Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:55:59.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Orlock Bridge Fault in the Southern Uplands of southwestern Scotland: a terrane boundary?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. P. Barnes ,
E. R. Phillips  and
M. P. Boland
R. P. Barnes
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains RoadEdinburgh, EH9 3LA, UK
E. R. Phillips
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains RoadEdinburgh, EH9 3LA, UK
M. P. Boland
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Orlock Bridge Fault separates the Ordovician and Silurian turbidite sequences within the Southern Uplands thrust belt. A large biostratigraphical break and the 1 km wide sinistral Slieve Glah Shear Zone associated with the fault in northern Ireland led to previous interpretation as a major regional structure, possibly a terrane boundary. In Scotland, however, the stratigraphical break is much less and an association with inliers of the Moffat Shale Group suggests that the fault is essentially similar to the other tract-bounding faults which originated as syn-D1 thrusts within the imbricate stack. Localized sinistral deformation apparent along the trace of the Orlock Bridge Fault in southwestern Scotland, associated with post-1 reactivation, is comparable to that seen at Slieve Glah. Further east, a broad zone (up to 8 km) of sinistral ductile deformation, the Moniaive Shear Zone, is recognized adjacent to the Orlock Bridge Fault over a strike length of about 100 km. However, this zone differs from the Slieve Glah Shear Zone in its width and its location relative to the fault, suggesting that it is not simply related to the fault but represents a more regional deformation. Sinistral reactivation of the Orlock Bridge Fault was possibly initiated in the Wenlock during the peak of sinistral shear at the thrust front, although it may have developed over a long time contemporaneously with, but locally post-dating, the Moniaive Shear Zone. The latter deforms porphyroblasts with the thermal aureole of the c. 392 Ma Cairnsmore of Fleet granite pluton, which was emplaced into and largely post-dates the shear zone, but is deformed by the Orlock Bridge Fault. Major dip-slip reactivation of the fault post-dates the Moniaive Shear Zone and regional metamorphism and probably occurred in the Carboniferous or Permian. There is some evidence for a deep crustal feature coincident with the Orlock Bridge Fault, possibly the boundary between different crustal blocks in the collage of terrane fragments accreted during the final closure of Iapetus, which may explain the unusual extent of the reactivation of the Orlock Bridge Fault within the allochthonous Southern Uplands thrust stack. However, the situation of the fault within the Southern Uplands terrane and, in Scotland, the biostratigraphical evidence of no major stratigraphical break across the fault and the lack of any clear relationship between the Orlock Bridge Fault and the Moniaive Shear Zone indicate that the fault should not be regarded as a terrane boundary.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , September 1995 , pp. 523 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T. B., 1987. The onset and timing of Caledonian sinistral shear in County Down. Journal of the Geological Society, London 144, 817–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. B., & Oliver, G. J. H., 1986. The Orlock Bridge Fault: a major Late Caledonian sinistral fault in the Southern Uplands terrane, British Isles. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 77, 203–22.Google Scholar
Barnes, R. P., Lintern, B. C., & Stone, P., 1989. Short Paper: Timing and regional implications of deformations in the Southern Uplands of Scotland. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146, 905–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, D., 1992 a. A magnetotelluric survey across the Thornhill Basin, Southern Uplands. British Geological Survey, Technical Report WN/92/11.Google Scholar
Beamish, D., 1992 b. Two-dimensional inversion of the Thornhill Basin using MT survey data. British Geological Survey, Technical Report WN/92/14.Google Scholar
Beamish, D., 1995. Deep resistivity imaging across the Northern and Central belts of the Southern Uplands. Geological Magazine 132, 000–000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Geological Survey. 1992 a. 1:50 000 sheet 4W, Wigtown.Google Scholar
British Geological Survey. 1992 b. 1:50 000 sheet 4E, Kirkcowan.Google Scholar
Floyd, J. D., & Rushton, A. W. A., 1993. Ashgill greywackes in the Southern Uplands of Scotland: an extension of the Ordovician succession in the Northern Belt. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 84, 79–85.Google Scholar
Floyd, J. D., Stone, P., Barnes, R. P., & Lintern, B. C., 1987. Constraints on the significance of the Orlock Bridge Fault within the Scottish Southern Uplands. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 78, 219–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, A. N., Stephens, W. E., & Harmon, R. S., 1980. Rb-Sr and O-isotopic relationships in 3 zoned Caledonian granitic plutons, Southern Uplands, Scotland: evidence for varied sources and hybridisation of magmas. Journal of the Geological Society, London 137, 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, D. W. H., & McErlean, M., 1991. Silurian and early Devonian sinistral deformation of the Ratagain granite, Scotland: constraints on the age of Caledonian movements on the Great Glen Fault system. Journal of the Geological Society, London 148, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbell, G. S. K., & Stone, P., 1995. Crustal magnetization variations across the Iapetus suture Zone. Geological Magazine 132, 000–000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, J. K., McKerrow, W. S., & Eales, M. H., 1979. The Southern Uplands of Scotland; a Lower Palaeozoic accretionary prism. Journal of the Geological Society, London 136, 755–70.Google Scholar
Lintern, B. C., Barnes, R. P., & Stone, P., 1992. Discussion on the Silurian and Early Devonian sinistral deformation of the Ratagain Granite, Scotland: constraints on the age of Caledonian movements on the Great Glen system by D. W. H. Hutton and M. McErlean (1991) Journal of the Geological Society, London 149, 858.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., & Horne, J., 1899. The Silurian Rocks of Britain, Vol. 1. Scotland. Memoir of the Geological Survey no. 749.Google Scholar
Phillips, E., 1994. Microstructural study of the Moniaive Shear Zone, Southern Uplands, Scotland. British Geological Survey Technical Report WG/94/2, 136.Google Scholar
Phillips, E. R., Barnes, R. P., Boland, M. P., Fortey, N. J., & McMillan, A. A., in press. The Moniaive Shear Zone: a major zone of sinistral strike-slip deformation in the Southern Uplands of Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. G., 1967. Folding and fracturing of rocks. McGraw and Hill.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A., & Stone, P., 1991. Terrigenous input to the Moffat Shale sequence, Southern Uplands. Scottish Journal of Geology 27, 167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, N. J., Strachan, R. E., Holdsworth, R. A., Gayer, R. A., & Greiling, R. O., 1992. Sinistral transpression and the Silurian closure of Iapetus. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149, 871–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P., Floyd, J. D., Barnes, R. P., & Lintern, B. C., 1987. A sequential back-arc and foreland basin thrust duplex model for the Southern Uplands of Scotland. Journal of the Geological Society, London 144, 753–64.Google Scholar
Stone, P., Cook, J. M., McDermott, C., Robinson, J. J., & Simpson, P. R., in press. Lithostratigraphic and structural controls of As and Au in the SW Southern Uplands, Scotland. Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar