Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:35:35.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proterozoic stratigraphy and tectonic framework of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Wang Hongzhen  and
Qiao Xiufu
Wang Hongzhen
Affiliation:
Beijing Graduate School, Wuhan College of Geology, Chengfu Road, Beijing, China.
Qiao Xiufu
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Baiwanzhuang Road, Beijing, China.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The time span of the Proterozoic is taken as from 2600 to 600 Ma with subdivision boundaries at 1850 and 1050 Ma respectively, as 2600 Ma seems more appropriate for the initial Proterozoic in China, Siberia and parts of Gondwanaland, and 600 Ma is an inferred age of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary based on recent study of the Yangtze Gorge section. The Proterozoic of China includes the Lower Proterozoic Wutaian and Hutuo-an, the Middle Proterozoic Changchengian and Jixianian and the Upper Proterozoic Qingbaikou-an and Sinian.

Based mainly on tectono-sedimentary types and associations, seven stratigraphic super-regions are recognized in the Proterozoic of China and stratigraphic successions of various representative regions are shown in two tables, one for the Sinian and another for the Pre-Sinian Proterozoic. Palaeogeographic outline of the main super-regions and chronometric limit of the principal stratigraphic units are briefly discussed. Three types of stable Sinian successions are distinguished, the Yangtze type, the Quruktagh type and the Jiaoliao type, which are correlated mainly on the basis of tillite horizons and of sabelliditids and the Ediacara type of fossils. Semi-stable and mobile types of Sinian deposits in Southeast China are also briefly mentioned.

The Proterozoic tectonic units of China and the nature of their boundaries are shown on a sketch map showing basement structures. Crustal sectors of continental nature are designated as continental tectonic domains, while broad and complicated crustal sectors of mainly transitional and partly oceanic nature may be called continental margin tectonic domains. The boundaries between these domains are usually the principal crustal consumption zones. On this basis, three continental domains, the North China, the South China and the Southern (Gondwana), and two continental margin domains, the Northern (Siberian–Mongolian) and the East China, are distinguished. Platforms, continental nuclei, massifs and uplifts are used to denote subdivisions within the tectonic domains. The development of aulacogens is an outstanding feature in the continental domains, especially in the Middle Proterozoic. Aulacogens may be classified into an intra-platform type and a platform margin type. Early Proterozoic aulacogens are usually brachy-axial and intermittent, and show conspicuous deformation at closure, much like a geosyncline. Thirteen aulacogens of different types are shown on the sketch map.

