Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:47:39.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.—The Fundamental Problems of Petrogenesis, or the Origin of the Igneous Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Franz Lœwinson-Lessing
Affiliation:
Professor of Mineralogy and Geology, Polytechnic Institute, Sosnovka, St. Petersburg, Russia; For. Corr. Geol. Soc. London.

Extract

The second fundamental problem of petrogenesis is the following question:—By what processes have there been derived, from the original magma or magmas, all other magmas known as igneous rocks? It is now almost universally admitted that many igneous rocks are genetically connected and produced from an original magma by differentiation, and that in many cases differentiation may be considered as liquation or separating into secondary magmas. But is differentiation (Spaltungen) alone sufficient to explain the formation of all igneous rocks? And by what is a magma stimulated to differentiation? These are two questions which must be elucidated. It must be first of all emphasized that not every magma is subject to differentiation. My standpoint is that the principal factors producing and regulating differentiation are on one side the process of crystallization (differentiation by crystallization, Krystallizations-differenzierung), and on the other the chemical composition of the magma and its tendency to the formation of eutectics (magmatic differentiation).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 289 note 1 Lœwinson-Lessing, F., “Petrographical Notices. 4. Differentiation, Eutectics, and Entropy”: Ann. Inst. Polyt. St. Pétersbourg, vi, p. 279, 1906.Google Scholar

page 290 note 1 Harker, A., “The Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1904.Google Scholar Natural History of Igneous Rocks, p. 356.Google Scholar It must be remembered of course that Harker considers such cases as exceptional, and is an adversary of assimilation on a large scale.

page 290 note 2 Daly, R., “The Origin of Augite Andesite and of related Ultra-basic Rocks”: Jour. Geol., 1908, p. 401.Google Scholar

page 290 note 3 Daly, R., “Secondary Origin of certain Granites”: Amer. Jour. Sci., xx (4), p. 185, 1905.Google Scholar

page 290 note 4 Daly, R., CM. пpиM. иa CTP., 123.Google Scholar

page 290 note 5 Becke, F., “Die Eruptivgesteine des böhmischen Mittelgebirges u. d. Amerik. Anden. Atlantische a. pazifische Sippe der Eruptivgesteine”: T.M.P.M., xxii, p. 209, 1903.Google Scholar

page 290 note 6 Suess, E., Das Antlitz der Erde, iii, ii, 679, 1909.Google Scholar

page 291 note 1 Klemm, G., “Beobachtungen über die genetischen Bezielnmgen der Odenwälder Gabbros und Diorite”: Notizbl. Ver. Erdkunde Grosh. geol. Landesanstalt Darmstadt (4), xxvii, 1906.Google Scholar

page 291 note 2 Adams, F., “On the Origin of the Amphibolites of the Laurentian Area of Canada”: Jour. Geol., xvii, p. 7, 1909.Google Scholar

page 291 note 3 Haug, E., Traité de Géologie.Google Scholar

page 291 note 4 Philipp, H., “Vorläufige Mittheilungen über Resorptions- und Injectionserscheinungen im südl. Schwarzwald”: Centrbl. Min., 1907, p. 76.Google Scholar

page 291 note 5 Termier, E., “Sur le granite alcalin du Filfla (Algérie)”: C. R., 1902.Google Scholar

page 291 note 6 Munteanu-Murgoci, , Ueber die Einschliisse von Granat-Vesuvianfels in dem Serpentin des Paringu-Massivs, 1901.Google Scholar

page 291 note 7 Mackie, , “On Differences in Chemical Composition between the Central and the Marginal Zones of Granite Veins, with further evidence of exchanges between such veins and contact rocks”: Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc, viii, p. 98, 1901.Google Scholar

page 291 note 8 Sauer, A., “Ueber petrographische Studien an den Lavabomben aus dem Ries“: Jahresh. Ver. vaterl. Nat. Württemb., lvii, 1901.Google Scholar

page 291 note 9 Michel-Lévy, A., Mémoire sur le porphyre bleu de I'Esterel, 1897.Google Scholar

page 291 note 10 Lacroix, A., Guide des excursions, Congrès de Paris, 1900.Google Scholar

