Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:14:59.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cretaceous crinoid Uintacrinus socialis from Jamaica and its significance for global correlation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2009

SIMON F. MITCHELL
SIMON F. MITCHELL*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica
*
*E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late Cretaceous crinoid Uintacrinus socialis Grinnell, which is a potential marker for the base of the Upper Santonian Substage, is reported from the Inoceramus Shales of St Ann's Great River Inlier on the north coast of Jamaica. This is the first record of this species from the Caribbean region and marks its lowest latitudinal distribution reported to date. The Inoceramus Shales are a deep-water clastic mudstone unit which extends the palaeoecological distribution of this crinoid. Uintacrinus socialis proves that the Inoceramus Shales are of Santonian age and will help constrain correlations between the shallow-water platform carbonate/volcaniclastic facies found in the arc successions of the Caribbean and the international chronostratigraphy.

Keywords

CretaceousSantonianJamaicaUintacrinus socialiscrinoid
Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 146 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 937 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bather, F. A. 1896. On Uintacrinus, a morphological study. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1895, 974–1004.Google Scholar
Burke, K. 1988. Tectonic evolution of the Caribbean. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 16, 210–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. 1866. Researches on the structure, physiology, and development of Antedon (Comatula) rosaceus. Part 1. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 156, 671–756.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1955. The Cretaceous Succession in Jamaica. Geological Magazine 92, 177–95.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1958. The Cretaceous Inlier of St Ann's Great River. Geonotes 1, 148–52.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1995. Occurrences of the free-swimming Upper Cretaceous crinoids Uintacrinus and Marsupites in the Western Interior of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2113-C, C1–C6. Washington.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., Gordon, C. M., Veltkamp, C. J. & Scott, A. D. 1993. Crinoids, asteroids, and ophiuroides in the Jamaican fossil record. In Biostratigraphy of Jamaica (eds Wright, R. M. & Robinson, E.), pp. 125–30. Geological Society of America, Memoir no. 182.Google Scholar
Esker, G. C. III. 1969. Planktonic foraminifera from St. Ann's Great River Valley, Jamaica. Micropaleontology 15, 210–20.Google Scholar
Gale, A. S., Montgomery, P., Kennedy, W. J., Hancock, J. M., Burnett, J. A. & McArthur, J. M. 1995. Definition and global correlation of the Santonian-Campanian boundary. Terra Nova 7, 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, A. S., Hancock, J. M., Kennedy, W.J., Petrizzo, M. R., Lees, J. A., Walaszczyk, I. & Wray, D. S. 2008. An integrated study (geochemistry, stable oxygen and carbon isotopes, nannofossils, planktonic foraminifera, inoceramid bivalves, ammonites and crinoids) of the Waxahachie Dam Spillway section, north Texas: a possible boundary stratotype for the base of the Campanian Stage. Cretaceous Research 29, 131–67.Google Scholar
Jarvis, I. 1980. The initiation of phosphatic chalk sedimentation – the Senonian (Cretaceous) of the Anglo-Paris Basin. In Marine phosphorites – geochemistry, occurrence, genesis (ed. Bentor, Y. K.), pp. 167–92. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication no. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1966. Notes on Cretaceous Inoceramidae (Bivalvia) of Jamaica. The Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica 8, 32–40.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Cobban, W. A. & Landman, N. H. 1997. Campanian ammonites from the Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation, the Mooreville Formation, and the basal part of the Demopolis Formation in Mississippi and Alabama. American Museum Novitates, No. 3201, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, A. A. & Krieg, E. A. 1977. Petroleum potential of Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: Ministry of Mining and Natural Resources, 131 pp.Google Scholar
Milson, C. V., Simms, M. J. & Gale, A. S. 1994. Phylogeny and palaeobiology of Marsupites and Uintacrinus. Palaeontology 37, 595–607.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. 1994. New data on the biostratigraphy of the Flamborough Chalk Formation (Santonian, Upper Cretaceous) between South Landing and Danes Dyke, North Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 50, 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. 1995. Uintacrinus anglicus Rasmussen from the Upper Cretaceous of Yorkshire: implications for the position of the Santonian-Campanian boundary. Cretaceous Research 16, 745–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. 2003. Sedimentary and tectonic evolution of central Jamaica. In The Circum-Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean: hydrocarbon habitats, basin formation, and plate tectonics (eds Bartolini, C., Buffler, R. T. & Blickwede, J. F.), pp. 605–23. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir no. 79. Tulsa, USA.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. 2006. Timing and implications of Late Cretaceous tectonic and sedimentary events in Jamaica. Geologica Acta 4, 171–8.Google Scholar
Ogg, J. G., Agterberg, F. P. & Gradstein, F. M. 2005. The Cretaceous Period. In A geologic time scale (eds Gradstein, F., Ogg, J. & Smith, A.), pp. 344–83. Cambridge University Press, 589 pp.Google Scholar
Pechersky, D. M., Naidin, D. P. & Molostovsky, E. A. 1983. The Santonian–Campanian reversed polarity magnetozone and the Late Cretaceous magnetostratigraphical time-scale. Cretaceous Research 4, 251–7.Google Scholar
Pessagno, E. A. Jr. 1978. Middle Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Antillean-Caribbean region and eastern Mexico notes on the ammonites of eastern Mexico. XXVIII. In Evenements de la partie moyenne du Cretace (Mid-Cretaceous events) Uppsala 1975 – Nice 1976 Reports sur la biostratigraphie des regions cles (reports on the biostratigraphy of key areas) (eds Reyment, R. A. & Thomel, G.), pp. 1–9. Annales de Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice 4 (1976). Centre d'Etudes Méditerranéennes, Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Nice, France.Google Scholar
Pindell, J., Kennan, L., Maresch, W. V., Stanek, K.-P., Draper, G. & Higgs, R. 2005. Plate-kinematics and crustal dynamics of circum-Caribbean arc continent interactions: Tectonic controls on basin development in Proto-Caribbean margins. In Caribbean–South American plate interactions, Venezuela (eds Avé Lallemant, H. G. & Sisson, V. B.), pp. 7–52. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 394.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. 1994. Jamaica. In Caribbean geology an introduction (eds Donovan, S. K. & Jackson, T. A.), pp. 111–27. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Publisher's Association.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1998. Upper Cretaceous trochacean gastropods from Puerto Rico and Jamaica. Palaeontographica Americana 60, 109 pp.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1901. Uintacrinus its structure and its relations. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 25, 1–89.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T. 1927. The Cretaceous shales of Jamaica. Geological Magazine 64, 27–42.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. & Schmidt, W. 1993. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from Jamaica and their stratigraphic and paleogeographic implications. In Biostratigraphy of Jamaica (eds Wright, R. M. & Robinson, E.), pp. 77–91. Geological Society of Jamaica, Memoir no. 182.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. E. & Manning, P. L. 1978. Geology of the Causeway Coast. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, 172 pp.Google Scholar