No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The most important addition to the fossil flora of the Bajo de Velis (which locality I visited from Dec., 1894, to March, 1895) is the discovery of Rhipidopsis gingkoides, Schmalh., and R. densinervis, Fstm., each represented by well-preserved leaves and numerous fruits. Both species are met with in the Damudas of India—R. densinervis in the Rániganj (Kámthi group), R. gingkoides in the Barákar (Duranga Coalfield), the latter together with Cyclopitys dichotoma, Fstm. (this curious type was detected by my friend and colleague, Dr. Bodenbender, in the Sierra de Los Llanos, in the south of the province of La Rioja).
page 446 note 1 Kosmovsky, C., “Quelques mots sur les couches à végétaux fossiles dans la Russie orientale et dans la Sibérie”: Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. de Moscou, 1891, No. 1, pp. 170–7.Google Scholar
page 447 note 1 The plant from Retavisto, in the province of San Juan, which Szajnocha (Sitzungsber. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Bd. C, Abth. i, p. 5) considered to be this species, belongs rather to a type of the Culm, perhaps to L. Volkmanni, Sternb. (Zeiller, R., Bull. Soc. Geol. France, J. xxiii, 1895, p. 608.Google Scholar)
page 447 note 2 He is rather inclined even to include Retavisto, which I take to be Lower Carboniferous (Culm).
page 448 note 1 The Thinnfeldia odontopteroides of the Upper Gondwánas is—as far as one may judge from the drawings in the Gondwána Flora (Pal. Ind.)—rather a doubtful form.