The boundary nature of continental domains is analysed in terms of island arcs and marginal seas, and also of emplacement of granite rocks in border parts. The North China Domain was basically consolidated at around 1850 Ma and has a passive northern margin stretching from Nei Mongol to Central Tianshan, but the southern margin was active and was twice subducted by the Qinling marine realm at 1700 and 1000 Ma approximately. The Yangtze Platform was not completely consolidated until 1050 Ma BP but has a core older than 1850 Ma. A broad continental margin terrain had developed in the Jiangnan region and farther to the southeast in the Middle and Late Proterozoic. At least two island arc belts with interarc basins, an inner Fanjingshan and an outer Sibao, may be discerned in the Middle Proterozoic, and a Late Proterozoic island arc zone over 1000 km in length was developed along the southern margin of the Jiangnan Uplift, represented by the Banxi Group and equivalent strata. This kind of broad complicated continental margin tract which has a long development history may be called the open type or the West Pacific type.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 121 , Issue 6 , November 1984 , pp. 599 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, Jinbiao, Zhang, Huimin & Ma, Guogan. 1981. On the Upper Precambrian (Sinian Superathem) of China. Precambrian Research 15, 207–28.Google Scholar
Cheng, Yuqi, Bai, Jin & Sun, Dazhong. 1982. The Lower and Middle Precambrian of China. In An Outline of the Stratigraphy of China (ed. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences), pp. 1–46. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ding, Qixiu & Chen, Yiyuan. 1981*. Discovery of soft metazoans from the Sinian System along eastern Yangtze Gorge, Hubei. Earth Science, Journal of Wuhan College of Geology 1981 (3), 53–7.Google Scholar
Guo, Lingzhi, Shi, Yangshen & Ma, Ruishi. 1980*. The geotectonic framework and crustal evolution of South China. In Scientific Papers on Geology for International Exchange, no. 1.Tectonic Geology and Geomechanics, pp. 115–26. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Picton, C. A., Smith, A. G. & Walters, R. 1982. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press. 131 pp.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. 1973. Evolution of an Early Proterozoic continental margin: the Coronation Geosyncline and associated aulacogens of the northwestern Canadian Shield. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper no. 70–40, pp. 200–12.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P., Dewey, J. F. & Burke, K. 1974. Aulacogens and their genetic relation to geosynclines with a Proterozoic example from Great Slave Lake, Canada. In Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation (ed. Dotts, R. H Jr., & Shaver, R. H), pp. 38–55. Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication no. 19, 380 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jiliang. 1982*. The spilite-keratophyre series in two Proterozoic aulacogens. Petrological Research 1, 121–31.Google Scholar
Liu, Hongyun, Dong, Yongsheng, Li, Jianlin & Yang, Yanjun. 1980*. Problems of classification and correlation of the Sinian System. Scientia Geologica Sinica 1980 (4), 307–21.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaoliang. 1981*. Metazoan fossils from Mashan Group near Jixi, Heilongjiang. Bulletin of the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 3 (1), 79–94.Google Scholar
Milankowsky, E. E. 1978. Some problems of rifting development in the Earth's history. In Tectonics and Geophysics of Continental Rifts (ed. Ramberg, I. B & Neumann, E. R), pp. 385–99. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, J. D. A. 1976. Palaeomagnetic evidence for a Proterozoic supercontinent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 280, 469–90.Google Scholar
Qiao, Xiufu & Geng, Shufang. 1981*. On Late Precambrian plate tectonics of South China. In Contributions to the Tectonics of China and Adjacent Regions (ed. Huang, Jiqing & Li, Chunyu), pp. 91–99. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Qiao, Xiufu & Ma, Lifang. 1982*. The crustal movement of the North China Platform in the Middle Proterozoic, Late Proterozoic and Neoproterozoic. Bulletin of the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 4, 1–14.Google Scholar
Qiao, Xiufu, Zhang, Dequan, Wang, Xuiying & An, Yuqing. 1983*. Rb–Sr age determination of the volcanic rocks of Xiaoliangling Formation in central Shaanxi. Bulletin of the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences 5, 111–14.Google Scholar
Ren, Jishun, Jiang, Chunfa, Zhang, Zhengkun & Qin, Deyu. 1980*. The tectonic evolution of China. In Contributions to the Tectonics of China and Adjacent Regions (ed. Huang, Jiqing & Li, Chunyu), pp. 138–47. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Salop, L. I. & Sheinmann, Y. M. 1969. Tectonic history and structure of platforms and shields. Tectonophysics 7, 565–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Shu, Chen, Zhiming & Wang, Qingchen. 1982*. Evolution of Henan–Shaanxi sedimentary basin of Middle and Late Proterozoic age. Part 2. Scientia Geologica Sinica 1982, 1–12.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen. 1978**. On the subdivision of stratigraphic provinces of China. Acta Stratigraphica Sinica 2 (2), 81–104.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen. 1981*. Geotectonic units of China from the viewpoint of mobilism. Earth Science, Journal of Wuhan College of Geology 1981 (1), 42–66.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen. 1982*. The main stages of crustal development of China. Earth Science, Journal of Wuhan College of Geology 1982 (3), 155–77.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen, Xu, Chengyan & Zhou, Chengguo. 1982*. Tectonic development of the continental margins on both sides of the palaeo-Qinling marine realm. Acta Geologica Sinica 56 (3), 280–91.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen, Wang, Zijiang & Zhu, Hong. 1980*. Middle Proterozoic tectono-palaeogeography of China. In Scientific Papers on Geology for International Exchange no. 1. Tectonic Geology and Geomechanics, pp. 61–8. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongzhen, Wang, Zijiang, Zhu, Hong, Chen, Yiyuan & Quan, Qiuqi. 1980*. Late Proterozoic tectono-palaeogeography of China. Scientia Geologica Sinica 1980 (2), 103–10.Google Scholar
Wang, Zuoxin & Liu, Fengren. 1982*. Discovery of an angular unconformity between the Taowan Group and underlying strata on the northern slope of East Qinling and its implication. Geological Review, Beijing 28 (3), 247–9.Google Scholar
Xing, Yusheng. 1976. The Sinian System of China. Beijing: Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. 16 pp.Google Scholar