Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:42:40.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation of the Ibex and Jamesoni Zones of the Lower Lias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In order to compare the ammonite sequence in the ibex and jamesoni zones of Pabay, recently described as vitiated by faulting and dykes, with the succession in other areas, it is desirable, first of all, to give full lists of the ammonites collected on the Dorset and Yorkshire coasts by Dr. W. D. Lang and Professor D. M. S. Watson and kindly submitted to the writer for examination.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 6 note 3 Spath, L. F., “On the Liassic Succession of Pabay, Inner Hebrides”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LIX, 1922, pp. 548–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 7 note 1 “The Lower Pliensbachian of Charmouth”: Geol. Mag., 1913, pp. 401–12.Google Scholar The Geology of the Charmouth Cliffs, Beach, and Foreshore”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xxv, 1914, pt. v, pp. 293360.Google Scholar “The Ibex-zone at Charmouth, etc.”: ib., vol. xxviii, 1917, pt. i, pp. 31–6.

page 7 note 2 Ammon. del Lias Medio dell'Apennino Centr.”: Pal. Ital., vol. v, 1899, p. 173, pl. xxii, figs. 2a, 2b.Google Scholar

page 8 note 1 Die Ammon. d. M. Lias v. Oestringen”: Mitt. Bad. Geol. Land. Anst., vol. ii, pt. ii, 1891, pl. xii, figs, lac only.Google Scholar

page 8 note 2 Foss. Strati Terebrat. Aspasia”: Pt. I, Soc. Sci. Nat. & Scon. Palermo, vol. xvi, 1884, pl. vi, fig. 19 only (non 16 = typus).Google Scholar

page 8 note 3 Ib., pl. vii, fig. 17 only (non 11 = typus).

page 9 note 1 Adopted in Buckman, , “Jurass. Chronol. I—Lias,” Q.J.G.S., vol lxxiii, 1918 (1919), p. 264.Google Scholar

page 9 note 2 “The Geology of the Country between Whitby and Scarborough”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 2nd ed., 1915, p. 69.Google Scholar

page 10 note 1 Ib., p. 71.

page 10 note 2 B.M. No. C 18115. Believed by the late Mr. G. C. Crick to be the specimen alluded to as a var. of Phylloceras loscombi by Blake (in Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 297).

page 10 note 3 In Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 280. (B.M. Nos. C 19223–4.)Google Scholar

page 10 note 4 The genus Coeloceras must be restricted to the Carixian pettos-group; for A. davoei, Sowerby, generally erroneously united with it, the new genus Prodactylioceras is proposed.

page 10 note 5 Loc. cit., 1915, p. 97.Google Scholar

page 10 note 6 e.g. Liparoceras heptangulare, Young & Bird, B.M. No. 17159, Ripley Coll.; L. striatum (Rein.), Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 281, B.M. No. C 18117.Google Scholar

page 11 note 1 Beitr. z. Kenntn. d. Capricorn, d. Österr. Alp.”: Sitzungsb. Math.- Naturw. Cl. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien., vol. xiii, 1854, p. 25, pl. iii, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 11 note 2 Üb. eine Mittellias. Ceph. Fauna a.d. N. Ö. Kleinasien”: Ann. k.k. Naturhist. Hofmus. Vienna, vol. xxvii, 1913, No. 3, p. 353, pl. xv, fig. 2.Google Scholar