Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:14:57.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cretaceous Succession in Jamaica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. J. Chubb
L. J. Chubb
Affiliation:
Geological Survey Department, Kingston, Jamaica, B.W.I.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are wide divergencies between the views of different authors as to the correlation of the Jamaican Cretaceous rocks, the extreme views being (a) that the range covered is Albian to Turonian, and (b) that the rocks are mainly or wholly Maestrichtian in age.

An examination of all known occurrences of the rudist genera Barrettia and Titanosarcolites in the Antillean and Central American area suggests that the oft-repeated statement that these two genera occur in association is erroneous. In Jamaica the Barrettia Limestone lies at least 2,500 ft. below the Titanosarcolites Limestone.

Six palaeontological zones may be recognized in the Cretaceous of Jamaica, each containing its own peculiar assemblage of fossils, and with very few species common to two zones. Evidence is brought forward that only the highest part, comprising the uppermost two zones, should be included in the Maestrichtian, that the underlying shale is Campanian, that the Barrettia Limestone and associated shales are Turonian, and that the lowest zone at present known is Cenomanian.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , June 1955 , pp. 177 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adkins, W. S., 1928. Handbook of Texas Cretaceous Fossils. University of Texas Bull. No. 2838.Google Scholar
Boissevain, H., and MacGillavry, H. J., 1932. Some remarks on Barrettia sparcilirata Whitfield and Chiapasella radiolitiformis (Trechmann). Kon. Ak. van Wet. Amsterdam. Proc., xxxv, 1303–1312.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J., 1955. A Revision of Whitfield's Type Specimens of Rudist Mollusks from the Cretaceous of Jamaica, British West Indies. American Museum Novitates. No. 1713, 1–15.Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E., and Weisbord, N. E., 1931. Cretaceous limestone in British Honduras. Journ. Geol., xxxix, 483–4.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1926. Quelques fossiles du Crétacé supérieur de Cuba. Soc. Géol. France Bull., 4e sér., xxvi, 127–138.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1927. Nouveaux Rudistes du Crétacé de Cuba, Soc. Géol. France Bull., xxvii, 49–56.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R., 1869. Summary of the Palaeontology of the Caribbean Area. Appendix V to Sawkins Reports on the Geology of Jamaica.Google Scholar
Hawkins, H. L., 1923. Some Cretaceous Echinoidea from Jamaica. Geol. Mag., lx, 199–216.Google Scholar
Hawkins, H. L., 1924. Notes on a New Collection of Fossil Echinoidea from Jamaica. Soc. Géol. France Bull., lxi, 312–324.Google Scholar
Hermes, J. J., 1945. Geology and Palaeontology of East Camaguey and West Oriente Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht, Ser 2, No. 7.Google Scholar
Hose, H. R., 1950. The Geology and Mineral Resources of Jamaica. Col. Geol. Min. Res., 1, 11–36.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W., 1944. Cretaceous Formations of Central America and Mexico. Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geol., Bull., xxviii, 1077–1195.Google Scholar
Keijzer, F. G., 1945. Outline of the Geology of the Eastern part of the Province of Oriente, Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht, Ser 2, No. 6.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, H. J., 1934. Some rudists from the Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Kon. Ak. v. Wet. Amsterdam, Proc., xxxvii, 232–8.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, H. J., 1935. Remarks on Rudists. Kon. Ak. v. Wet. Amsterdam, xxxviii, 558–565.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, H. J., 1937. Geology of the Province of Camaguey, Cuba, with Revisional Studies in Rudist Palaeontology. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht. No. 14.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, H. A., 1933. Geology of Puerto Rico. Monographs Univ. Puerto Rico, Ser B, Physical and Biological Sciences, No. 1.Google Scholar
