Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:58:35.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tectonic Development of the Western Weald in Lower Cretaceous Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. F. Kirkaldy
J. F. Kirkaldy
Affiliation:
King’s College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Modern detailed stratigraphical studies have demonstrated very clearly the long and involved tectonic history of the majority of the main structural units of England. It has been proved that, in certain areas, the thickness and the lithology of the sediments were partly determined by repeated pene-contemporaneous folding along definite axes, and thus it has been possible to trace the gradual growth of some of the main fold lines of the country. The Weald is typical of these areas, whose structure, at first sight simple enough, reveals on closer study much complexity of the minor folding and faulting and also gives evidence of long continued movement along certain lines; movement contemporaneous with the deposition of beds which were involved in the final crescendo of tectonic activity.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , June 1933 , pp. 254 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Lamplugh, G. W., and Kitchin, F. L. “On the Mesozic Rocks in Kent”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1911, 89–94.Google Scholar
(2)Pruvost, P., and Pringle, P. “A synopsis of the Geology of the Boulonnais”: P.G.A., xxxv, 1924, 37.Google Scholar
(3)Lamplugh, G. W., and Kitchin, F. L. “The Concealed Mesozoic Rocks in Kent”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1923, 17.Google Scholar
(4)Dines, H. G., and Edmunds, F. H. “The Geology of the Country Around Aldershot and Guildford”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1929, 23–4, and fig. 5.Google Scholar
(5)Meÿer, C. J. A. “On the Lower Greensand of Godalming”: P.G.A., Sup., i, 1868, 10–15.Google Scholar
(6)Wooldridge, S. W. “The Structural Evolution of the London Basin”: P.G.A., xxxvii, 1926, 167, fig. 15.Google Scholar
(7)Gossling, F. “The Geology of the Country around Reigate”: P.G.A., xl, 1929, 220–1.Google Scholar
(8)Hayward, H. A. “The Geology of the Lower Greensand in the Dorking-Leigh Hill District”: P.G.A., xliii, 1932, 14.Google Scholar
(9)Barrell, J. “Rhythms and Measurements of Geologic Time”: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., xxviii, 1917, 778.Google Scholar
(10)Evans, J. W. “Regions of Compression”: Q.J.G.S., lxxxii, 1926, xcv.Google Scholar
(11)Wooldridge, S. W. “The Minor Structures of the London Basin”: P.G.A., xxxiv, 1923.Google Scholar
(12)Kirkaldy, J. F. “The Geology of the Country around Hascombe, Surrey”: P.G.A., xliii, 1932, 128.Google Scholar
(13)Martin, P. J. A Geological Memoir of a Part of Western Sussex, London, 1828, 59–61.Google Scholar
(14)SirLyell, C. Principles of Geology, iv, 5th ed., London, 1837, 237–243.Google Scholar
(15)Linton, D. L. “The Oriein of the Wessex Rivers”: Scot. Geol. Mag., xlviii, 1932, 151, fig. 1.Google Scholar
(16)Davison, C. A History of British Earthquakes, Cambridge, 1924, 328–332.Google Scholar