Article contents
Correlation of the Ibex and Jamesoni Zones of the Lower Lias
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
In order to compare the ammonite sequence in the ibex and jamesoni zones of Pabay, recently described as vitiated by faulting and dykes, with the succession in other areas, it is desirable, first of all, to give full lists of the ammonites collected on the Dorset and Yorkshire coasts by Dr. W. D. Lang and Professor D. M. S. Watson and kindly submitted to the writer for examination.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923
References
page 6 note 3 Spath, L. F., “On the Liassic Succession of Pabay, Inner Hebrides”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LIX, 1922, pp. 548–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 7 note 1 “The Lower Pliensbachian of Charmouth”: Geol. Mag., 1913, pp. 401–12.Google Scholar “The Geology of the Charmouth Cliffs, Beach, and Foreshore”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xxv, 1914, pt. v, pp. 293–360.Google Scholar “The Ibex-zone at Charmouth, etc.”: ib., vol. xxviii, 1917, pt. i, pp. 31–6.
page 7 note 2 “Ammon. del Lias Medio dell'Apennino Centr.”: Pal. Ital., vol. v, 1899, p. 173, pl. xxii, figs. 2a, 2b.Google Scholar
page 8 note 1 “Die Ammon. d. M. Lias v. Oestringen”: Mitt. Bad. Geol. Land. Anst., vol. ii, pt. ii, 1891, pl. xii, figs, la–c only.Google Scholar
page 8 note 2 “Foss. Strati Terebrat. Aspasia”: Pt. I, Soc. Sci. Nat. & Scon. Palermo, vol. xvi, 1884, pl. vi, fig. 19 only (non 16 = typus).Google Scholar
page 8 note 3 Ib., pl. vii, fig. 17 only (non 11 = typus).
page 9 note 1 Adopted in Buckman, , “Jurass. Chronol. I—Lias,” Q.J.G.S., vol lxxiii, 1918 (1919), p. 264.Google Scholar
page 9 note 2 “The Geology of the Country between Whitby and Scarborough”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 2nd ed., 1915, p. 69.Google Scholar
page 10 note 1 Ib., p. 71.
page 10 note 2 B.M. No. C 18115. Believed by the late Mr. G. C. Crick to be the specimen alluded to as a var. of Phylloceras loscombi by Blake (in Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 297).
page 10 note 3 In Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 280. (B.M. Nos. C 19223–4.)Google Scholar
page 10 note 4 The genus Coeloceras must be restricted to the Carixian pettos-group; for A. davoei, Sowerby, generally erroneously united with it, the new genus Prodactylioceras is proposed.
page 10 note 5 Loc. cit., 1915, p. 97.Google Scholar
page 10 note 6 e.g. Liparoceras heptangulare, Young & Bird, B.M. No. 17159, Ripley Coll.; L. striatum (Rein.), Tate and Blake, 1876, p. 281, B.M. No. C 18117.Google Scholar
page 11 note 1 “Beitr. z. Kenntn. d. Capricorn, d. Österr. Alp.”: Sitzungsb. Math.- Naturw. Cl. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien., vol. xiii, 1854, p. 25, pl. iii, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar
page 11 note 2 “Üb. eine Mittellias. Ceph. Fauna a.d. N. Ö. Kleinasien”: Ann. k.k. Naturhist. Hofmus. Vienna, vol. xxvii, 1913, No. 3, p. 353, pl. xv, fig. 2.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by