Prof. Blake's book is a valuable work of reference; but the criticisms appear to be both hurried and inaccurate. In the notice of my Monograph the title is incorrectly given: there are certain other clerical errors; and some mistakes which a little more investigation would have prevented.

While placing his comments in brackets, it is unfortunate that Prof. Blake has not found some means to distinguish between remarks based upon the author's words, and statements of his own. This is especially noticeable in the “critical digest” of Haugia, where remarks, which appear as if they originated with Prof. Blake, are really my statements in another form.