Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:13:55.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Wiwaxia material from the Tsinghsutung Formation (Cambrian Series 2) of Eastern Guizhou, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

HAI-JING SUN ,
YUAN-LONG ZHAO ,
JIN PENG  and
YU-NING YANG
HAI-JING SUN
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, People's Republic of China
YUAN-LONG ZHAO
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, People's Republic of China
JIN PENG*
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, People's Republic of China
YU-NING YANG
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, People's Republic of China
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wiwaxia is an extinct early metazoan with uncertain affinities, which is well represented in strata of Cambrian Series 2–3 age. Well-preserved representatives of Wiwaxia are known from the Burgess Shale Biota and the Kaili Biota. Here, new material of Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew, 1899) is reported from the upper part of the Tsinghsutung Formation (Cambrian Series 2) near Balang Village, Guizhou Province, China. These specimens have a close evolutionary relationship to Wiwaxia taijiangensis Zhao, Qian & Lee, 1994 from the overlying Kaili Formation. New Wiwaxia material from the Tsinghsutung Formation and observations of specimens with articulated individuals from the Kaili Formation suggest that Wiwaxia taijiangensis should be a junior synonym of W. corrugata. A new study indicates that W. corrugata has a wide geographic distribution, a short geological history and evolutionary uniqueness and provides new data on taphonomy of this genus.

