^{page 386 note 1} Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 386 note 2} Ibid. vol. xxvi. (1870), pp. 227, 230, and 232, pl. xvi. fig. 7.

^{page 386 note 3} Petrefaetenkunde, , 1820, p. 49.Google Scholar

^{page 386 note 4} Sowerby, J., Min. Con. vol. ii. p. 213Google Scholar, pl. cxciv. 1818; Clarke, W. B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 8.Google Scholar

^{page 386 note 5} A. d'Orbigny, Pal. Franç;. Terr. Jur. vol. i. 1842, p. 149Google Scholar, pl. xxvi.; Moore, C., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxvi. (1870), pp. 230–232.Google Scholar

^{page 386 note 6} Clarke, W. B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 386 note 7} Etheridge, R., fil.,inJack and Etheridge, Geology and Palæontology of Queensland and New Guinea, 1892, p. 502.Google Scholar

^{page 387 note 1} Clarke, W. B., “On Marine Fossiliferous Secondary FormationsinAustralia”, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 8.Google Scholar

^{page 387 note 2} C. Moore, “Australian Mesozoic Geology and Palæontology”, ibid. vol. xxvi. (1870), pp. 230–232.

^{page 387 note 3} Prod, de Paléont. Stratigr. vol. i. (1850), p. 260.Google Scholar

^{page 387 note 4} Min. Con. vol. ii. p. 213, pl. cxciv. 1818. This name was preoccupied by Fichtel and Mollin1803, and hence altered by d'Orbigny to subsimtatus.Google Scholar

^{page 387 note 5} Pal. Franç. Terr. Jur. vol. i. 1842, p. 149, pl. xxvi.Google Scholar

^{page 388 note 1} Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. [6], vol. v. p. 273, fig. 7. When the specimen here represented was figured the locality was not known, but Mr. Etheridge, F.R.S.,inwhose collection the specimen was originally, tells the writer that the “D” written in ink upon the specimen means “Dundry”.Google Scholar

^{page 388 note 2} Hin. Con. vol. ii. p. 53, pl. cxxv. 1816.Google Scholar

^{page 388 note 3} Ibid. p. 183, pi. clxxxii. 1817.

^{page 388 note 4} Études paléontologiques sur les dépôts jurassiques du Bassin du Rhône, pt. 3, p. 54, pi. viii. ff. 3, 4; f. 3 especially.

^{page 388 note 5} Statistique géologique, minéralogique, minérallurgique, et paléontologique du Départment de la Meuse, 1852, Atlas, p. 46, pi. xxxi. ff. 23–25.

^{page 388 note 6} Études paléontologiques sur les dépôts jurassiques du Bassin du Rhône, pt. 4, p. 44, pi. vii. ff. 1–5.

^{page 390 note 1} Pal. Franç. Terr. Jur. Vol. i. 1842, p. 392Google Scholar, pl. cxxx. ff. 3, 4 (5 ?); Buckman, S. S., Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. vi. 1892, p. 304, pl. xlix. f. 4, and pl. lli. ff. 8–24.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 2} Pal. Franç. Terr. Jur. vol. i. 1842, p. 222Google Scholar, pl. lvii. D'Orbigny wrote the name as Thouarsensis, which spelling has been adopted by most authors except E. Deslongchamps, who wrote Ammonites toarcensis. Mr. Buckman, S. S. [Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. iv. 1890, p. 172] adopts the spelling toarcensis, “since the name is taken from Thouars, a towninDeux Sèvres, of which the correct Latin name is Toarcium”.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 3} Min. Conch. vol. v. p. 23, pi. ccccxxi. f. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 4} See Denckmann, , “Ueber die geognostischen Verhältnisse Umgegend von Dörnten nördlich Goslar”, Abhandlungen zur geologischen Specialkarte von Preussen und den Thüringischen Staaten, vol. viii. pt. 2, 1887Google Scholar, pl. viii. f. 4; pl. x. f. 9; and Buckman, S. S., Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. iv. 1890, pi. xxix. f. 3.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 5} Branco, W., “Der untere Dogger Deutsch-Lothringens”, Abhandlungen zur geologischen Specialkarte von Elsass-Lothringen, vol. ii. (i.), p. 77, pl. ii. ff. 1–4.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 6} W. Branco, ibid. p. 84, pl. iii. ff. 3, 4, 5; pl. iv. f. 1.

^{page 390 note 7} Haug, E., “Polymorphidæ”, Neues Jahrbuch, 1887, vol. iiGoogle Scholar. pl. v. f. 5, and woodcut 6c, p. 137; and Buckman, S. S., Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. vi. 1892. p. 262, pls. xlvi. and xlvii.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 8} D'Orbigny, Pal. Franç. Terr. Jur. vol. i. 1842, p. 230, pl. lx.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 9} Clarke, W. B., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 390 note 10} C. Moore, ibid. vol. xxvi. (1870), pp. 230, 232, pi. xv. f. 1.

^{page 390 note 11} W. B. Clarke, ibid. vol. xxiii. (1867), p. 8; C. Moore, ibid. vol. xxvi. (1870), pp. 230, 232, pl. xv. f. 2.

^{page 391 note 1} Lycett, , The Cotteswold Hills, 1857, p. 122Google Scholar, pl. i. fig. 2. (The suture-line representedinfig. 2a does not, according to Mr. S. S. Buckman, belong to this species. Mr. Buckman gives the suture-line of Lycett's figured specimen in his Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. v. 1891, pl. xliv. f. 9.)

^{page 391 note 2} Buckman, S. S., Inf. Ool. Amm. (Mon. Pal. Soc), pt. iv. 1890, p. 188.Google Scholar

^{page 391 note 3} Maris protogaæ Nautilos et Argonautos, etc., figs. 39, 40.

^{page 393 note 1} Min. Con. vol. i. p. 117, pl. liv.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 2} Pal. Franç. Terr. Jur. vol. i. 1842, p. 465, pl. clxviii.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 3} Trans. Geol. Soc. [2], vol. vii. 1847, p. 196, pl. xxiii. f. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 4} Pal. Mittheil. vol. ii. pl. 81, ff. 4a-e.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 5} Palæontogr. vol. xxvii. (1881), p. 158, pi. xxviii.Google Scholar

^{page 393 note 6} Min. Con. vol. vi. p. 121, pl. dlxiii.Google Scholar