No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
During a stay of nearly six weeks, made last July and August, at the Lizard, Cornwall, I had ample opportunity of correcting former, and making some fresh observations.
With regard to the first of these, and to some of the strictures recently passed on them, I found that I had little or nothing to regret as to what I had already written on the subject, with the exception of the “felsitic-like-rock” at Housel Cove, which I should now rather regard as a mass segregated, or separated out of the common magma, common magma, than as an altered portion of the hornblende-schist as I then described it—my object at the time being to show that it was not a dyke; a view I am still convinced of. I now pass on to recent observations.
page 365 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. 40, 1884, p. 463Google Scholar.
page 366 note 1 Geol. Mag. Vol. VI. 1889, p. 425.Google Scholar
page 366 note 2 Geol. Mag. 1890, Vol. VII. p. 163.Google Scholar
page 367 note 1 As the locality of this dyke or vein is rather difficult to find, the Serpentine worker in the Cove can guide anyone to it.