Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:08:43.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy in the southern and central Amanos Mountains, south central Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. T. Dean ,
O. Monod  and
Yilmaz Günay
W. T. Dean
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, Cardiff, UK
O. Monod
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Géologie Historique, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France
Yilmaz Günay
Affiliation:
Turkish Petroleum Corporation (T.P.A.O.), Ankara, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Formations of Cambrian and Ordovician age originally identified by the letters A to E in the southern Amanos Mountains are reviewed using lithostratigraphic units known from the western Taurus Mountains and south-eastern Turkey. The youngest Cambrian rocks in the southern Amanos belong to the Sosink Formation and their age, based on trilobite evidence, ranges from the Badulesia Zone to the Solenopleuropsis Zone of the Middle Cambrian; they are overlain unconformably by conglomerates dated as Triassic? by means of plant fossils. Ordovician rocks – Seydişehir Formation (approx. Arenig) and Bedinan Formation (Caradoc in part) – are exposed further north, in the central Amanos. The unusual position of the allochthonous ophiolites, which rest in part directly upon Lower Palaeozoic rocks, is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 123 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 215 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica, Part I, Crustacea Formationis Transitions, fasc. 2, pp. 21–92. Lipsiae (Lund): Sampson & Wallin.Google Scholar
Atan, O. 1969. Geology of the Amanos Mountains (Eğribucak–Karacaören–Ceylanli–Dasevleri). Madan Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Yayinlarindan 139.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1846. Notice préliminaire sur le Système silurien et les Trilobites de Bohême. Leipsic: Barrande, vi + 97pp.Google Scholar
Bergeron, J. 1889. Étude géologique du massif ancien situé au Sud du Plateau Central. Paris: Annales des Sciences geologiques 22, iv + 362 p.Google Scholar
Beyrich, E. 1845. Ueber einige böhmische Trilobiten. Berlin: G. Reimer, 47pp.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1822. Les Trilobites. In Histoire naturelle des Crustacés fossiles, sous les rapports zoologiques et géologiques (Brongniart, A. and Desmarest, A. G.), pp. 1–65 Paris: F.-G. Levrault, vii + 154pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunn, J. H. 1961. Les sutures ophiolotiques. Contribution à l'étude des relations entre phénomènes magmatiques et orogéniques. Revue de Géographie physique et de Géologie dynamique 4, 89–96, 181–202.Google Scholar
Courtessole, R. 1973. Le Cambrien moyen de la Montague Noire. Toulouse, 241pp.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W. 1968. Acadian Geology. The Geological Structure, Organic Remains and Mineral Resources of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, xxvi + 694pp.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1975. Cambrian and Ordovician correlation and trilobite distribution in Turkey. Fossils and Strata 5, 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1980. Correlation of Ordovician rocks in the Near and Middle East. Publications of the International Union of Geological Sciences 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1982. Middle Cambrian trilobites from the Sosink Formation, Derik-Mardin district, south-eastern Turkey. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 36, 1–41.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. & Krummenacher, R. 1961. Cambrian trilobites from the Amanos Mountains, Turkey. Palaeontology 4, 71–81.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. & Monod, O. 1983. A new interpretation of Ordovician stratigraphy in the Bahçe area, northern Amanos Mountains, south central Turkey. Geological Magazine 122, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T., Monod, O. & Perinçek, D. 1981. Correlation of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in southeastern Turkey. Petroleum Activities at the 100th Year (100 Yilda Petrol Faaliyeti). Türkiye Cumhuriyet Petrol Isleri Genel Müdürlüğü Dergisi, Ankara, 25, 269–91 (in English), 292–300 (in Turkish).Google Scholar
Dubertret, L. 1936. Stratigraphie des régions recouvertes par les roches vertes du Nord-Ouest de la Syrie. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 203, 1173–5.Google Scholar
Dubertret, L. 1937. Sur les lambeaux de brèches tectoniques à la surface des roches vertes syriennes. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 204, 283–5.Google Scholar
Dubertret, L. 1955. Géologie des Roches Vertes du Nord-Ouest de la Syrie et du Hatay (Turquie). Notes et Mémoires sur le Moyen-Orient 6, 5–179.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. M., Monod, O., Braud, J. & Perinçek, D. (in press). The Hezan Units: a fragment of the Tethyan margin in SE Turkey.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographic der böhmischen Trilobiten. Prague: Königlich böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 5 (5), 176pp.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1935. New Middle Cambrian agnostian trilobites from Vermont. Journal of Paleontology 9, 218–21.Google Scholar
Ishmawi, R. el. 1972. Geologie des nördlichen Mittelteils des Amanos-Gebirges zwischen Islahiye und Bahçe (S-Türkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 34–63.Google Scholar
