Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:01:29.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on some Pleistocene Sections at Barrington, Cambridgeshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

B. W. Sparks
B. W. Sparks
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Valley fill exposed in chalk pits at Barrington consists of two beds, which differ markedly in lithology and in the nature of the molluscan fauna contained in them. The lower bed is thought to predate the Boulder Clay, which caps the high ground, and the upper bed is considered to have been derived from the Boulder Clay. The lower bed, a chalk solifluxion, apparently spread into the Cam valley and covered the famous Hippopotamus bed. Both the Hippopotamus bed and the present depth of the Cam valley, therefore, probably predate the Boulder Clay.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , June 1952 , pp. 163 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braun, A. L., 1847. Letter in Neues Jahrb. f. Min., 49–53 (description on p. 51).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrmann, P., 1933. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. II Bd., I Lief. Mollusken (Weichtiere). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. E., 1926. British Snails, Oxford.Google Scholar
Geyer, D., 1927. Unsere Land-und Süsswasser Mollusken. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MrsHughes, Mckenny, 1888. On the Mollusca of the Pleistocene Gravels in the Neighbourhood of Cambridge. Geol. Mag., xxv, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. McKenny, 1911. Excursion to Cambridge and Barrington. Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxii, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. 1916. The Gravels of East Anglia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S., 1923. The Holocene non-Marine Mollusca of England. Proc. Malac. Soc., xv, 241–259.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S. 1924. The Pleistocene non-Marine Mollusca of England. Proc. Malac. Soc., xvi, 84–97.Google Scholar
Kennard, A. S. and Woodward, B. B., 1922. The post-Pliocene non-Marine Mollusca of the East of England. Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxxiii, 104–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. V., 1949. The Pegsdon Dry Valleys. Compass (Camb. Univ. Geogr. Soc.), 1, 53–70.Google Scholar
Lindholm, W. A., 1925. Studien an paläarktischen Vertigo-Arten. Arch. für Molluskenkunde, lxii, 241–251.Google Scholar
Marr, J. F., 1919. The Pleistocene Deposits around Cambridge. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxvii, 204–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., 1918–1920. Manual of Conchology (second series), 25, Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Quick, H. E., 1933. The Anatomy of British Succineae. Proc. Malac. Soc., xx, 295–318.Google Scholar
Steusloff, U., 1938. Neue Beiträge zur Molluskenfauna. Arch. für Molluskenkunde, lxx, 161–193.Google Scholar
Steusloff, U. 1942. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung und Lebenansprüche der Vertigo genesii-parcedentata. Arch. für Molluskenkunde, lxxiv, 192–212.Google Scholar
Watson, Hugh, 1943. Notes on a List of the British non-Marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., xxi, 13–22, 25–47, 53–72.Google Scholar