Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:28:50.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Craton-Mobile Belt relations with particular reference to the Mosetse-Matsitama area, north-eastern Botswana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

John D. Bennett
John D. Bennett
Affiliation:
Geological Survey Department, Lobatse, Botswana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Pre-Cambrian rocks of north-eastern Botswana comprise two major geotectonic domains: the south-western extremity of the Rhodesian craton, and the surrounding mobile belts– namely the Limpopo Mobile Belt to the south and the Shashi Mobile Belt to the west-southwest. The Mosetse-Matsitama area bears affinity to both these environments and this contribution attempts to assess the relationships of the area within the context of the regional geological framework. The area is underlain by a supracrustal schist belt which is interfolded with an infracrustal basement of gneisses and granitic rocks. The schist belt includes metasedimentary and probably metavolcanic rocks of low metamorphic grade and, therefore, contrasts sharply with the rocks of higher metamorphic grade which comprise the basement. Only in the south-west of the belt does a transitional relationship between the two major units occur. Geographical and geological criteria characteristic of both the major geotectonic environments are described, and it is concluded that the area shows a transition from a cratonic to a mobile belt environment. Involvement in a developing mobile belt would initially affect the infracrustal basement, allowing the supracrustal rocks to retain their cratonic characteristics to a more advanced stage.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , March 1970 , pp. 113 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anhaeusser, C. R., Mason, R., Viljoen, M. S. & Viljoen, R. P. 1968. A reappraisal of some aspects of Precambrian Shield geology. Econ. Geol. Res. Unit, Univ. Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Inform. Circ, 49, 1–30.Google Scholar
Clifford, T. N. 1963. The Damaran episode of tectonothermal activity in South West Africa and its regional significance in southern Africa. Inst. Afr. Geol., Leeds University, Ann. Rep. 7, 37–41.Google Scholar
Cox, K. G., Johnson, R. L., Monkman, L. J., Stillman, C. J., Vail, J. R. & Wood, D. N. 1965. The geology of the Nuanetsi Igneous Province. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 257, 71–218.Google Scholar
Crockett, R. N. 1965. The geology of the country around Mahalapye and Machaneng (Explanation of quarter degree sheets 2327A, 2327B and part of 2326B). Rec. geol. Surv. Bech. 1961–62, 77–99.Google Scholar
Crockett, R. N. 1968. Geology of the Shashi Area. Rept. geol. Surv. Botswana.Google Scholar
Crockett, R. N. & Mason, R. 1968. Foci of Mantle Disturbance in Southern Africa and their Economic Significance. Econ. Geol. 63, 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, A. 1951. The Sequence of Precambrian Orogenic belts in South and Central Africa. Int. geol. Congr. 18 (14), 254–269.Google Scholar
Nicolaysen, L. O. 1962. Stratigraphic interpretation of age measurements in southern Africa. ‘Petrologic Studies.’ Geol. Soc. Am., Buddington Vol, 569–589.Google Scholar
Pulvertaft, T. C. R. 1968. The Precambrian stratigraphy of Western Greenland. Int. geol. Congr., 23 (4), 89–107.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. 1962. Interference patterns produced by the superposition of folds of ‘Similar’ type. J. Geol. 60 (4) 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söhnge, P. G., Le Roux, H. D. & Nel, H. J. 1948. The geology of the country around Messina. Explanation of Sheet 46 (Messina). Geol. Surv. Dep. Min. S. Afr. 826.Google Scholar
Vail, J. R. 1965. An outline of the geochronology of the late Precambrian formations of eastern Central Africa. Proc. R. Soc. A, 284. 354–369.Google Scholar