Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:53:37.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VI.–Rutile in Fireclays—Reply to Major-General MacMahon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In the June Number of the GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE, p. 259, Major-General MacMahon deals with my paper on fireclays, etc., and raises, with much fairness, several objections to some of my interpretations and inferences. Some of the criticisms are exactly what I should expect to be made, and were more or less present in my own mind, so that I can well see how they may arise in the minds of others.

General MacMahon appears to have somewhat overstated my views as to the “dynamic” part of the “Metamorphism” in question, owing to taking all I say as equally applying to slates and clays, which is not the case. Thus, the paragraphs he refers to on p. 168 will, I think, plainly show that I distinguish between what has taken place in clays and allied shales, and what has taken place in slates; and passages in my previous paper make this still more evident.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1891

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)