Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:16:30.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—On Some Spined Myriapads from the Carboniferous Series of England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Henry Woodward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Paleontologists are largely indebted to Messrs. Meek and JL Worthen for their very careful researches in the Coal-Measures of Illinois, which have resultedinsuch large and valuable accessions to the fauna and flora of the Carboniferous formation. Not the least interesting of these has been the discovery of numerous organisms, which were first recognized and correctly described by themin1868 as the remains of spined Myriapods.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1887 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1887

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 Geol. Surv. Illinois, vol. iii. pp. 558–559.Google Scholar

page 1 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1863, vol. xix. p. 86, fig. 8.Google Scholar

page 1 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xvi. p. 268.Google Scholar

page 2 note 1 Not an accurate representation of the fossil described by Salter.

page 2 note 2 Trans. Glasgow, Geol. Soc. vol. ii. pp. 234–238, pl. iii.Google Scholar

page 3 note 1 Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 1882, vol. iii. no. v. p. 148.Google Scholar

page 3 note 2 Amer. Journ. Sci. Arts, vol. xlvi. p. 20Google Scholar. See also Geol. Surv. Illinois, iii. 556.Google Scholar

page 3 note 3 See GEOL. MAG. Vol. VIII. p. 102, PI. III. Fig. 6 a, b, c.Google Scholar

page 3 note 4 Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. vol. iii. no. v. pp. 143–182, pi. x.–xiii.Google Scholar

page 3 note 5 Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. I list. vol. iii. no. ix. 1884Google Scholar, “On two new and diverse types of Carboniferous Myriapods,” pp. 283–297, pi. xxvi. and xxvii.Google Scholar

page 3 note 6 Scudder's Trichiulus vilhsus was also covered with fine hairs; but this supposed Myriapod now proves to be the circinate vernation of a fern!

page 4 note 1 Not originated from a fusion of two primitively distinct segments, but from a later imperfect division of each of the primitive segments into two, and the supply to each of the divisions of a primitive segment of a complete set of organs.”— (Balfour, , Embryology, vol. i. p. 392.)Google Scholar

page 4 note 2 This is shown to be merely E. ferox, Salter, sp.; see ante, p. 2Google Scholar, and infra, p. 6.Google Scholar

page 5 note 1 Handbuch der Palseontolojie von Karl A. Zittel, Miinchen. I. Abtheilung, II. Band, V. Lieferung—Myriopoda, Arachnoidea, und Insecta. Bearbeitet von Samuel H. Scudder (1886).

page 5 note 2 These numbers must now be reduced by four Carboniferous and one Dyas species.

page 6 note 1 Scudder, , however, inhis Memoir (loc. cit.), 1882, p. 157Google Scholar, cites me as still considering it to be a Eurypterus, whereas I most clearly state: “I am fully disposed to agree with Meek and Worthen, and to refer it to the Myrinpoda and to their genus Euphoheria, feeling certain that it has no relation whatever to Eurypterus” (Pal.Soc. Mon. p. 173Google Scholar; GEOL. MAG. Vol. X. p. 112).Google Scholar