No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
This boring, though confined to the Kimeridge Clay, is of some interest, partly because it has proved the thickness of that clay to be much greater than it was supposed to be in this part of Wiltshire, and partly because it has yielded a species of Aporrhais or Harpagodes which has not previously been found in England.
page 445 note 1 “Beiträge zur Geschichte der Archosaurier”: Geol. u. pal., Abh. 1914.
page 445 note 2 Dr. G. A. Boulenger and Mr. D. M. S. Watson Propose to reintroduce Owen's term ‘Thecodontia’, but the types on which he erected this order are: Stagonolepis, Belodon, Cladyodon, Thecodontosaurus, Palœosaurus, and Bathygnathus. They belong to very different orders.
page 446 note 1 The apparent discrepancy between 400 and 412 feet is due to the fact that the Contractor bored an additional depth of 12 feet at his own cost.
page 447 note 1 Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie, vol. xvi, p. 140, pl. ix, figs. 15–17, 1872.
page 448 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxvi, p. 197, 1880.
page 448 note 2 Geology of the Isle of Purbeck, etc. (Mem. Geol. Surv.), 1898, p. 52.