.Google Scholar
Kowalczewski, Z., Żylińska, A. & Szczepanik, Z. 2006. Kambr w Górach Świętokrzyskich. In Procesy i zdarzenia w historii geologicznej Gór Świętokrzyskich (eds Skompski, S. & Żylińska, A.), pp. 14–27. Materiały konferencyjne 77 Zjazdu Naukowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geologicznego. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Kowalski, W. R. 1983. Stratigraphy of the Upper Precambrian and lowest Cambrian strata in southern Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 33, 183–218.Google Scholar
Królikowski, C. 2006. Crustal-scale complexity of the contact zone between the Palaeozoic Platform and the East-European Craton in the NW Poland. Geological Quarterly 50, 33–42.Google Scholar
Królikowski, C., Petecki, Z. & Żółtowski, Z. 1999. Main structural units in the Polish part of the East-European Platform in the light of gravimetric data. Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 386, 5–58.Google Scholar
Krzywiec, P. 2007. Tectonics of the Lublin area (SE Poland) – new views based on results of seismic data interpretation. Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 422, 1–18.Google Scholar
Krzywiec, P. 2009. Devonian–Cretaceous repeated subsidence and uplift along the Teisseyre–Tornquist zone in SE Poland – Insight from seismic data interpretation. Tectonophysics 475, 142–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutek, J. 1994. Jurassic tectonic events in south-eastern cratonic Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 44, 167–221.Google Scholar
Kutek, J. 2001. The Polish Permo-Mesozoic rift basin. In Peri-Tethys Memoir 6. Peri-Tethyan rift/wrench basins and passive margins (eds Ziegler, P. A., Cavazza, W., Robertson, A. H. F. & Crasquin-Soleau, S.), pp. 213–36. Mémoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris no. 186.Google Scholar
Kutek, J. & Głazek, J. 1972. The Holy Cross area, Central Poland in the Alpine cycle. Acta Geologica Polonica 22, 603–53.Google Scholar
Lamarche, J., Lewandowski, M., Mansy, J.-L. & Szulczewski, M. 2003. Partitioning pre-, syn- and post-Variscan deformation in the Holy Cross Mountains, eastern Variscan foreland. In Tracing tectonic deformations using the sedimentary record (eds McCann, T. & Saintot, A.), pp. 159–84. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 208.Google Scholar
Lamarche, J., Świdrowska, J., Bergerat, F., Hakenberg, M., Mansy, J.-L., Wieczorek, J., Stupnicka, E. & Dumont, T. 1998. Development and deformation of a Mesozoic basin adjacent to the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone: The Holy Cross Mountains (Poland). In Peri-Tethys Memoir 4. Epicratonic basins of Peri-Tethyan platforms (eds Crasquin-Soleau, S. & Barrier, E.), pp. 75–92. Mémoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris no. 179.Google Scholar
Malinowski, M., Grad, M., Guterch, A. & CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group. 2008. Three-dimensional seismic modelling of the crustal structure between East European Craton and the Carpathians in SE Poland based on CELEBRATION 2000 data. Geophysical Journal International 173, 546–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, M., Środa, P., Grad, M., Guterch, A. & CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group. 2009. Testing robust inversion strategies for three-dimensional Moho topography based on CELEBRATION 2000 data. Geophysical Journal International 179, 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, M., Żelaźniewicz, A., Grad, M., Guterch, A. & Janik, T. 2005. Seismic and geological structure of the crust in the transition from Baltica to Palaeozoic Europe in SE Poland – CELEBRATION 2000 experiment, profile CEL02. Tectonophysics 401, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczydłowska, J. 1995. Late Proterozoic and Cambrian successions deposited on the East European Platform and Cadomian basement area. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 39, 276–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczydłowska, J. 1997. Proterozoic and Cambrian successions in Upper Silesia: an Avalonian terrane in southern Poland. Geological Magazine 134, 679–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczydłowska, J. 1998. Cambrian acritarchs from Upper Silesia, Poland: biochronology and tectonic implications. Fossils and Strata 46, 1–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moryc, W. & Łydka, K. 2000. Sedimentation and tectonics of the Upper Proterozoic–Lower Cambrian deposits of the southern Małopolska Massif (SE Poland). Geological Quarterly 44, 47–58.Google Scholar
Narkiewicz, M. 2002. Ordovician through earliest Devonian development of the Holy Cross Mts. (Poland): constraints from subsidence and thermal maturity data. Geological Quarterly 46, 255–66.Google Scholar
Narkiewicz, M. 2007. Development and inversion of Devonian and Carboniferous basins in the eastern part of the Variscan foreland (Poland). Geological Quarterly 51, 231–56.Google Scholar
