Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:39:08.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—The Unconformable Relationship of the Lower Tertiaries and Upper Cretaceous of New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

James Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the question of conformity or unconformity between the Lower Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous, there is associated a problem of great economic importance to New Zealand. The subject involves something more than a mere academic discussion. If conformity exists, then we have only one coal-bearing formation; but if unconformity, then we have two. I believe that both the stratigraphical and palæontological evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of the latter.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 8 , Issue 12 , December 1911 , pp. 539 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 546 note 1 Geol. Reports, 1885, pp. 164–9Google Scholar.

page 547 note 1 Park, , “Marine Tertiaries of Otago and Canterbury”: Trans.N.Z. Inst., vol. xxxiii, pp. 489–550, 1904Google Scholar.

page 559 note 1 Bell, J. M. & Clarke, E. de E., “The Geology of the Whangaroa Subdivision”: Bulletin No. 8, N.s., p. 58.Google Scholar