Mullerried, F. K. G., 1934. Sobre el Hallazzo de Paquiodontos gigantescos en el Cretacico de Chiapas. Institute de Biol., v, 81–2.Google Scholar
Mullerried, F. K. G., 1936. Estratigraphia preterciaria preliminar del Estado de Chiapas. Soc. Geol. Mexicana. Bol., ix, 31–41.Google Scholar
Rutten, M. G., 1936 a. Geology of the Northern Part of the Province of Santa Clara, Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht, No. 11.Google Scholar
Rutten, M. G., 1936 b. Rudistids from the Cretaceous of Northern Santa Clara Province, Cuba. Jouru. Paleont., x, 134–142.Google Scholar
Sapper, J., 1901. Die Alta Verapaz (Guatemala). Ein landeskundliche Skizze mit 5 Karten. Geog. Gesell. Hamburg Mitt., xvii, 78–224.Google Scholar
Sawkins, J. G., 1869. Reports on the Geology of Jamaica. Mem. Geol. Survey: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R., 1944. Index Fossils of North America. New York.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F., 1925. On Senonian Ammonoidea from Jamaica. Geol. Mag., lxii, 28–32.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W., 1938. A new Upper Cretaceous Rudistid from the Kemp Clay of Texas. U.S. Geol. Survey. Prof. Paper 193-A.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W., 1941. The Larger Invertebrate Fossils of the Navarro Group of Texas. Univ. Texas Publ. No. 4101.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W., 1942. Preliminary report on Upper Cretaceous Fossils collected by Mr. C. A. Matley in Jamaica, B.W.I, (unpublished).Google Scholar
Thiadens, A. A., 1936 a. Rudistids from Southern Santa Clara, Cuba. Kon. Ak. v. Wet. Amsterdam, Proc., xxxix, 1010–19.Google Scholar
Thiadens, A. A., 1936 b. On some Caprinids and a Monopleurid from Southern Santa Clara, Cuba. Kon. Ak. v. Wet. Amsterdam, 1132–1141.Google Scholar
Thiadens, A. A., 1937. Geology of the Southern Part of the Province of Santa Clara Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht. No. 12.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1922 a. The Cretaceous and Tertiary Question in Jamaica. Geol. Mag., lix, 422–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1922 b. The Barrettia Beds of Jamaica, Geol. Mag., 501–514.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1924. The Cretaceous Limestones of Jamaica and their Mollusca. Geol. Mag., lxi, 385–410.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1927. The Cretaceous Shales of Jamaica, Geol. Mag., lxiv, 27–42 and 49–65.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T., 1929. Fossils from the Blue Mountains of Jamaica. Geol. Mag., lxvi, 481–491.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W., 1923. Stratigraphy of the Virgin Islands of the United States and of Culebra and Vieques Islands, and Notes on Eastern Porto Rico. Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci., xiii, 303–317.Google Scholar
Vermunt, L. W. J., 1937 a. Geology of the Province of Pinar del Rio, Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht, No. 13.Google Scholar
Vermunt, L. W. J., 1937 b. Cretaceous Rudistids of Pinar del Rio, Cuba. Journ. Paleont., xi, 261–275.Google Scholar
Wessem, A. van, 1943. Geology and Paleontology of Central Camaguey, Cuba. Geogr. en Geol. Med. Utrecht, Ser 2, No. 5.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P., 1897 a. Descriptions of Species of Rudistae from the Cretaceous Rocks of Jamaica, W.I. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bull. ix, 185–196.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P., 1897 b. Observations on the Genus Barrettia Woodward, with Descriptions of Two New Species, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 233–246.Google Scholar
Withers, T. W., 1922. On a new Brachyurous Crustacean from the Upper Cretaceous of Jamaica. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, x, 534–541.Google Scholar
Withers, T. W., 1927. Ranina trechmanni, a new Cretaceous Crab from Jamaica. Geol. Mag., xliv, 176–180.Google Scholar
Woods, H., 1899–1913. A Monograph of the Cretaceous Lamellibranchia of England. Palaeont. Soc, London.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. P., 1862. Some Account of Barrettia, a new and remarkable shell from the Hippurite Limestone of Jamaica. The Geologist, ii, 372–377.Google Scholar