Nawrocki, J., Dunlap, J., Pecskay, Z., Krzemiński, L., Żylińska, A., Fanning, M., Kozłowski, W., Salwa, S., Szczepanik, Z. & Trela, W. 2007. Late Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic palaeogeography of the Holy Cross Mountains (Central Europe): an integrated approach. Journal of the Geological Society, London 164, 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawrocki, J. & Poprawa, P. 2006. Development of Trans-European Suture Zone in Poland: from Ediacaran rifting to early Paleozoic accretion. Geological Quarterly 50, 59–76.Google Scholar
Nawrocki, J., Żylińska, A., Buła, Z., Grabowski, J., Krzywiec, P. & Poprawa, P. 2004. Early Cambrian location and affinities of the Brunovistulian terrane (Central Europe) in the light of palaeomagnetic data. Journal of the Geological Society, London 161, 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikishin, A. M., Ziegler, P. A., Stephenson, R. A., Cloetingh, S. A. P. L., Furne, A. V., Fokin, P. A., Arshov, A. V., Bolotov, S. N., Korotaev, M. V., Alekseev, A. S., Gorbachev, V. I., Shipilov, E. V., Lankreijer, A., Bembinova, E. Yu. & Shalimov, I. V. 1996. Late Precambrian to Triassic history of the East European Craton: dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution. Tectonophysics 268, 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczlon, M. S., Seghedi, A. & Carrigan, C. W. 2007. Avalonian and Baltican terranes in the Moesian Platform (southern Europe, Romania, and Bulgaria) in the context of Caledonian terranes along the southwestern margin of the East European craton. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 423, 375–400.Google Scholar
Oszczypko, N. 2006. Late Jurassic–Miocene evolution of the Outer Carpathian fold-and-thrust belt and its foredeep basin (Western Carpathians, Poland). Geological Quarterly 50, 169–94.Google Scholar
Pacześna, J. 2006. Evolution of the Late Neoproterozoic–Early Cambrian rift depocentres and facies in the Lublin–Podlasie sedimentary basin. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 186, 9–37.Google Scholar
Perchuć, E. 1984. Structure of the Earth's crust in southeastern Poland. Publications of the Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences A-13, 77–86.Google Scholar
Petecki, Z., Polechońska, O., Cieśla, E. & Wybraniec, S. 2003. Magnetic map of Poland, scale 1:500 000. Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Pharaoh, T. C. 1999. Palaeozoic terranes and their lithospheric boundaries within the Trans-European Suture Zone (TESZ): a review. Tectonophysics 314, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poprawa, P. 2006. Neoproterozoic break-up of the supercontinent Rodinia/Pannotia recorded by development of sedimentary basins at the western slope of Baltica. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 186, 165–88.Google Scholar
Poprawa, P. & Pacześna, J. 2002. Late Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic development of a rift at the Lublin–Podlasie slope of the East European Craton – analysis of subsidence and facies record (eastern Poland). Przegląd Geologiczny 50, 49–63.Google Scholar
Poupinet, G., Thouvenot, F., Zolotov, E. E., Matte, Ph., Egorkin, A. V. & Rackitov, V. A. 1997. Teleseismic tomography across the middle Urals: lithospheric trace of an ancient continental collision. Tectonophysics 276, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pożaryski, W. 1990. The Middle Europe Caledonides – wrenching orogen composed of terranes. Przegląd Geologiczny 38, 1–9.Google Scholar
Pożaryski, W. & Dembowski, Z. (eds) 1983. Geological Map of Poland and Neighbouring Countries Without Cenozoic, Mesozoic and Permian Deposits, 1:1 000 000. Warszawa: Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Pożaryski, W. & Kotański, Z. 1979. The tectonic development of the Polish part of East-European Platform forefield in the Bailkalian and Caledono-Variscan epochs. Kwartalnik Geologiczny 23, 7–19.Google Scholar
Pożaryski, W. & Nawrocki, J. 2000. Structure and the setting of the East European Platform margin in Central Europe. Przegląd Geologiczny 48, 703–6.Google Scholar
Pożaryski, W. & Tomczyk, H. 1968. Assyntian orogen in south-east Poland. Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego 237, 13–27.Google Scholar
Salwa, S. & Jarosiński, M. 2006. Ewolucja strukturalna dolnopaleozoicznego kompleksu Gór Świętokrzyskich – zarys problematyki. In Procesy i zdarzenia w historii geologicznej Gór Świętokrzyskich (eds Skompski, S. & Żylińska, A.), pp. 78–81. Materiały konferencyjne 77 Zjazdu Naukowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geologicznego. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Scheck, M., Bayer, U., Otto, V., Lamarche, J., Banka, D. & Pharaoh, T. 2002. The Elbe Fault System in North Central Europe – a basement controlled zone of crustal weakness. Tectonophysics 360, 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenov, V. Yu., Jankowski, J., Ernst, T., Jóźwiak, W., Pawliszyn, J. & Lewandowski, M. 1998. Electromagnetic soundings across the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland. Acta Geophysica Polonica 46, 171–85.Google Scholar
