Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T21:05:54.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification of fault breccias and related fault rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2008

N. H. WOODCOCK  and
K. MORT
N. H. WOODCOCK*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK
K. MORT
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite extensive research on fault rocks, and on their commercial importance, there is no non-genetic classification of fault breccias that can easily be applied in the field. The present criterion for recognizing fault breccia as having no ‘primary cohesion’ is often difficult to assess. Instead we propose that fault breccia should be defined, as with sedimentary breccia, primarily by grain size: with at least 30% of its volume comprising clasts at least 2 mm in diameter. To subdivide fault breccias, we advocate the use of textural terms borrowed from the cave-collapse literature – crackle, mosaic and chaotic breccia – with bounds at 75% and 60% clast content. A secondary breccia discriminant, more difficult to apply in the field, is the ratio of cement to matrix between the clasts. Clast-size issues concerning fault gouge, cataclasite and mylonite are also discussed.

Keywords

brecciagougecataclasite
Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 145 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 435 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blenkinsop, T. G., Oliver, N. & Cihan, M. 2007. Quantifying fabric anisotropy in breccias: insights into brecciation in a mineralizing environment. EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 88 (52), Fall Meeting Supplement, MR21A-05.Google Scholar
Brodie, K., Fettes, D. & Harte, B. 2007. Structural terms including fault rock terms. In Metamorphic Rocks: a Classification and Glossary of Terms (eds Fettes, D. & Desmonds, J.), pp. 24–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, C. & James, P. 2003. Hydrothermal brecciation due to fluid pressure fluctuations: examples from the Olary Domain, South Australia. Tectonophysics 366, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, R. D. 1978. Reply on ‘Eastern Piedmont fault system: speculations on its extent’. Geology 6, 580–2.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, M. W. 1971. Cataclastic Rocks. Professional Paper, United States Geological Survey, no. 687, 97 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jébrak, M. 1997. Hydrothermal breccias in vein-type ore deposits; a review of mechanisms, morphology and size distribution. Ore Geology Reviews 12, 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killick, A. M. 2003. Fault rock classification: an aid to structural interpretation in mine and exploration geology. South African Journal of Geology 106, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koša, E., Hunt, D., Fitchen, W. M., Bockel-Rebelle, M.-O. & Roberts, G. 2003. The heterogeneity of palaeocavern systems developed along syndepositional fault zones: the Upper Permian Capitan Platform, Guadalupe Mountains, U.S.A. In Permo-Carboniferous Carbonate Platforms and Reefs (eds Ahr, W. M., Harris, P. M., Morgan, W. A. & Somerville, I. D.), pp. 291–322. Special Publication of the Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, volume 78.Google Scholar
Laznicka, P. 1988. Breccias and Coarse Fragmentites. Petrology, Environments, Associations, Ores. Developments in Economic Geology Series Volume 25. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 832 pp.Google Scholar
Loucks, R. G. 1999. Paleocave carbonate reservoirs: origins, burial-depth modifications, spatial complexity, and reservoir implications. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 83, 1795–834.Google Scholar
Mort, K. & Woodcock, N. H. 2008. Quantifying fault breccia geometry: Dent Fault, NW England. Journal of Structural Geology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North American Geologic-map Data Model Science Language Technical Team . 2004. Report on progress to develop a North American science-language standard for digital geologic-map databases; Appendix B: Classification of metamorphic and other composite-genesis rocks, including hydrothermally altered, impact-metamorphic, mylonitic, and cataclastic rocks. In Digital Mapping Techniques '04 – Workshop Proceedings (ed. Soller, D. R. ), pp. 85–94. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report no. 2004–1451.Google Scholar
Passchier, C. W. & Trouw, R. A. J. 1996. Microtectonics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 366 pp.Google Scholar
Robertson, S. 1999. BGS Rock Classification Scheme, Volume 2: Classification of Metamorphic Rocks. British Geological Survey Research Report RR 99-02, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Schmid, S. M. & Handy, M. R. 1991. Towards a genetic classification of fault rocks: geological usage and tectonophysical implications. In Controversies in Modern Geology (eds Müller, D. W., McKenzie, J. A. & Weissert, H.). pp. 339–61. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sibson, R. H. 1977. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. Journal of the Geological Society, London 133, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibson, R. H. 1986. Brecciation processes in fault zones: inferences from earthquake rupturing. Pure and Applied Geophysics 124, 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoke, A. W., Tullis, J. & Todd, V. R. 1998. Fault-Related Rocks. A Photographic Atlas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 617 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spry, A. 1969. Metamorphic Textures. London: Pergamon, 350 pp.Google Scholar
Tarasewicz, J. P. T., Woodcock, N. H. & Dickson, J. A. D. 2005. Carbonate dilation breccias: examples from the damage zone to the Dent Fault, northwest England. Geological Society of America Bulletin 117, 736–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. G. 1992. Ore Textures, Recognition & Interpretation: Volume 1, Infill Textures. Townsville, Australia: Economic Geology Research Unit, 58 pp.Google Scholar
Wentworth, C. K. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology 30, 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. D. L. & Houghton, B. F. 2006. Primary volcaniclastic rocks. Geology 34, 677–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. 1982. Fault rocks of the Moine Thrust Zone: a guide to their nomenclature. Textures and Microstructures 4, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, D. U., Dunn, D. U., Engelder, J. T., Geiser, P. A., Hatcher, R. D., Kish, S. A., Odom, A. L. & Schamel, S. 1984. Fault-related rocks: suggestions for terminology. Geology 12, 391–4.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, N. H., Omma, J. E. & Dickson, J. A. D. 2006. Chaotic breccia along the Dent Fault, NW England: implosion or collapse of a fault void? Journal of the Geological Society, London 163, 431–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar