Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:03:38.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I. On the Correlation of the Miocene Beds of the West Indian Islands; and on the Synchronism of the Chert-formation of Antigua with the Lowest Limestone of Malta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Corals of the Miocene Formations as means of Correlation.—Although a general correlation has been established between the European Mid-tertiary formations and the Nivajé Shale and Limestone of San Domingo, the shale and part of the inclined limestones of Jamaica, the three coralliferous beds of Antigua, and the Newer Parian beds of Trinidad, still it has not hitherto been possible to determine a close parallelism between any particular European and West Indian Miocene stratum.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1864

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 97 note * , Heneken, Carrick, Moore, and Lonsdale, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. ix. p. 115.Google Scholar

page 97 note † Martin, Duncan, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xix. p. 406;Google Scholar Moore, and Jones, , op. cit. p. 510.Google Scholar

page 97 note ‡ Wall, and Sawkins, , Report Geol. Trinidad, 1860.Google Scholar

page 98 note * Nugent, , Trans. Geol. Soc., 1st series, vol. v. p. 459. 1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 101 note * Barrett, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xvi. p. 324.Google Scholar

page 101 note † See ProfJones', communication on the Orbitoides of, Antigua and Malta, p. 102.Google Scholar

page 101 note ‡ Miehelin, , Icon. Zooph., p. 62, pl. 13, fig. 2. 1842.Google Scholar

page 101 note § Milne-Edwards, and Haime, Jules, Ann. Science. Nat., 3rd series, vol. x. p. 295. 1849.Google Scholar

page 101 note ∥ Adams, Leith, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xix. p. 277.Google Scholar