Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:00:57.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The significance of toolmarks on a Silurian erosional furrow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. H. Bridges
P. H. Bridges
Affiliation:
Sedimentology Research Laboratory, The University, Whiteknights, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The toolmark pattern on an erosional furrow from the Llandovery shelf sequence in the Welsh Borderland indicates that there was:— (i) local helical flow within the furrow similar to that found in sinuous alluvial streams and (ii) a moderately powerful current which moved towards the shore. Erosion by a shallow water turbidity current or storm surge tidal ebb flow therefore seems unlikely. A flood tidal current super-imposed on storm wave oscillatory disturbance of the sea-floor provides a possible mechanism.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 109 , Issue 5 , September 1972 , pp. 405 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagnold, R. A. 1947. Sand movement by waves: some small scale experiments with sand of very low density. J. Instn. Civ. Eng. Paper 5554, 447–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curray, J. R. 1956. The analysis of two-dimensional orientation data. J. Geol. 64, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, L. 1967. Wave activity at the sea-bed around northwestern Europe. Marine Geol. 5, 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldring, R. 1971. Shallow water sedimentation: as illustrated in the Upper Devonian Baggy Beds. Mem. geol. Soc. Lond. 5, 80 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greensmith, J. T. & Tucker, E. V. 1966. Morphology and evolution of inshore shell ridges and mud mounds on modern intertidal flats, near Bradwell, Essex. Proc. Geol. Ass. 77, 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, M. L. 1964. Wave induced bottom currents in the Celtic Sea. Marine Geol. 2, 164–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häntzschel, W. & Reineck, H-E. 1968. Fazies-Untersuchungen im Hettangium von Helmstedt (Niedersachsen). Mitt. geol. St. Inst. Hamb. 37, 5–39.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. D. 1962. Erosion of tidal flats near Georgetown, British Guiana. Nature, Lond. 196, 128–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, N. H. 1970. The origin of some transverse sand patches in the Celtic Sea. Geol. Mag. 107, 389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenen, Ph. H. 1966. Experimental turbidite lamination in a circular flume. J. Geol. 74, 523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B. & Wolman, M. G. 1960. River Meanders. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 71, 769–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrman, J. O. 1964. Lake Vättern. Investigations on shore and bottom morphology. Meddn. Upps. Univ. geogr. Instn. 194, 1–238.Google Scholar
Postma, H. 1967. Sediment transport and sedimentation in the estuarine environment. In Lauff, G. H. (Ed.): Estuaries Publs. Am. Ass. Advmt. Sci. 83, 158.Google Scholar
Reineck, H-E. & Singh, I. B. 1972. Genesis of laminated sand and graded rhythmites in storm-sand layers of shelf mud. Sedimentology, 18, 123–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., Banford, R. B., Dill, C. E. & Avignone, N. E. 1971. Textural differentiation on the shoreface during erosional retreat of an unconsolidated coast, Cape Henry to Cape Hatteras, Western North Atlantic shelf. Sedimentology, 16, 221–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. H. McD, 1965. Primary sedimentary structures from the Silurian and Lower Devonian of the Oslo region, Norway. Nature, Lond. 207, 709–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M. & Bambach, R. K. 1968. The composition and structure of Lower Silurian marine communities. Lethaia 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Cocks, L. R. M. & McKerrow, W. S. 1968. The Llandovery transgression of the Welsh Borderland. Palaeontology, 11, 736–82.Google Scholar