Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:33:11.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Age of the Hirnant Beds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Gertrude L. Elles
Gertrude L. Elles
Affiliation:
Fellow of Newnham College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The age of the Hirnant Beds has for a long time been a matter of uncertainty, occurring as they do at the junction of the Ordovician with the Silurian. They were originally included by Sedgwick in his “Upper Bala”, and in the Memoir of the Geological Survey on North Wales they are grouped with the Bala, and therefore in a modern classification would be relegated to the Ordovician. In 1879, however, Ruddy stated that the grits representing the gritty facies of these beds in the northern part of the area were the same as those coloured Lower Llandovery on the Geological Survey map, and he then held this view of their age, though later, in 1885, the placed them at the top of the “Caradoc or Bala Series”. Hughes also regarded the Hirnant Beds as representing the base of the Silurian, though he regarded the Ashgill Shales of Fairy Gill and elsewhere as Ordovician. Marr has also always regarded the Ashgill Shales of Fairy Gill as “Upper Bala”, and has included them in his Ashgillian division at the top of the Ordovician. It is perhaps significant that Salter in his Catalogue includes the fossils from both sets of beds in the “Upper Bala”, but divides this into two: (a) The Hirnant Limestone and Llanfyllin Beds. (b) The Llandovery (Lower Llandovery of the Survey).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 59 , Issue 9 , September 1922 , pp. 409 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 409 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. i, 1845, p. 6.Google Scholar

page 409 note 2 Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. iii, 1866 and 1881 (2nd edition).Google Scholar

page 409 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxv, 1879, p. 200.Google Scholar

page 409 note 4 Proc. Chester Soc. Nat. Hist., No. 3, 1885, p. 113.Google Scholar

page 409 note 5 Proc. Chester Soc. Nat. Hist., pt. iv, 1893, p. 141.Google Scholar

page 409 note 6 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxix, 1913, p. 1; and Quart Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxi, 1916, p. 189.Google Scholar

page 409 note 7 Cat. of Cambrian and Silurian Fossils, 1873, p. 72.Google Scholar

page 409 note 8 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxviii, 1922, p. 132.Google Scholar

page 413 note 1 Elles, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxv, 1909, p. 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 413 note 2 Jones, , “Gothlandian or Silurian (Great Britain)”: Handbuch der Regionalen Geologie, Bd. iii, i, 1917, p. 85.Google Scholar