Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:36:14.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—On the Foraminifera and Sponges of the Upper Greensand of Cambridge1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. Johnson Sollas
Affiliation:
Associate of the Royal School of Mines, London, Scholar of St. John's College, Cambridge

Extract

The Upper Greensand of Cambridge occurs as a thin but very important bed, covering the eroded surface of the Gault, and blending upwards into the overlying Chalk-marl. It consists essentially of Chalk-marl, saturated with green grains of Glauconite, and crowded with a variety of fossils. The fossils in great part derive their origin from the Gault, out of which they have been concentrated by a natural process of levigation. At the time when the Gault sea was shallowing to its close, its submarine shores became eroded by a cold current flowing from the north, which bore away its lighter sedimentary clay, and left its imbedded fossils behind, to be subsequently rolled into the sublittoral deposit of the Upper Greensand. Thus it happens that in our neighbourhood the uppermost beds of the Gault are not to be found, and their only representative is this mere pebble-bed at the base of the Chalk. The rich fauna in our formation thus collected ready to the hand of the Palæontologist has been well worked out in its higher developments by Mr. Barret, Mr. Seeley, and various other observers. Of the Protista and Cœlenterata, however, some departments have been left all but untouched; and it is to the Sponges of the latter and the Foraminifera of the former that my paper refers. The Foraminifera occur abundantly, and in a rich variety, which seems to anticipate their more luxuriant appearance in the succeeding Chalk. The Vitrea perforata are represented by large forms of Bulimina, Textularia, and Orthocerina, which mimic truly arenaceous foraminifera by imbedding the siliceous and volcanic sand of the formation in their tests.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1873

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Read before the Cambridge Phil. Soc., March, 1873.

References

page 269 note 1 Mr. Bonney, however, expressed his belief that many of the green grains would be found to owe their origin to Foraminifera.—Proceedings Geol. Assoc, vol. iii., no. 1, p. 5.

page 269 note 2 Geol. Mag. Vol. III., p. 305, 1866.

page 270 note 1 Geological Survey of Canada, Edition 1863, p. 461.

page 271 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., Kev. O. Fisher, vol. xxix., p. 52; and W. J. Sollas, vol. xxviii., p. 397, and vol. xxix., p. 76.

page 272 note 1 A descriptive account of four subspherous sponges, Arabian and British. J. H. Carter, F.R.S., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. iv., p. 1, 1869.

page 273 note 1 Fossil sponge spicules. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. vi. p. 192, 1870, and Devon Assoc. Advt. Science, Lit., and Art, 26th July, 1870.

page 273 note 2 Geological Survey of Canada, loc. cit.

page 273 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxix., p. 63.

page 274 note 1 Essex Inst., Salem, Mass., Bull. vol. i., p. 11, 1866. Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist., New York, vol. x., p. 225, 1871. Quart. Journ. Micr. Soc., new ser. no. xlv., p. 71.