Stern, T. A. & McBride, J. H. 1998. Seismic exploration of continental strike-slip zones. Tectonophysics 286, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Środa, P. 2006. Seismic anisotropy of the upper crust in southeastern Poland – effect of the compressional deformation at the EEC margin: results of CELEBRATION 2000 seismic data inversion. Geophysical Research Letters 33 (L22302), 1–6.Google Scholar
Środa, P., Czuba, W., Grad, M., Guterch, A., Tokarski, A., Janik, T., Rauch, M., Keller, G. R., Hegedűs, E., Vozár, J. & CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group. 2006. Crustal and upper mantle structure of the Western Carpathians from CELEBRATION 2000 profiles CEL01 and CEL04: seismic models and geological implications. Geophysical Journal International 167, 737–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The DOBREfraction ’99 Working Group. 2003. DOBREfraction’99 – velocity model of the crust and upper mantle beneath the Donbas Foldbelt (East Ukraine). Tectonophysics 371, 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unrug, R., Harańczyk, Cz. & Chocyk-Jamińska, M. 1999. Easternmost Avalonian and Armorican–Cadomian terranes of central Europe and Caledonian–Variscan evolution of polydeformed Kraków mobile belt: geological constraints. Tectonophysics 302, 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde-Vaquero, P., Dörr, W., Belka, Z., Franke, W., Wiszniewska, J. & Schastok, J. 2002. U–Pb single-grain dating of detrital zircon in the Cambrian of central Poland: implications for Gondwana versus Baltica provenance studies. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 184, 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wees, J.-D., Stephenson, R. A., Ziegler, P. A., Bayer, U., McCann, T., Dadlez, R., Gaupp, R., Narkiewicz, M., Bitzer, F. & Scheck, M. 2000. On the origin of the southern Permian Basin, Central Europe. Marine and Petroleum Geology 17, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, J. A., Pharaoh, T. C. & Verniers, J. 2002. Palaeozoic amalgamation of Central Europe: an introduction and synthesis of new results from recent geological and geophysical investigations. In Palaeozoic Amalgamation of Central Europe (eds Winchester, J. A., Pharaoh, T. C. & Verniers, J.), pp. 1–18. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 201.Google Scholar
Winchester, J. A. & The PACE TMR Network Team. 2002. Paleozoic amalgamation of Central Europe: new results from recent geological and geophysical investigations. Tectonophysics 360, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wybraniec, S. 1999. Transformations and visualization of potential field data. Polish Geological Institute Special Papers 1, 1–88.Google Scholar
Żaba, J. 1999. The structural evolution of Lower Palaeozoic succession in the Upper Silesia Block and Małopolska Block border zone (Southern Poland). Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 166, 1–162.Google Scholar
Żelaźniewicz, A. 1998. Rodinian–Baltican link of the Neoproterozoic orogen in southern Poland. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Geologica 42, 509–15.Google Scholar
Żelichowski, A. M. 1979. Geological cross-section through marginal part of the Precambrian Platform in the Lublin–Podlasie area (Cenozoic excluded). Kwartalnik Geologiczny 23, 291–307.Google Scholar
Żelichowski, A. M. 1983. The tectonics of the Marginal Trough and its substrate in the zone of the Grójec Fault (Warsaw–Dęblin area). Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego 344, 199–224.Google Scholar
Żelichowski, A. M. & Kozłowski, S. 1983. Atlas of geological structure and mineral deposits in the Lublin region. Warszawa: Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Znosko, J. 1962. Present status of knowledge of geological structure of deep substratum of Poland beyond the Carpathians. Kwartalnik Geologiczny 6, 485–511.Google Scholar
Znosko, J. 1975. Tectonic units of Poland against the background of the tectonics of Europe. Geological Institute Anniversary Bulletin 252, 61–75.Google Scholar
Znosko, J. 1998. Tectonic Atlas of Poland. Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Narkiewicz supplementary material

Colour figure 6.jpg

Download Narkiewicz supplementary material(Image)
Image 2.5 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Narkiewicz supplementary material

Colour figure 7.jpg

Download Narkiewicz supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Narkiewicz supplementary material

Colour figure 9.jpg

Download Narkiewicz supplementary material(Image)
Image 719.7 KB