^{page 509 note 1} Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1907, vol. lxiii, pp. 383–444.Google Scholar

^{page 510 note 1} At first I thought the clay-bed might come below the Striatulum-Bed, making it pre-striatuli, but then an alternative explanation suggested itself, which was graphically represented on p.392 of my main paper. Unfortunately, however, the statement of the earlier view (lines 15–17 from bottom of p. 391) escaped the necessary qualification.

^{page 511 note 1} The statement in my main paper (p. 420)—“but how thick it was, or whether it rests directly upon the ‘grit’, or was separated therefrom by the Upper Coral-Bed …”—was inadvertently transcribed from notes made before I had satisfied myself about the correct position of the Upper Coral-Bed and should be erased.

^{page 511 note 2} Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1893, vol. xlix, p. 484.Google Scholar