Janetzko, P. 1972. Geologische Untersuchungen an der Ostflanke des südlichen Amanos-Gebirges zwischen Islahiye und Hassa (Sudtürkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 3–33.Google Scholar
Kellogg, H. E. 1960. The geology of the Derik-Mardin area, southeastern Turkey. Reports of the Exploration Division, American Overseas Petroleum Limited, Ankara (unpublished).Google Scholar
Ketin, I. 1966. Cambrian outcrops in southeastern Turkey and their comparison with the Cambrian of east Iran. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey 66, 77–89.Google Scholar
Kober, L. 1915. Geologische Forschungen in Vorderasien. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 91, 1–379.Google Scholar
Lahner, L. 1972. Geologische Untersuchungen an der Ostflanke des mittleren Amanos (SE-Türkei). Geotektonischen Forschungen 42, 64–96.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, G. 1983. De undre Paradoxideslagren vid Andrarum. Sveriges geologische Undersökelse (C) 54, 1–48.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1922. Description de quelques trilobites du Cambrien du Maroc. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France 22, 285–90.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1979. Cambrian. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part A. Introduction (ed. Robison, R. A. and Teichert, C.), A119–A135. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Parrot, J. F. 1977. Assemblage ophiolitique du Baer Bassit et termes effusifs du volcano-sédimentaire. Pétrologie d'un fragment de la croûte océanique téthysienne charriée sur la plateforme syrienne. Travaux et Documents ORSTOM, série Géologique 6, 97–126.Google Scholar
Pompeckj, J. F. 1901. Versteinerungen der Paradoxides-Stufe von La Cabitza in Sardinien und Bemerkungen zur Gliederung des sardischen Cambrium. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologische Gesellschaft 53, 1–23.Google Scholar
Ponikarov, V. P., Kazmin, V. G. & Mikhailov, I. A. 1967. The geology of Syria. Explanatory notes on the geological map of Syria (1/500000) Part I Damas. Department of Geological and Mineral Resources of Syria. 228pp.Google Scholar
Ricou, L.-E. 1971. Le croissant ophiolitique périarabe: une ceinture de nappes mises en place au Crétacé supérieur. Revue de Géographie physique et de Géologie dynamique 13, 327–50.Google Scholar
Rigo de Righi, M. & Cortesini, A. 1964. Gravity tectonics in the foothills structure belt of southeast Turkey. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 48, 1911–37.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. von. 1823. Nachträge zur Petrefactenkunde. Gotha: Becker 'sche Buchhandlung, 44pp.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. C. 1965. Proposed rock unit nomenclature. Petroleum District V. SE-Turkey (autochthonous terrain). Chart I. Ankara. Stratigraphic Commission of the Turkish Association of Petroleum Geologists.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. E. 1942. Die mittelkambrische Fauna von Doberlug. Jahrbuch des Reichsamts für Bodenforschung 62, 344–402.Google Scholar
Schwan, W. 1971, Geology and tectonics of the central Amanos mountains. In Geology and History of Turkey (ed. Campbell, A. S.), pp. 283–303. Tripoli: The Petroleum Exploration Society of Libya.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1968. Trilobites del Cámbrico medio de Asturias. Trabajos de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Oviedo 1, 77–133.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1971. La subdivisión bioestratigráfica y la correlación del Cámbrico medio de España. Congreso Hispano-Luso-Americano Geología Económica [Trabajos]. No. 1, Sección 1, v.2. [Madrid], 769–82.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1972. Das Kambrium der acadobaltischen Faunenprovinz. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie II, 1–91.Google Scholar
Selçuk, H. 1981. Etude géologique de la partie méridionale du Hatay (Turquie). Thèse de l'Université de Genève, Section Sciences de la Terre, No. 1997, 116pp.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1957. Předběžná zpráva o nových trilobitech z českého středího kambria. Věstník Ústředniho Ústavu Geologického Praha 32, 235–44.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1958. Trilobiti českého středního kambria. Rozpravy Ústředniho Ústavu Ģeologického 24, 1–236 (in Czech), 237–80 (in English).Google Scholar
Thoral, M. 1935. Contribution à l'étude paléontologique de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire et révision sommaire de lafaune cambrienne de la Montagne Noire. Montpellier: Imprimerie de la Charité, 362pp.Google Scholar
Thoral, M. 1946. Conocoryphidae languedociens. Annales de l'Université de Lyon, Sciences naturelles, 92pp.Google Scholar
Thoral, M. 1947. Trois nouveaux genres de Trilobites acadiens du Languedoc et d'Espagne. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris 224, 59–60.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1821. Petrificata telluris Svecanae. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, 8 1–116.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. On the Cambrian faunas of North America. Preliminary studies. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 10, 281–355.Google Scholar
Yalçin, N. 1980. Amanoslarin litolojik karakterleri ve Güneydoğu Anadolu'nun tektonik evrimindeki anlami. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 23, 21–30.Google Scholar