Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:12:39.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new interpretation of Ordovician stratigraphy in the Bahçe area, northern Amanos Mountains, south central Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. T. Dean  and
O. Monod
W. T. Dean
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, P.O. Box 78, Cardiff, CF1 1XL, U.K.
O. Monod
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Géologie Historique, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lower Ordovician rocks in the Bahçe–Fevzipaşa district of the northern Amanos Mountains, previously divided into three separate formations, are referred to the Seydisehir Formation. Shaly strata that crop out southeast of Bahçe and have been termed Kizlaç Formation, Ayran Series or Bahçe Formation, described variously as being of Ordovician or Silurian age, are referred to the lower shale member of the Bedinan Formation; their sparse fauna includes the trilobites Colpocoryphe, Kloucekia and Nobiliasasphus and is of Caradoc age. A single locality containing Kloucekia phillipsii (Barrande, 1846) is shown to be that recorded by Frech in 1916 and subsequently lost sight of.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 122 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrande, J. 1846. Notice préliminaire sur le Systême silurien et les Trilobites de Bohême. Leipsic. vi+97 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1852. Systême silurien du centre de la Bohême. lére partie. Recherches paléontologiques. Prague and Paris, xxx+935pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. B. N. & Boucot, A. J. 1972. Correlation of the Southeast Asian and Near Eastern Silurian rocks. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 137, 65 pp.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Berlin. xii+147 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1967. The correlation and trilobite fauna of the Bedinan Formation (Ordovician) in southeastern Turkey. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 15, 81–123.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1975. Cambrian and Ordovician correlation and trilobite distribution in Turkey. Fossils and Strata 5, 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1980. The Ordovician System in the Near and Middle East. International Union of Geological Sciences, Publication no. 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1983. Additional faunal data for the Bedinan Formation (Ordovician) in southeastern Turkey. Special Papers in Palaeontology 30, 89–105.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. & Krummenacher, R. 1961. Cambrian trilobites from the Amanos Mountains, Turkey. Palaeontology 4, 71–81.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. & Monod, O. 1970. The Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and faunas of the Taurus Mountains near Beysehir, Turkey, 1. Stratigraphy. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 19, 411–26.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T., Monod, O. & Perinçek, D. 1981. Correlation of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in southeastern Turkey. Petroleum Activities at the 100th Year (100 Yilda Petrol Faaliyeti). Türkiye Cumhuriyet Petrol Isleri Genet Müdürlügˇü Dergisi 25, 269–91 (in English), 292–300 (in Turkish).Google Scholar
Delo, D. M. 1935. A revision of the phacopid trilobites. Journal of Palaeontology 9, 402–20.Google Scholar
Dubertret, L. 1936. Stratigraphie des régions recouvertes par les roches vertes du Nord-Ouest de la Syrie. Compte rendu hébdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 203, 1173–5.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. M. 1840. Histoire naturelle des Crustaceś, comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux. Volume 3, 638 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Flügel, H. W. 1964. Die Entwicklung des vorderasienatischen Paläozoikums. Geotecktonischen Forschungen 18, 1–68.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1916. Geologie Kleinasiens im Bereich der Bagdadbahn. Ergebnisse eigener Reisen und pälaontologischer Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft A 68, 1–325.Google Scholar
Haude, H. 1972. Stratigraphie und Tektonik des südlichen Sultan Da (SW Anatoleien). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 123, 411–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havíček, V. & Vaněk, J. 1966. The biostratigraphy of the Ordovician of Bohemia. Sborník Geologickýck Věd Praha P 8, 7–69.Google Scholar
Henry, J.-L. 1980. Trilobites ordoviciens du Massif Armoricain. Mémoires de la Société géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne 22, 1–250.Google Scholar
Hupé;, P. 1955. Classification des trilobites. Annales de Paléontologie 41, 91–325.Google Scholar
Ishmawi, R. 1972. Geologie des nördlichen Mittelteils des Amanos-gebirges zwischen Islahiye und Bahçe (S-Türkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 34–63.Google Scholar
Janetzko, P. 1972. Geologische Untersuchungen an der Ostflanke des südlichen Amanos-Gebirges zwischen Islahiye und Hassa (Sudtürkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 3–33.Google Scholar
Janvier, P., Lethiers, F., Monod, O. & Balkaş, Ö. 1984. Discovery of a vertebrate fauna at the Devonian–Carboniferous boundary in SE Turkey (Hakkâri Province). Journal of Petroleum Geology 7, 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahner, L. 1972. Geologische Untersuchungen an der Ostflanke des mittleren Amanos (SE-Türkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 64–96.Google Scholar
Monod, O. 1967. Présence d'une faune ordovicienne dans les Schistes de Seydişehir a ĺa base des calcaires du Taurus occidental. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey, Ankara 69, 79–89.Google Scholar
Özgül, N. & Gedik, I. 1973. Orta Toroslar'da Alt Paleozoyik yasta Çaltepe Kireçtaşi ve Seydişehir Formasyonu'nun stratigrafisi ve konodont faunasi hakkinda yeni bilgiler. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 16, 35–52.Google Scholar
Özgül, N., Metin, S. & Dean, W. T. 1973. Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and faunas of the eastern Taurus Mountains in the Tufanbeyli region, southern Turkey. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey 79, 9–16.Google Scholar
Perner, J. 1918. Die Trilobiten der Zone D-dIγ von Prag und Umgebung. Palaeontographica Bohemiae 9, 1–55.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. & Vaněk, J. 1965. Neue Trilobiten des böhmischen Ordoviziums. Věstnik Ústředniho Ústavu Geologického 40, 277–82.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. & Vaněk, J. 1968. Einige Trilobiten aus dem böhmischen Ordovizium. Věstnik Üstředního Üstavu Geologického 43, 191–7.Google Scholar
Rouault, M. 1849. Mémoire: 1° sur la composition du test des Trilobites; 2° sur les changements de forme dus à des causes accidentelles, ce qui a pu permettre de confondre des espèces différentes. Bulletin de la Société géologique de la France (2) 6, 67–89.Google Scholar
Schwan, W. 1971. Geology and tectonics of the central Amanos Mountains. In Geology and History of Turkey (ed. Campbell, A. S.), pp. 283–303. Tripoli.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1963. Kaledonischer Unterbau der Irakiden. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Monatshefte 10, 527–42.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1956. Trilobiti drabovských a letenských vrstev českého ordoviku. Sbornik Ustředního Ustavu Geologického, Paleontologie 22, 477–533.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W. 1890. A bibliography of Palaeozoic Crustacea from 1698 to 1889, including a list of North American species and a systematic arrangement of genera. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 63, 1–177.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1962. A monograph of the Ordovician trilobites of the Bala area, Merioneth, I. Palaeontographical Society (Monographs), 1–32.Google Scholar
Yalçin, N. 1980. Amanoslarin litolojik karakterleri ve Güneydogu Anadolu'nun tektonik evrimindeki anlami. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 23, 21–30.Google Scholar