Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T15:58:32.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Crinoids from Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe, with Lists of Carboniferous Limestone Crinoid Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

James Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One purpose of this paper is to place on record a new crinoid genus from Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe. The name Edapocrinus is proposed for its reception. Another is to note the discovery of two nearly complete crinoids at the same locality. This type of preservation is very rare at Coplow since the great majority of specimens found there consist of calices only and, except Actinocrinus and allied genera which have the lower brachials incorporated in the cup, it is only on a rare occasion that one finds a cup with any portion of the arms in position. In a paper to this Magazine, (1928, p. 246), I noted the discovery of the rare Flexible species, Euryocrinus rofei Bather and Gregory, which had part of the arms preserved, and remarked then on the scarcity of complete specimens of any species. Besides Coplow, this seems to apply to all the knolls in the Clitheroe region. Phillips, in his Geology of Yorkshire (1836), describes a considerable number of species from “Bolland”, most of which appear to have been collected by Gilbertson of Preston, and possibly some of the specimens were found at Coplow. All are cups only, with the exception of Poteriocrinus, now Taxocrinus nobilis, which is a complete crown. On different occasions during the last eight years, when I have made an annual visit to Coplow, I have found odd portions of arms, greatly displaced and not attached to any cup, usually in such a jumbled state that they were indeterminable.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 5 , May 1935 , pp. 193 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

