Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:26:00.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—Cataclysmic Theories of Geological Climate1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

James Croll
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Scotland.

Extract

The most important geological problem, and the one of all others which at present excites the greatest attention, is the cause of those extraordinary changes of climate which have taken place during past ages. How are we to account for the cold and Arctic condition of things which prevailed in temperate regions during what is called the Glacial Epoch, or for the warm and temperate climate enjoyed by the Arctic regions, probably up to the Pole, during part of the Miocene and other periods? Theories of the cause of those changes, of the most diverse and opposite character, have been keenly advocated, and one important result of the discussions which have recently taken place is the narrowing of the field of inquiry and the bringing of the question within proper limits.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1878

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 391 note 1 British Association Report, 1876 (part 2), p. 11.

page 391 note 2 Proceedings of Royal Society, vol. xxvi. p. 51.Google Scholar

page 391 note 3 Transactions of Royal Society, vol. 167 (part 1).Google Scholar

page 391 note 4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. February, 1878.Google Scholar

page 392 note 1 This has been proved to be the case by Prof. Haughton, Nature, July 4, 1878.

page 392 note 2 Trans, of Geol. Soc. of Glasgow, Feb. 22, 1877.

page 393 note 1 Capt. Maury, of the U.S. Navy, was the first to call attention to the influence of the Gulf Stream on climate. Physical Geography of the Sea, 8th edition, 1860, p. 23.—Edit. Geol. Mag.