Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:30:47.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clay Mineralogy of Selected Clays from the English Wealden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. W. Tank
Affiliation:
Bloomington, Indiana.

Abstract

X-ray analyses of selected samples from the argillaceous subdivisions of the English Wealden indicate that illite, kaolinite, and mixed-layer structures are present in variable amounts. The clay mineral assemblage is thought to reflect parent material, weathering conditions in the source area, and possibly some degrading of the illite structure by the action of active waters in the depositional environment. The specific clay minerals are tentatively correlated with the palaeogeographical framework proposed by Allen (1954). It is suggested that the kaolinite was derived mainly from the Palaeozoic uplands, and the bulk of the illite and mixed-layer structures from the marginal Jurassic lowland.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, P., 1954. Geology and geography of the London-North Sea Uplands in Wealden times. Geol. Mag., 91, 498508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P., 1959. The Wealden environment: Anglo-Paris basin. Phil. Trans., B, 242, 283346.Google Scholar
Allen, P., 1961. The Hastings Beds deltas: recent progress and Easter field meeting report. Proc. Geol. Ass. Lond., 71.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. F., 1954. X-ray diffraction criteria for the characterization of chloritic material in sediments. Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci., Natl Res. Council, Pub. 327, 324334.Google Scholar
Brown, C. Q., and Ingram, R. L., 1954. Clay minerals of the Neuse River sediments. J. sediment. Petrol., 24, 196–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B., and Honeyborne, D. B., 1952. Bricks and clays of the Hastings Beds. Trans. Brit. Ceramic Soc., 51, 211259.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, F. L., 1944. Clay minerals in Lake Erie sediments. Amer. Min., 29, 378388.Google Scholar
Droste, J. B., 1956. Alteration of clay minerals by weathering in Wisconsin tills. Bull. geol. Soc. Amer., 67, 911–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droste, J. B., and Tharin, J. C., 1958. Alteration of clay minerals in Illinoian till by weathering. ibid., 69, 61–8.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E., and Johns, W. D., 1954. Clay mineral investigations of sediments in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci., Natl Res. Council, Publ. 327, 81103.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. S., and Hearn, W. E., 1942. Chemical and physical properties of some of the important alluvial soils of the Mississippi drainage basin. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull., 833.Google Scholar
Millot, G., 1953. Heritage et neoformation dans la sedimentation argileuse. C.R. Congr. Geol. Intern., 19th Session, 1952, Algiers, fascicule 18, 163175.Google Scholar
Murray, H. H., and Leininger, R. K., 1956. Effect of weathering on clay minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci., Natl. Res. Council., Pub. 456, 340–7.Google Scholar
Rolfe, B. N., 1957. Surficial sediments in Lake Mead. J. sediment. Petrol., 27, 378386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. C. M., 1959. The clays and heavy minerals of the Shotover Ironsand series. Proc. Geol. Ass., Lond., 70, 239253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. F., 1951. Vermiculite and some related mixed-layer minerals 199–223, in Brindley G. W., X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals, Mineralog. Soc. Great Britain Mon.Google Scholar