VI. List of Literature

1843–8. Austin, T., and T. Monograph on Recent and Fossil Crinoidea, London and Bristol.Google Scholar
1843. Austin, T., “Description of Several New Genera and Species of Crinoidea,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., xi, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1875. Bailey, W. H., Figures of Characteristic British Fossils, London.Google Scholar
1892. Bather, F. A., “British Fossil Crinoids,” (Cyathocrinus), Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 6, x, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1893. Bather, F. A., “Crinodea of Gotland,” Kongl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., 25, No. 2.Google Scholar
1900. Bather, F. A., In Lankester’s Zoology, vol. iii, Echinoderma.Google Scholar
1912. Bather, F. A., “Notes on Hydreionocrinus ,” Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc., x, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1914. Bather, F. A., “British Fossil Crinoids,” (Sycocrinus), Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 8, xiii, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1916–17. Bather, F. A., “ Hydreionocrinus verrucosus n.sp. Carboniferous, Isle of Man,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xvi, 203.Google Scholar
1916–17. Bather, F. A., “Some British Specimens of Ulocrinus,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xvi, 207.Google Scholar
1826. Cumberland, G., Reliquiae Conservatae, etc., Bristol.Google Scholar
1858. de Koninck, L. G., “On Two New Genera of British Palaeozoic Crinoids,” Geologist, No. 4, 04, and No. 5, May.Google Scholar
1854. de Koninck, L. G., and Hon, H. Le. “Recherches sur les Crinoides du Terrain Carbonifère de la Belgique,” Mem. Acad. Soy. Belg., xxii, 1–208, with supplementary paper on Woodocrinus.Google Scholar
1857. de Koninck, L. G., and Wood, E.. “On the genus Woodocrinus,” Brit. Assoc. Report, 76–8.Google Scholar
1921. Dixon, E. E. L., “The Country around Pembroke and Tenby,” Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
1888. Etheridge, R., Fossils of the British Islands, vol. i, Palaeozoic, Oxford.Google Scholar
1826–33. Goldfuss, A., Petrefacta Germania, Dusseldorf.Google Scholar
1925. Hudson, R. G. S., “Faunal Horizons in the Lower Carboniferous of North-West Yorkshire,” Geol. Mag., LXII, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1933. Hudson, R. G. S., “The Geology of the Yorkshire Dales,” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xliv, 227.Google Scholar
1933. Hudson, R. G. S., and Turner, J. Selwyn. “Correlation of Dinantian and Namurian in Western Europe,” Proc. Leeds Phil. and Lit. Soc., ii, pt. x, 467.Google Scholar
1930. Lewis, H. P., “The Avonian Succession in the South of the Isle of Man,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxvi, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1862. McCoy, F., A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland” London.Google Scholar
1854. McCoy, F., Contributions to British Palaeontology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
1855. McCoy, F., with Sedgwick, A.. British Palaeozoic Bocks and Fossils, Cambridge.Google Scholar
1928–9. MCGregor, M., “Scottish Carboniferous Stratigraphy,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xviii, 442.Google Scholar
1821. Miller, J., A Natural History of the Crinoidea, Bristol.Google Scholar
1843. Morris, J., A Catalogue of British Fossils, London.Google Scholar
1926. Parkinson, D., “The Faunal Succession in the Carboniferous Limestone and Bowland Shales at Clitheroe and Pendle Hill,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxii, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1820. Parkinson, J., Organic Remains of a Former World, London.Google Scholar
1836. Phillips, J., Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, pt. ii, London.Google Scholar
1843. Portlook, J. E., Geological Report of Londonderry and parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh, Dublin.Google Scholar
1865. Roberts, G. E., “Geological Notes on the Mountain Limestones of England,” Geol. Mag., II, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1865. Rofe, J., “Notes on Echinodermata from the Mountain Limestone,” Geol. Mag., II, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1822–3. Schlotheim, E. F. von. Nachtrage zur Petrefactenkunde, Gotha.Google Scholar
1930. Schmidt, W. E., “Die Echinodermen des deutschen Unterkarbons,” Jahrb. Preus. Geol. Landesanst, 122, 1–90.Google Scholar
1878. Sladen, W. P., “On the genus Poteriocrinus and Allied Forms,” Proc. West Riding Geol. and Polytech. Soc., N.S.I., 242.Google Scholar
1911. Smith, J., “Carboniferous Limestone Rocks of the Isle of Man,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xiv, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1930. Smyth, L. B., “The Carboniferous Rocks of Hook Head, Co. Wexford,” Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., xxxix, B, No. 26, 523.Google Scholar
1900. Sollas, W. J., “On Brahmacrinus,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lvi, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1911. Springer, F., “New American Fossil Crinoids,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, xxx, 117.Google Scholar
1920. Springer, F., “The Crinoidea Flexibilia,” Smithson. Inst., Washington, publ. 2501.Google Scholar
1926. Springer, F., “American Silurian Crinoids,” Smithson. Inst., Washington, pub. 2871.Google Scholar
1926. Springer, F., “Unusual Forms of Fossil Crinoids,” Proc U.S. Nat. Mus., 67, art. 9.Google Scholar
1879. Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F.. “Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea,” Proc. Nat. Sci. Philad., 226–318.Google Scholar
1879. Wachsmuth, C., Proc. Nat. Sci. Philad.., 177–411.Google Scholar
1879. Wachsmuth, C., Proc. Nat. Sci. Philad.., 225–364.Google Scholar
1879. Wachsmuth, C., Proc. Nat. Sci. Philad.., 64–226.Google Scholar
1879. Wachsmuth, C., “North American Crinoidea Camerata,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, xx and xxi, with atlas, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
1931. Wanner, J., “Echinodermata,” Overdruk uit Leidsche Mededeelunger, Deel v, Leiden.Google Scholar
1924. Wright, J., “A Woodocrinus Fauna from the Scottish Border,” Geol. Mag., LXI, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1925. Wright, J., “Notes on the Occurrence of Crinoids in the Carboniferous Limestones in Scotland,” Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc., xi, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1928. Wright, J., “A Rare Euryocrinus from the Carboniferous Limestone of Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe,” Geol. Mag., LXV, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1932. Wright, J., “The Scottish Species of Allagecrinus ,” Geol. Mag., LXIX, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1933. Wright, J., “Two New Crinoids from the Scottish Carboniferous Limestones, with Notes on the Allagecrinidae ,” Geol. Mag., LXX, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1934. Wright, J., “New Scottish and Irish Fossil Crinoids,” Geol. Mag., LXXI, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1934. Wright, J., “Note on the Occurrence of Blastoids with brachioles at Hook Head, Co. Wexford, Ireland,” Geol. Mag., LXXI, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1913. Zittel-Eastman, . Text Book of Palaeontology, 2nd ed. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correction to Wright, 1934, p. 253. In Diagnosis of Synerocrinus (?) smithi sp. nov., for “IBr one to three”, read “iBr two, iBr one to three”.Google Scholar