Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:27:46.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

River Profiles and Denudation-Chronology in Southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. W. Wooldridge  and
J. F. Kirkaldy
S. W. Wooldridge
Affiliation:
King's College, London.
J. F. Kirkaldy
Affiliation:
King's College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE purpose of this paper is to present briefly some conclusions drawn from a study of the longitudinal profiles of rivers in the south of England. In the view of the authors, the study of such profiles affords an important though neglected method of attack on the vexed problems of Pleistocene chronology, and it bids fair also to throw light on certain larger geophysical topics, and particularly on the theory of eustatic movements of sea-level.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , January 1936 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bury, H., 1923. “Some Aspects of the Hampshire Plateau Gravels,” Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, iv, 15.Google Scholar
(2)Bury, H., 1933. “The Plateau Gravels of the Bournemouth Area,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xliv, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Crickmay, C. M., 1933. “The Later Stages of the Cycle of Erosion,” Geol. Mag., LXX, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Dewey, H., 1925. “The Palaeolithic Gravels of Sturry,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxvi, 278.Google Scholar
(5)Green, J. F. N., and others, 1934. “The River Mole; its Physiography and Superficial Deposits,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xlv, 35.Google Scholar
(6)Osborne White, H. J., 1912. “The Geology of the Country around Winchester and Stockbridge,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(7)Osborne White, H. J., 1913. “The Geology of the country near Farnham and Havant,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(8)Osborne White, H. J., 1915. “The Geology of the country near Lymington and Portsmouth,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(9)Osborne White, H. J., 1917. “The Geology of the country around Bournemouth,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(10)Palmer, L. S., and Cook, J. H., 1923. “The Pleistocene Deposits of the Portsmouth District and their Relation to Man,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxiv, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Reid, C., 1902. “The Geology of the country around Ringwood,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(12)Reid, C., 1902. “The Geology of the country around Southampton,” Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
(13)Smith, R. A., 1933. “Implements from High-Level Gravel near Canterbury,” Proc. Prehist. Soc E. Anglia, vii, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Knopf, E. B., 1924. “Correlation of Residual Erosion Surfaces in the Eastern Appalachian Highlands,” Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxxv, 636.Google Scholar