Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:58:31.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Geology of Ascension and St. Helena Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Reginald A. Daly
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Extract

The writings of Charles Darwin, Renard, Mellis, Reinisch, and others have already made the salient features of lonely Ascension and St. Helena accessible, if not familiar, to geologists— St. Helena has won the surprised interest of biologists, who have long speculated on the origin of its unique species of plants and animals. From each island collections of rocks have been made. Following Renard's well-known contribution to the petrography of Ascension (“Challenger” Reports, Physics and Chemistry, vol. ii, 1889), Reinisch's paper in the Report of the Deutsche Siidpolar Expedition (1901–3) gives a large number of petrographical. descriptions, including a goodly number of chemical analyses. No adequate geological map of either island has, however, been published, nor, indeed, was this really possible before the British Admiralty had issued the greatly improved chart (No. 1691) of Ascension, in 1910, with corrections added to the year 1921, and the British War Office had issued its excellent contour-map of St. Helena, dated 1904. Each map is on a large scale. Even, though lacking contour lines, the Ascension chart was obviously to be of service to anyone attempting a reconnaisance survey of that island.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 156 note 1 Geol. Mag, Vol. LVII, 1920, p. 247.Google Scholar