^{page 214 note 1} Brit. Assoc. Report, 1871. Obs. Luminous Meteors, 37.

^{page 214 note 2} Brit. Assoc. Report, 1871. Obs. Luminous Meteors, 36.

^{page 214 note 3} Brit. Assoc. Report, 1871. Obs. Luminous Meteors, 36.

^{page 214 note 4} Pisani, F.. Compt. rend., lxxix. 1507Google Scholar.—Daubrée, G. A.. Compt. rend., lxxix. 1509.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 1} Nature, November 30, 1871.—Greg, B. P.. Brit. Assoc. Report, 1872, 79.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 2} Daubrée, G. A. and Everwijn, R.. Compt. rend., lxxv. 1676.Google Scholar

^{page 216 note 3} Annals des Mines, xix. (1869), 29.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 1} Smith, J. L.. Amer. Jour. Sc., 1871, 335Google Scholar. See also Burkart, H. J.. Neues Jahr. Min., 1871, 853Google Scholar. Urgindi, J.. Amer. Jour. sc., 1872, iii. 209.Google Scholar

^{page 217 note 2} This is probably the meteoric iron of which earlier mention is made by W. H. Hardy in his Travels in the Interior of Mexico in 1825–1828, London, 1829, 481.

^{page 217 note 3} Burkart gives the date 1828.

^{page 218 note 1} The Great Zone Land. By Butler, W. F.. London: Sampson Low. 1872 Page 304.Google Scholar

^{page 219 note 1} Tschermak, G.. Mineralog. Mitt., Jahrgang 1872Google Scholar.—Smith, J. L., Am. Jour. Sc., 1874, vii. 395.Google Scholar

^{page 219 note 2} L'Union libérale, Tours, 26th July, 1872.—Le Loir, 4th August, 1872.—Tastes, M. De. Compt. rend., lxxix. 273.Google Scholar—Daubree, G. A.. Compt. rend., lxxv. 308 and 465.Google Scholar—Daubrée, G. A. and Jolly, M.. Compt. rend., lxxv. 505Google Scholar.—Fleury, P. de. Note sur les Météores d'origine cosmique a propos de l' Aérolithe du 23 Juillet, 1872. Blois: Imp. P. Dufresne, 1872.Google Scholar—Daubrée, G. A.. Compt. rent., lxxix. 277Google Scholar.—L'institut, August 5th, 1874.—La Nature, ii. 159.Google Scholar

^{page 220 note 1} A similar instance of the division of a meteor into two during its passage through the atmosphere (which may be represented thus —*—*) was observed at the Nicobars, 1874, May 31st, 5·30 p.m. (Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1874, No. viii. 156.)Google Scholar

^{page 221 note 1} Scheere rfound this chloride in the meteorite of Stannern (Jour, de Phys., lxi., 469).—In some hailstones which fell 1871, August 20th, 11 a.m., at Zurich, and some of which weighed 12 grains, Kenngott found cubes or fragments of cubes of sodium chloride. He believed that they might have been carried by the wind from North Africa.Google Scholar

^{page 222 note 1} Secchi, A.. Compt. rend., lxxv. 655Google Scholar.— G. S. Ferrari. Richerche fisico-astronomiche intorno all' Uranolito caduto nell' agro Romano il 31 di Agosto, 1872. Roma: Tip. Bell. Arti. 1873.—Keller, P.. Fogg. Ann., cl. 171Google Scholar. Mineralog. Mitt., 1874, 258.—de Rossi, M. le Chevalier Michel-Etienne and Bellucci, G.. Alti dell' Ace. pontif. di nuovi Lincei, 1873Google Scholar.—Les Mondes, 25th December, 1873.—Sipöcz, L.. Mineralog. Mitt., 1874, 244.Google Scholar—Tschermak, G.. Sitz. Ah. Wiss. Wien, lxx. 11 Heft, 1874.Google Scholar

^{page 225 note 1} Penny, H. D.. Brit. Assoc. Report, 1873, Obs. Luminous Meteors, 369.Google Scholar

^{page 225 note 2} Gardiner, E. B.. Brit. Assoc. Report, 1873, Obs. Luminous Meteors, 365.Google Scholar