page 291 note 11 Lemberg, J., Z. d. g. G., 1872.Google Scholar

page 291 note 12 Doelter, C., “Chemisehe Zusammensetzung u. Genesis der Monzoni-Gesteine”: T.M.P.M., 1902, p. 206.Google Scholar

page 291 note 13 Gürieh, , “Granit u. Gneiss”: Himmel u. Erde, xvii, p. 6, 1905.Google Scholar

page 291 note 14 Högbom, A., “Pre-Cambrian Geology of Sweden”: Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, x, 1910.Google Scholar

page 291 note 15 Hugi, , “Vorläufige Mitteilung über Untersuchungen in der nördlichen Gneiszone des zentralen Aarmassivs”: Eclogsæ Geol. Helvet., ix, No. 4, 1907.Google Scholar

page 291 note 16 Sollas, , Trans. Roy. Ir. Acad., xxx, p. 505, 1894.Google Scholar

page 291 note 17 Cole, Grenville, Sci. Trans. Roy. Dublin Soc. (2), vi, p. 246, 1897.Google Scholar The last two authors are cited after Harker, , Natural History of Igneous Rocks, p. 338.Google Scholar

page 291 note 18 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Com. Géol. Finlande, No. 3, 1907.Google Scholar

page 292 note 1 Brögger, W., Die Eruptivgesteine des Kristianiagebiets. III. Das Ganggefolge des Laurdalits. 1898.Google Scholar

page 292 note 2 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Etudes de pétrographie générale, avec un mémoire sur les roehes éruptives d'une partie du Caucase Central”, p. 178: Trans. Soc. Nat. St. Pétersbourg, 1898.Google Scholar “Studien über die Eruptivgesteine”, p. 187: Compt. rend. VII Congr. Géol., 1899.Google Scholar See also the Proceedings of the Congress of St. Petersburg, p. elviii.

page 292 note 3 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Petrographical Notices. 3. Is there a difference in the chemical composition of the intrusive and the effusive rocks?”: Ann. Inst. Polyt. St. Pétersb., vi, p. 274, 1906.Google Scholar

page 292 note 4 “Differentiation, Eutecties, and Entropy”: loc. cit.

page 293 note 1 Daly, E., “Origin of the Alkaline Rocks”: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxi, p. 117, 1910.Google Scholar

page 293 note 2 Læwinson-Lessing, F., Studien üher die Eruptivgesteine, p. 188.Google Scholar

page 293 note 3 Ibid., p. 183.

page 293 note 4 Læwinson-Lessing, F., “Kritische Beiträge zur Systematik der Eruptivgesteine: I. Zur Chemie der Magmen”: T.M.P.M., xix, p. 299, 1900.Google Scholar

page 293 note 5 “Studien über die Eruptivgesteine.”

page 293 note 6 Schweig, M., “Untersuchungen über die Differentiation der Magmen”: N.J., Beil. Bd., xvii, p. 516, 1903.Google Scholar

page 295 note 1 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 23, 1907.Google Scholar

page 296 note 1 Sederholm, J., “Om Granit och Gneiss”: Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 23, 1907.Google Scholar

page 296 note 2 Lukaschewitch, O., The Inorganic Life of the Earth. Part II, The Life of the Rocks. St. Petersburg, 1909.Google Scholar

page 296 note 3 Branca, , Centralbl. f. Mineral., 1909, p. 135.Google Scholar

page 296 note 4 Haug, E., Traité de Gélogie.Google Scholar

page 296 note 5 Cited by Lacroix, , Mont Pelée, ii, p. 56.Google Scholar

page 296 note 6 Dutton, , The High Plateaux of Utah, 1880, p. 125.Google Scholar

page 296 note 7 Schwarz, E., “Hot Springs”: GEOL. MAG., 1907, No. 480, p. 258.Google Scholar

page 296 note 8 Delesse, , Etudes sur le métamorphisme, 1862, pp. 157220.Google Scholar

page 297 note 1 Hunt, Sterry, “The Origin of the Crystalline Rocks”: Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, ii, p. 3, 1884.Google Scholar