Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:43:14.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reverse and Oscillatory Zoning in Plagioclase Felspars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Edwin Sherbon Hills
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Extract

The importance of accurate knowledge concerning the causes of composition zoning in plagioclases lies in the possibility that such zoning may throw light on the magmatic history of the rock of which the zoned felspar is a component. The interpretation of plagioclase zoning has been the subject of much speculation among petrologists, Phemister having recently contributed (1934) a valuable discussion of earlier work, together with certain new suggestions as to the probable causes of the reverse and oscillatory types. My own attention was drawn to oscillatory zoning while studying the Upper Devonian igneous complex of Marysville, Victoria (Hills, 1932, pp. 152, 153), and I found the hypotheses suggested by Phemister and by Harloff (1927) to explain this enlightening. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the real significance of some of the processes postulated by both these workers has not been correctly indicated, and that the mechanism proposed by Phemister to account for oscillatory-normal zoning is not theoretically possible. Since it is important that the physico-chemical basis of such hypotheses be sound, a discussion of Phemister's and Harloff's theories, and certain other possible causes of reverse zoning is given below.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bowen, N. L., 1913. “The Melting Phenomena of the Plagioclase Feldspars,” Amer. Journ. Sci., 4, xxxv, 577599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. L., 1929. The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks, Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Day, A. L., and Allen, E. T., 1905. “The Isomorphism and Thermal Properties of the Feldspars,” Carnegie Inst., Washington, Pub. No. 31.Google Scholar
Harker, A., 1909. The Natural History of Igneous Rocks, Methuen and Co., London.Google Scholar
Harloff, C., 1927. “Zonal Structure in Plagioclases,” Leid. Geol. Med., ii, 99114.Google Scholar
Herz, R., 1892. “Ueber die Zonarstruktur der Plagioclase,” T.M.P.M., xiii (n.f.), 343–8.Google Scholar
Phemister, J., 1934. “Zoning in Plagioclase Felspar,” Min. Mag., xxiii, 541555.Google Scholar
Rastall, R. H., 1927. Physico-Chemical Geology, Edward Arnold and Co., London.Google Scholar
VÄyrynen, H., 1923. “Petrographische Untersuchungen der Granitodioritischen Gesteine Süd-ostbotlmiens,” Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 57.Google Scholar