Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:17:39.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—On some Fossil Coniferous Fruits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

William Carruthers
Affiliation:
Botanical Department, British Museum.

Extract

It was my intention to have devoted this paper to the Coniferous Fruits found in Strata of Secondary age in Britain, reserving for future examination, those belonging to the later periods, but in the progress of my investigations I have found that, two remarkable cones, which have hitherto been considered as belonging to the Greensand, are certainly Tertiaryfossils; and having placed them on the plates which illustrate this paper, I shall include them in my descriptions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1866

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 535 note 1 Lindley spelled this word Dion, omitting the second o, after the example of the ancients—as, for example, εϰωσμòѕ, (Aristotle, Hist. Anim.) Dioon is therefore incorrect.

page 536 note 1 A striking illustration of the futility of the opposite course to that advocated above is afforded by the fossil known as Strobilites Woodwardii, Lindl. Göppert, in his “ Fossilen Coniferen,” p. 210, establishes the genus Laricites for this fossil, it being the only known species of the genus. Professor Heer, however, when, some timeago, examining the Tertiary fossils in the British Museum, showed my colleague, Mr. H. Woodward, that it was only the axis of a cone, with the scales bitten off, (by a squirrel?) leaving thin stumps, I have examined the specimens and am satisfied that this is really the case.