Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:46:06.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—On the Cause of the Depression and Re-elevation of the Land during the Glacial Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Thomas F. Jamieson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a paper published in the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society for January, 1860, p. 178, I drew attention to the remarkable fact that in various parts of the world the presence of glaciers had been attended by a submergence of the land, and I suggested that the enormous weight of ice laid upon the surface of the country might have caused a depression, while the melting of the ice would also account for the rising again of the land which seems to have everywhere followed some time after the ice disappeared.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 9 , Issue 9 , September 1882 , pp. 400 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1882

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 401 note 1 Macclesfield, Cheshire, see Geol. Mag. 1865, Vol. II. pp. 293–299.Google Scholar

page 402 note 1 Trans, of Halifax Institute, 8th May, 1866.

page 402 note 2 Quart. Journ. of the Geol. Soc. vol. i. p. 541.

page 403 note 1 A. Helland found the sp. grav. of the Greenland icebergs to be 886. See Quart. Journ. of the Geol. Soc. vol. xxxiii. p. 155, 02. 1877.Google Scholar

page 405 note 1 See Le Conte, J., On the Old River Beds of California, in the American Journal of Science, for 03, 1880.Google Scholar

page 406 note 1 Geol. Mag. 1872, pp. 392 and 485. Mr. Alfred Tylor calculated that a deposit of snow and ice 1500 feet thick over an area of land one-tenth of that of the sea, would reduce the level of the ocean 150 feet. He supposes a subsidence of 600 feet altogether.