No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
I do not hesitate to say that Dr. Eoberts could not have written the letter which appears in this Magazine for December, 1881, if he had read my papers on Anglesey with care. Not only does he confound together things which I have expressly made to differ, but he attributes to me opinions which never existedineither my thoughts or my writings. I must remove some of these misapprehensions, before discussing the real questions in dispute.
page 55 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 02, 1880, p. 118.Google Scholar
page 55 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxvii. p. 223.Google Scholar
page 55 note 3 Incorrectly printed “limestone.”
page 57 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 02, 1881, p. 197.Google Scholar