Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:15:05.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospectatrix genatenta (Stubblefield) and the trilobite superfamily Cyclopygacea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. A. Fortey
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England

Summary

Cyclopyge genatenta Stubblefield, 1927, is interpreted from new material, and established as the type species of a new cyclopygid genus, Prospectatrix. The morphology of Prospectatrix shows that the cyclopygids and nileids are closely related, and together with the Taihungshaniidae, these families are included in an expanded concept of the Cyclopygacea. The subfamily Ellipsotaphrinae Kobayashi and Hamada, 1971 is excluded from the Cyclopygidae. Pelagic habits arose on at least five separate evolutionary lines among Ordovician trilobites: Prospectatrix lies near the origin of one of these. Cremastoglottos Whittard was derived from a robergioid ancestor by forward migration of the eyes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergström, J. 1973. Organisation, life and systematics of trilobites. Fossils Strata 2, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, B. N. 1953. Trilobites from the Lower Champlainian formations of the Appalachian Valley. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 55, 146, pls 1–19.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W., Fortey, R. A. & Owens, R. M. 1978. Newly discovered Tremadoc rocks in the Carmarthen district, South Wales, Geol. Mag. 115, 195–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtessole, R. & Pillet, J. 1975. Contribution à l'étude des faunas trilobitiques de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montaigne Noire. Les Eulominae et les Nileidae. Ann. Soc. Géol. Nord 95, 251–72.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1973. The Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and faunas of the Taurus mountains near Beysehir, Turkey. III. The trilobites of the Sobova Formation (Lower Ordovician). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 24, 282348, 12 pls.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1968. Fossils from the Smith Basin Limestone of the Fort Ann region, New York. Mem. Inst. Min. Techol. New Mex. 22, 2327.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1974. A new pelagic trilobite from the Ordovician of Spitsbergen, Ireland and Utah. Palaentology 17, 111124, pls 13, 14.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1975. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. II. Asaphidae, Nileidae, Raphiophoridae and Telephinidae of the Valhallfonna Formation. Skr. norsk Polarinst. 162, 1207.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1980(a). The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. III. Remaining trilobites of the Valhallfonna Formation. Skr. norsk Polarinst. 172, 1163, 25 pls.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1980(b). Basilicus tyrannus (Murchison) and the glabellar structure of asaphid trilobites. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 34, 255–64.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Owens, R. M. 1978. Early Ordovician (Arenig) stratigraphy and faunas of the Carmarthen district, South Wales. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (geol.) 30, 225–94.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Owens, R. M. 1982. Trilobita. In Tremadoc Faunas from South Wales (Owens, R. M., Fortey, R. A., Cope, J. C. W., Rushton, A. W. A. & Bassett, M. G.). Geol. Mag. 119.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. & Hamada, T. 1971. Contributions to the geology and palaeontology of southeast Asia. 78. A Cyclopygid-bearing Ordovician faunule discovered in Malaya with a note on the Cyclopygidae. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia 8, 118 (for 1970).Google Scholar
Lu, Yen-Hao 1975. Ordovician trilobite faunas of central and southwestern China. Palaeont. Sin. N.S. B 11, 1463, 50 pls.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1960. The trilobite family Cyclopygidae Raymond in the Ordovician of Bohemia. Rozpr. ústred. Ust. geol. 28, 184, pls 1–6.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1966. Nadćeléd Bohemillacea Barrande, 1872 (Trilobite) v Ceském Ordoviku Čas. národ. Mus. 135, 145–53.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1977. Celed Ellipsotaphridae Kobayashi et Hamada 1970 (Trilobite). Čas. národ. Mus. 143, 6971 (for 1974).Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed.) 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O, Arthropoda l, Lawrence, U.S.A.: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of North-Western Queensland. Bull. Bur. miner. Resour. Aust. 74,Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. & Hughes, C. P. 1981. The Ordovician trilobite fauna of the Great Paxton Borehole, Cambridgeshire. Geol. Mag. 118, 623646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1979. Two rare trilobites from the Tremadoc Leimitz Shales, Germany. Alcheringa 3, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1975. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from the Burke River Structural Belt, western Queensland, Australia. Bull. Bur. miner. Resour. Aust. 153, 1251, 58 pls.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1976. New finds of trilobites from the Dobrotivá Formation (Llandeilan) in the Barrandian. Vest. ústred, Ust. geol. 51, 231–7.Google Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J. & Bulman, O. M. B. 1927. The Shineton Shales of the Wrekin District. Q. Jl. geol. Soc. Lond. 83, 96146, pls 3, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjernvik, T. 1956. On the Early Ordovician of Sweden; stratigraphy and fauna. Bull. geol. Instn Univ. Uppsala 36, 107284, 11 pls.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1939. On Swedish Cambrian Asaphidae. Sver. geol. Unders. C 421.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1952. Cyclopygid trilobites from Girvan and a note on Bohemilla. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 1, 305–24.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1961. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, West Shropshire. V. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.], 163196, pls 22–25.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1965. Trilobites of the Ordovician Table Head Formation, western Newfoundland. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 132, 275442, 68 pls.Google Scholar