Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:22:08.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Base and Top of the Coral-rock in Barbados

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

1. The coral-rock commences nearly everywhere with a basal bed of varying thickness containing a fauna of pre-Pleistocene aspect among which the genus Haliotis (absent from these coasts at the present day), Pleurotomaria, Meiocardia, etc., are noticeable. This faunule may have lived at a depth of 700–1,000 feet.

2. The supposition that the southerly anticlines are a later uplift than the main portion of Barbados is supported by the absence of ravines, and the presence of post-coral-rock beds which occur as coastal veneers at low altitudes, and in greater thickness in the south-east corner near Whitehaven.

3. The south-east part of the island from Consett Point to Ragged Point has probably extended further seawards in comparatively recent times ; the series of converging faults and dislocations in the cliff sections suggest that the thrusts from the west or south-west may have been resisted by this part of the island.

4. The relative claims of fault-scarping or marine erosion in production of the rising terraces is discussed ; and new information regarding the thickness of the coral-rock at sea-level from a boring is detailed.

5. The finding of a faunule with Pliocene or possibly Miocene affinities at the base of the coral-rock puts the Oceanic series further back, into the Miocene.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 337 note 1 Agricultural Journal, Dept. of Science and Agriculture, Barbados, 3, No. 3, 07, 1934, 34.Google Scholar

page 338 note 1 The Uplift of Barbados,” Geol. Mag., LXX, 1933, 46.Google Scholar

page 348 note 1 Lehner, M. E., “Introd. à la géologie de Trinidad,” Annales de l' Office des Combustibles lignites, No. 4, Paris, 1935, 695.Google Scholar

page 348 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlv, 1889, 641.Google Scholar

page 351 note 1 Geol. Mag. , LXXII, 1935, 541, pl. xxi, fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 352 note 1 Bull. Amer. Pal., No. 39, ix, 1922, 161, pl. 15, fig. 12.Google Scholar

page 352 note 2 “Contrib. to Geol. and Pal. of West Indies,” Carnegie Inst. of Washington, p. 135, pl. 13, fig. 5.Google Scholar

page 353 note 1 Bull. Amer. Pal., No. 49, 13, 1927, 25, pls. 14–15.Google Scholar

page 353 note 2 Tert. Fauna Florida, iii, part 4, 1898, 707, pl. 34, fig. 5.Google Scholar

page 354 note 1 Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 37, 1889, p. 54, pl. 40, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 354 note 2 New Brachiopods, Smithsonian Miscell. Coll., 91. No. 10, 1934, 1, pi. i, figs. 1–8.Google Scholar

page 354 note 3 Geol. Mag., LXVII, 1930, 213, pl. 12, figs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar

page 356 note 1 The only previous reference to these beds I can find is Jukes-Browne and Harrison, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlvii, 1891, 217, where small corals and land shells are mentioned from Culpepper Island.Google Scholar