Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:05:24.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allometric Growth in Dielasma hastata from Treak Cliff, Derbyshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Donald Parkinson
Donald Parkinson
Affiliation:
129 Monmouth Drive, Sutton Coldfield.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth and variation in a single species from a thin bed at one locality are examined statistically. The different dimensions are shown to be allometrically related both to each other and to the volume of the shell. It is argued that total width is the best measure of age of the individual and it is shown that at a certain width there is a break in the continuity of growth of the length and thickness.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , June 1952 , pp. 201 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burma, B. H., 1948. Studies in Quantitative Paleontology. Journ. Paleont., xxii, 725–61.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., 1951. The Brachiopoda of Martin's Petrificata derbiensia. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 12, iv, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, D., 1946. The Lower Carboniferous of the Castleton district, Derbyshire. Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., xxvii, 99–124.Google Scholar
Shirley, J., and Horsfield, E. L., 1940. The Carboniferous Limestone of the Castleton-Bradwell area, North Derbyshire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xcvi, 271–299.Google Scholar
Weller, S., 1914. The Mississippian Brachiopoda of the Mississippi Valley basin. Mon. State Geol. Surv., Illinois, i, 1–508.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, S., and others, 1951. A discussion on the Measurement of Growth and Form. Proc. Roy. Soc., B, cxxxvii, 433–523.Google Scholar