We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Burchart, J.1981. Evaluation of uncertainties in fission track dating; some statistical and geochemical problems. Nuclear Tracks5, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, R. F.1981. On statistical models for fission track counts. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology13, 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, N. H. & Beckinsale, R. D.1983. Comments on the paper ‘ Fission track dating of British Ordovician and Silurian stratotypes’ by R. J. Ross and others. Geological Magazine120, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, N. H.1985. Numerical calibration of the Palaeozoic time scale: Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian periods. In Geochronology and the Geological Record (ed.Snelling, N.). Geological Society of London (in press).Google Scholar
Gleadow, A. J. W. & Lovering, J. F.1977. Geometry factor for external detectors in fission track dating. Nuclear Tracks1, 99–106.Google Scholar
Green, P. F. & Durrani, S. A.1978. A quantitative assessment of geometry factors for use in fission track studies. Nuclear Tracks2, 207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. F.1981a. A new look at statistics in fission track dating. Nuclear Tracks5, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. F.1981b. A criticism of the paper entitled ‘ A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method ’ by Johnson, McGee and Naeser. Nuclear Tracks5, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. F.1982. In reply to Johnson, McGee and Naeser. Nuclear Tracks6, 56–7.Google Scholar
Green, P. F.1984. In defence of the external detector method of fission track dating. Geological Magazine122, 73–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B.1983. More time scales. Geological Magazine120, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, A. J. & Green, P. F.1981. A reappraisal of neutron density and uranium-238 λ1 values in fission track dating. Nuclear Tracks5, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, A. J. & Green, P. F.1982. A users' guide to fission track dating calibration. Earth and Planetary Science Letters59, 343–54.Google Scholar
Hurford, A. J. & Green, P. F.1983. The zeta age calibration of fission track dating. Isotope Geoscience1, 285–317.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. M., Mcgee, V. E. & Naeser, C. W.1979. A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method. Nuclear Tracks3, 93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. M., Mcgee, V. E. & Naeser, C. W.1982. Reply to P. F. Green's criticism of‘ A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method’. Nuclear Tracks6, 53–7.Google Scholar
Mandel, J.1964. The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. New York: Wiley, Interscience.Google Scholar
Mckerrow, W. S., Lambert, R. St. J. & Chamberlain, V. E.1980. The Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian time scale. Earth and Planetary Science Letters51, 1–8.Google Scholar
Naeser, C. W., Hurford, A. J. & Gleadow, A. J. W.1977. Fission track dating of pumice from the KBS Tuff, East Rudolf, Kenya. Nature267, 649.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J., Naeser, C. W., Izett, G. A., Obradovich, J. D., Bassett, M. G., Hughes, C. P., Cocks, L. R. M., Dean, W. T., Ingham, J. K., Jenkins, C. J., Rickards, R. B., Sheldon, P. R., Toghill, P., Whittington, H. B. & Zalasiewicz, J.1982. Fission track dating of British Ordovician and Silurian stratotypes. Geological Magazine119, 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storzer, D. & Wagner, G. A.1982. The application of fission track dating in stratigraphy: a critical review. In Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy (ed. Odin, G. S.), pp. 199–224. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar