Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:20:23.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—Notes on Some Fossil Bivalved Entomostraca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

T. Rupert Jones
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Notes and references accumulating for some years have induced me to offer some remarks on a new fossil Estheria, and on some already known, of Carboniferous, of Permian, and of Triassic age; also a description of some fossil Ostracoda from the Ironstone of Shotover, near Oxford, involving remarks on all the known Wealden species; and lastly notes on some species found in the Purbeck strata of the Subwealden Boring, near Battle, in Sussex.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , March 1878 , pp. 100 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1878

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 100 note 1 Estheria and its congener the Limnadia received much elucidation at the hands of ProfGrube, E., of Breslau, in his memoir “Ueber die Gattungen Estheria und Limnadia,” etc., in the Archir für Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang xxxi. 1865Google Scholar.

page 101 note 1 Estheria Adamsii and E. Peachii were figured and described on the same occasion, loc. cit. Pl. IX. Figs. 1 and 17. E. punctatella had been already added to the list of Carboniferous Estheriæ, in the Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, 1865, pl. i. fig. 3.

page 101 note 2 Geol. Mag. Series II. Vol. III. p. 576.Google Scholar

page 101 note 3 “Die fossilen Thiere aus der Steinkohlenformation von Saarbrücken,” Heft ii.

page 104 note 1 Hampshire is included in the “Hastings Sand” Column, and Kent, Sussex, Hampshire, and Isle of Wight in the “Purbeck” Column of the Table, at page 352, evidently from inadvertence.

page 105 note 1 In the “Catalogue of the Collection of Fossils in the Museum of Practical Geology,” 1865, p. 254, the following are enumerated:—

Some of these names have evidently been adopted from Forbes.

page 106 note 1 Brady, , Crosskey, , and Robertson's, Monogr. Brit. Post-Tertiary Entom., Pal. Soc. 1874, p. 110, etc.Google Scholar

page 106 note 2 “Description des Entomostraces fossiles des Terrains tertiaires de la France et de la Belgique,” Mém. cour. Acad. Roy. Belg., vol. xxiv. 1852; page 47 of the separate memoir.Google Scholar

page 107 note 1 Monogr. Post-Tertiary Entom. 1874, p. 141, pl. 2, fig. 13.

page 107 note 2 We may remark that fig. 25, on the same plate, representing Candona Kotahensis, from the Jurassic beds of India, has almost exactly the outline of the recent Candona lactea.

page 108 note 1 Jones, T. Rupert, Monogr. Tert. Entom., Pal. Soc, 1856, p. 19, pl. 1, figs. 5 and 8Google Scholar: Brady, G. S., Monogr. Rec. Brit. Entom., Trans. Linn. Soc., 1868, p. 383, pl. 25, figs. 1–9Google Scholar: Brady, , Crosskey, , and Robertson, , Monogr. Brit. Post-Tert. Entom., Pal. Soc., 1874, p. 135, pl. 2, figs. 29, 30.Google Scholar

page 108 note 2 Trans. Zool. Soc. vol. v. (1866), p. 368, pl. 58, fig. 9Google Scholar.