Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:55:47.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—On A Collection of Fossils From the Lower Greensand of Great Chart, in Kent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. W. Gregory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rarity and imperfect preservation of the fossils in the upper part of the Lower Greensand, in the south-east of England, has always added considerably to the difficulties in the study of that series. The Atherfield Clay and the Hythe Beds both have well-marked faunas, though fossils are often absent from the latter. The palæontological evidence is, however, much less satisfactory in the case of the two uppermost of the four divisions into which the Lower Greensand is usually divided. A fair number of fossils occurs in these at Folkestone, but further to the west the lithological nature of the beds changes, and fossils are found in but few localities.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , March 1895 , pp. 97 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1895

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 100 note 1 Meyer, C. J. A., “On the Cretaceous Rocks of Beer Head …” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxx. 1874, p. 385.Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Barrois, C., “L'âge des couches de Blackdown (Devonshire),” Ann. Soc. géol. Nord. t. iii. 1876, pp. 1 –8. “Recherches sur le terrain Crétacé supérieur de l'angleterre et de l'irlande,” Mém. Soc. géol. Nord. t. i. 1876, p. 69.Google Scholar

page 101 note 1 Jukes-Browne, A. J., “The Geology of Devizes, with Remarks on the Grouping of Cretaceous Deposits,” Proc. Geol. Assoc. vol. xii. 1892, pp. 264–266.Google Scholar

page 101 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xl. 1884, p. 736.Google Scholar

page 102 note 1 At a recent meeting of the Geological Society, Mr. T. Leighton announced the discovery of a fossil in the Folkestone Sands. This is a cone which has been identified by Mr. Carruthers as Pinites hexagonus, Carr. (GEOL. MAG. 1871, Vol. VIII. pp. 540–544, Pl. XV.), a species previously known from the Upper Gault (zone ix.) of Eastware Bay. It is interesting to find that the only known fossil from the Folkestone Sands inland is a Gault species.Google Scholar

page 102 note 2 Gaudry, A., “Sur la découvert de l' Ostraea Leymerii à Wissant (Pas-de-Calais),” Bull. Soc. géol. France, sér. 2, t. xvii. p. 32.Google Scholar

page 102 note 3 Cole, G. A. J., “Aids in Practical Geology,” ed. 2, 1893, p. 387.Google Scholar

page 102 note 4 Barrois, C., “Sur le Gault et sur les couches entre lesquelles il est compris dans le bassin de Paris,” Ann. Soc. géol. Nord. t. ii. 1875, p. 56.Google Scholar

page 102 note 5 Price, F. G. H., “On the Lower Greensand and Gault of Folkestone,” Proc. Geol. Assoc, vol. iv. 1875, p. 139.Google Scholar

page 102 note 6 The frequent “very decided passage from one to the other” (i.e. Folkestone Beds to Gault) has been pointed out by Mr. Topley. “On the Lower Cretaceous Beds of the Bas-Boulonnais.” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxiv. 1868, p. 474.Google Scholar