Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The paucity of animal remains in the Coal-measures of Somerset has been recognized for many years. More recently Dr. H. Bolton has described fossils from various horizons in the coalfield, but his records relate chiefly to insects and marine fossils, while non-marine Lamellibranchs appear to be unusually rare at most horizons. A number of species of non-marine Lamellibranchs have been recorded by various authors, but in view of the wide interpretation formerly given to the various species, many of these records cannot be used for zonal purposes.
page 499 note 1 Morris, J., “On Organic Remains in the Somersetshire Coalfield”: Geol. Mag., Vol. V, 1868, p. 356Google Scholar.
page 499 note 2 Bolton, H., “On a Marine Fauna in the Basement Beds of the Bristol Coal-field”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxiii, 1907, p. 445;CrossRefGoogle Scholar “Faunal Horizons in the Bristol Coalfield”: ibid., vol. lxvii, 1911, p. 316.
page 499 note 3 Bolton, H. op. cit., 1911, p. 327.Google Scholar
page 499 note 4 Watson, D. M. S., “Anthracomya in the Radstock Coal Measures”: Geol. Mag., 1906, p. 336; Bolton, op. cit., 1911, p. 323, and pl. xxviiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 501 note 1 Hind, Wheelton, “A Monograph on Carbonicola, Anthracomya, and Naiadites”: Pal. Soc., 1895, p. 105Google Scholar.
page 501 note 2 Davies, J. H. and Trueman, A. E., “A Revision of the Non-Marine Lamellibranchs of the Coal Measures, etc”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxxiii, 1927, p. 245Google Scholar.
page 501 note 3 Crookall, R., “On the Fossil Flora of the Bristol and Somerset Coalfield”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LXII, 1925, p. 398Google Scholar.
page 501 note 4 Anthracomya phillipsii was recorded by MessrsCantrill, T. C. and Pringle, J. at a depth of between 580 and 600 feet in a boring at Hemington, Somerset (Summary of Progress of Geol. Surv., 1913–1914, pp. 100–1). Dr. F. L. Kitchin has kindly allowed us to examine the specimens referred to, which are in the collection of the Geological Survey (Pl. 1673). The material is badly preserved; it includes A. cf. phillipsii but we are not able to recognize A. tenuis or any other speciesGoogle Scholar.