No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
During the last few years there have passed through my hands for determination many specimens of a twig-like fossil-plant from the highest Silurian flaggy-sandstones of Victoria. These were usually too fragmentary to afford any very decided evidence as to their affinity, although their surfaces showed a close-textured and well-defined structure, referable to that of prosenchymatous wood-cells, and the stem had a definite central vascular axis, such as was first noticed by Hugh Miller in similar fossil remains from the Old Red Sandstone of Scotland.
page 438 note 1 Journ. Bot., n.s., vol. ii (11. 1873), No. 131, pp. 321–7, pl. 137.Google Scholar
page 438 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xv (1859), p. 478.Google Scholar
page 438 note 3 “Foss. Flora d. Ubergangs,” 1852, p. 88, pl. ii.
page 438 note 4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xv, p. 481, figs. 2a, b.Google Scholar
page 438 note 5 “Cat. Palæozoic Plants, Brit. Mus.,” 1886, p. 232.
page 439 note 1 “Notes on Erian (Devonian) Plants from New York and Pennsylvania”: Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. xvi (1893), pp. 105–14, pls. ix-xiv.Google Scholar
page 439 note 2 This graptolite, determined for the Survey by Dr. T. S. Hall, M.A., is typical of the Wenlock in England, but also ranges upwards into the Ludlows.
page 439 note 3 “Testimony of the Rocks,” 1857, pp. 428, 429, figs. 118, 119. Also Carruthers in Journ. of Botany, vol. ii (1873), pl. 137Google Scholar; especially fig. 4, specimen from the Isle of Stroma, off Caithness.