Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:53:49.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinterpretation of ceratitic ammonoids from the Greville Formation, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. M. Furnish ,
B. F. Glenister ,
B. Kummel ,
C. Spinosa ,
W. Sweet  and
C. Teichert
W. M. Furnish
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, U.S.A.
B. F. Glenister
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, U.S.A.
B. Kummel
Affiliation:
Harvard University, U.S.A.
C. Spinosa
Affiliation:
Boise State University, Idaho, U.S.A.
W. Sweet
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, U.S.A.
C. Teichert
Affiliation:
University of Kansas, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ceratitic ammonoids from the Greville Formation in the Nelson Regional Syncline, South Island of New Zealand, were described as a new genus and species of the Ophiceratidae, Durvilleoceras woodmani, and dated as ‘late Middle Permian’ (Waterhouse, 1973). In fact, Durvilleoceras differs from all known Permian ammonoids in both conch form and sutural pattern, but closely resembles lower Triassic ceratites. Structural and sedimentologic complexities within the Nelson Syncline are such that stratigraphic interpretations are questionable, and the fauna of both the Greville and adjacent formations is sparse. Consequently, we consider that Durvilleoceras is best interpreted as a middle Scythian ceratite of the family Flemingitidae.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 39 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chao, King-Koo 1965. The Permian ammonoid-bearing formations of South China. Scientia Sinica 14, 1813–25.Google Scholar
Dickins, J. M. 1956. Permian pelecypods from the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. Bull. Aust. Bur. min. Res. 29, 1–42.Google Scholar
Diener, C. 1897. Himalayan fossils. The Cephalopoda of the Lower Triassic. Mem. geol. Surv. ind. Palaeont. Indica ser. 15, 2 (1), 1–191.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. & Runnegar, B. 1975. Atomodesma (Bivalvia), and Permian species of the United States. Jl Paleont. 49, 23–41.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. & Teichert, C. (Eds). 1970. Stratigraphic boundary problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan. Dept. Geol. Univ. Kansas, Spec. Pub. 4, 1–474.Google Scholar
Logan, A. & Hills, L. V. (Eds). 1973. The Permian and Triassic Systems and their mutual boundary. Mem. Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol. 2, 1–766.Google Scholar
Mikan, F. A. & Sweet, W. C. 1974. Graphic correlation of key Permo-Triassic sections in Kashmir, Pakistan and Iran. Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Programs, 6, 531.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (Ed). 1969. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology; part N, vol. 1, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geol. Soc. Amer. and Kansas Univ. Press, 1–489.Google Scholar
Ruzhencev, V. E. & Sarycheva, T. G. (Eds). 1965. Razvitie i smena morskikh organizmov na rubezhe Paleozoya i Mezozoya. (Evolution and change of marine organisms at the boundary between the Paleozoic and Mesozoic.) Akad. Nauk SSSR, Paleont. Inst., Trudy 108, 1–431.Google Scholar
Spinosa, C., Furnish, W. M. & Glenister, B. F. 1975. The Xenodiscidae, Permian ceratitoid ammonoids. Jl Paleont. 49, 239–283.Google Scholar
Teichert, C., Kummel, B. & Sweet, W. 1973. Permian—Triassic strata, Kuh-e-Ali Bashi, northwestern Iran. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. 145, 359–472.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1872. On the occurrence of Ammonites, associated with Ceratites, and Goniatites in the Carboniferous deposits of the Salt Range. Mem. Ind. geol. Surv. 9, 351–8.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1879. Salt-Range fossils, Productus Limestone fossils, Pisces—Cephalopoda. Mem. Ind. geol. Surv. Palaeont. Indica 13, 1 (1), 1–72.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1895. Salt Range fossils, fossils from the Ceratite formation. Pisces— Ammonoidea. Mem. Ind. geol. Surv. Palaeont. Indica. 13, 2, 1–323.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1964(a). A Permian ammonoid from New Zealand. Jl Paleont. 38, 149–50.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1964(b). Permian stratigraphy and faunas of New Zealand. Bull. N.Z. geol. Surv. 72, 1–101.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1967. Upper Permian (Tatarian) Brachiopods from New Zealand. N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys. 10, 74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1969. World correlation of New Zealand Permian stages. N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys. 12, 713–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1973. An Ophiceratid ammonoid from the New Zealand Permian and its implications for the Permian—Triassic boundary. Geol. Mag. 110, 305–29.Google Scholar
Welter, O. A. 1922. Die Ammoniten der unteren Trias von Timor. Paläontologie von Timor, Stuttgart. Lief. 11, 83–154.Google Scholar