Keywords

WiwaxiaTsinghsutung FormationCambrian Series 2Guizhou
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 339 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bengtson, S. & Conway Morris, S. 1984. A comparative study of Lower Cambrian Halkieria and Middle Cambrian Wiwaxia . Lethaia 17, 307–29.Google Scholar
Brett, C. B. & Baird, G. C. 1986. Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil presentation. Palaios 1, 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., Erwin, D. H. & Collier, F. J. 1994. The Fossils of the Burgess Shale. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London, 237 pp.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 1990. A reassessment of the enigmatic Burgess Shale fossil Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) and its relationship to the Polychaete Canadia spinosa Walcott. Paleobiology 16 (3), 287–303.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 1994. Burgess Shale-type fossils from a Lower Cambrian shallow-shelf sequence in Northwestern Canada. Nature 369, 477–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. 2003. Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, 166–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, N. J. 2006. Hooking some stem-group “worms”: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale. BioEssays 28, 1161–6.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J. & Harvey, T. H. P. 2012. Small carbonaceous fossils (SCFs): a new measure of early Paleozoic paleobiology. Geology 40 (1), 71–4.Google Scholar
Caron, J. B., Scheltema, A., Schander, C. & Rudkin, D. 2006. A soft-bodied mollusc with radula from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Nature 442, 159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway Morris, S. 1982. Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew), a problematical Middle Cambrian animal from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Third North America Paleontology Convention, Proceedings 1, 93–8.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1985. The Middle Cambrian metazoan Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) from the Burgess Shale and Ogygopsis Shale, British Columbia, Canada. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, B 307, 507–86.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Caron, J. B. 2007. Halwaxiids and the Early Evolution of the Lophotrochozoans. Science 315, 1255–8.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Peel, J. S. 1995. Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their Role in Early Protostome Evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 347, 305–58.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Robison, R. A. 1988. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. Paleontological Contributions 122, 1–48.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. 2008. Stratigraphy and facies of Cambrian to Lower Ordovician strata in Saskatchewan. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 56 (2), 93–117.Google Scholar
Eibye-Jacobsen, D. 2004. A reevaluation of Wiwaxia and the polychaetes of the Burgess Shale. Lethaia 37, 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatka, O., Kraft, P. & Szabad, M. 2011. Shallow-water occurrence of Wiwaxia in the middle Cambrian of the Barrandian area, Czech Republic. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (4), 871–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Hammarlund, E. U., Hou, X.-G., Qi, C.-S., Gabbott, S. E., Zhao, Y.-L., Peng, J. & Canfield, D. E. 2012. Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation. PNAS 109 (14), 5180–4.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Mering, J. A., Zhao, Y.-L. & Peng, J. 2011. Stratigraphic and microfacies analysis of the Kaili Formation, a candidate GSSP for the Cambrian Series 2–Series 3 boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 311, 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, T. H. P., Ortega-Hernández, J., Lin, R.-P., Zhao, Y.-L. & Butterfield, N. J. 2012. Burgess Shale-type microfossils from the middle Cambrian Kaili Formation, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (2), 423–36.Google Scholar
Ivantsov, A. Y., Zhuravlev, A. Y. & Leguta, A. V. 2005. Palaeoecology of the Early Cambrian Sinsk biota from the Siberian Platform. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B.-J. & Zeng, Y.-F. 1985. Lithofacies Palaeogeographic Foundation and Working Methods. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899. Studies of Cambrian faunas. 3. Upper Cambrian fauna on Mount Stephen, British Columbia. The trilobites and worms. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada 5, 39–66.Google Scholar
O'Brien, N. R., Nakazawa, K. & Tokuhashi, S. 1980. Use of clay fabric to distinguish turbiditic and hemipelagic siltstones and silts. Sedimentology 27, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, S. D. 2004. Halkieriids in Middle Cambrian phosphatic limestones from Australia. Journal of Paleontology 78 (3), 574–90.Google Scholar
Scheltema, A. H., Kerth, K. & Kuzirian, A. M. 2003. Original molluscan radula: comparisons among Aplacophora, Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, and the Cambrian fossil Wiwaxia corrugata . Journal of Morphology 257, 219–45.Google Scholar
Smith, M. R. 2012. Mouthparts of the Burgess Shale fossils Odontogriphus and Wiwaxia: implications for the ancestral molluscan radula. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 279, 4287–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, R. J. & Demicco, R. V. 2002. Facies and sequence stratigraphy of two Cambrian grand cycles: implications for Cambrian sea level and origin of grand cycles. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 50 (4), 478–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Roy, P., Orr, P. J., Botting, J. P., Muir, L. A., Vinther, J., Lefebvre, B., Hariri, K. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2010. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465, 215–18.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Mount Stephen rocks and fossils. Canadian Alpine Journal 1, 232–48.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Cambrian geology and paleontology: Middle Cambrian annelids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 57 (5), 110–44.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1985. The Burgess Shale. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 149 pp.Google Scholar
Yang, X.-L., Zhao, Y.-L., Peng, J., Yang, Y.-N. & Yang, K.-D. 2010. Discovery of Oryctocephalid trilobites from the Tsinghsutung Formation (Duyunian Stage, Qiandongian Series, Cambrian), Jianhe County, Guizhou Province. Geological Journal of China Universities 16 (3), 309–16 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yin, G.-Z. 1987. Cambrian. In Regional Geology of Guizhou Province (ed. Bureau of Guizhou Geology and Mineral Resources), pp. 49–96. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Yin, Z.-X., Chen, Y.-R. & Qin, N. 1945. Cambrian strata of Meitan County, Guizhou, China. Geology Review 10 (Z3), 205–20 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-T., Lu, Y.-H., Zhu, Z.-L., Qian, Y.-Y., Lin, H.-L., Zhou, Z.-Y., Zhang, S.-G. & Yuan, J.-L. 1980. Cambrian Trilobite Faunas of Southeastern China. Science Press, Beijing, 497 pp (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhang, X.-C., Yao, J.-X. & Xiao, S.-H. 2009. SEM observation of the polychaete Lepidonotus helotypus Grube, 1877 and its comparison with the Cambrian animal fossil Wiwaxia . Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 48 (1), 45–55 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhang, Z.-H., Shen, J.-W., Gong, X.-Y., Zhao, Y.-L., Mao, J.-R. & Yan, C.-H. 1996. A preliminary discussion on preservation condition of Kaili Fauna, Middle Cambrian, Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 35 (5), 607–20 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Qian, Y. & Lee, X.-S. 1994. Wiwaxia from Early–Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation in Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 33 (3), 359–67 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yu, Y.-Y., Yuan, J.-L., Yang, X.-L. & Guo, Q.-J. 2001. Cambrian stratigraphy at Huanglian, Guizhou Province, China: reference section for bases of the Nangaoan and Duyunian Stages. Palaeoworld 13, 172–81.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., Zhu, M.-Y., Guo, Q.-J., Zhou, Z., Yang, R.-D. & Iten, H. V. 1999. The Early Cambrian Taijiang Biota of Taijiang, Guizhou, PRC. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38 (suppl), 108–15 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Zhu, M.-Y. & Babcock, L. E. 2011. The Kaili Biota: Marine Organisms from 5.08 Million Years Ago. Guizhou Science and Technology Press, Guiyang, 249 pp. (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Zhu, M.-Y., Babcock, L. E., Yuan, J.-L., Parsley, R. L., Peng, J., Yang, X.-L. & Wang, Y. 2005. Kaili Biota: a taphonomic window on diversification of metazoans from the basal Middle Cambrian: Guizhou, China. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 79 (6), 751–65.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., Peng, S.-C., Babcock, L. E., Peng, J., Lin, J.-P. & Guo, Q.-J. 2007. New data on the Wuliu-Zengjiayan section (Balang, South China), GSSP candidate for the base of Cambrian Series 3. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 33, 57–65.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-Y., Yuan, J.-L., Zhang, Z.-H., Wu, X.-R. & Yin, G.-Z. 1980. The classification and correlation of Cambrian strata in Guizhou, China. Journal of Stratigraphy 4 (4), 273–81 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhu, M.-Y., Erdtmann, B. D. & Zhao, Y.-L. 1999. Taphonomy and paleoecology of the Early Middle Cambrian Kaili Lagerstätte in Guizhou, China. Acta Geologica Sinica 38 (suppl), 28–57 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar